scholarly journals New Insights into X-Chromosome Reactivation during Reprogramming to Pluripotency

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 2706
Author(s):  
Amitesh Panda ◽  
Jan J. Zylicz ◽  
Vincent Pasque

Dosage compensation between the sexes results in one X chromosome being inactivated during female mammalian development. Chromosome-wide transcriptional silencing from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in mammalian cells is erased in a process termed X-chromosome reactivation (XCR), which has emerged as a paradigm for studying the reversal of chromatin silencing. XCR is linked with germline development and induction of naive pluripotency in the epiblast, and also takes place upon reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotency. XCR depends on silencing of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) X inactive specific transcript (Xist) and is linked with the erasure of chromatin silencing. Over the past years, the advent of transcriptomics and epigenomics has provided new insights into the transcriptional and chromatin dynamics with which XCR takes place. However, multiple questions remain unanswered about how chromatin and transcription related processes enable XCR. Here, we review recent work on establishing the transcriptional and chromatin kinetics of XCR, as well as discuss a model by which transcription factors mediate XCR not only via Xist repression, but also by direct targeting of X-linked genes.

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Dixon-McDougall ◽  
Carolyn Brown

During X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), nearly an entire X chromosome is permanently silenced and converted into a Barr body, providing dosage compensation for eutherians between the sexes. XCI is facilitated by the upregulation of the long non-coding RNA gene, XIST, which coats its chromosome of origin, recruits heterochromatin factors, and silences gene expression. During XCI, at least two distinct types of heterochromatin are established, and in this review we discuss the enrichment of facultative heterochromatin marks such as H3K27me3, H2AK119ub, and macroH2A as well as pericentric heterochromatin marks such as HP1, H3K9me3, and H4K20me3. The extremely stable maintenance of silencing is a product of reinforcing interactions within and between these domains. This paper “Xplores” the current knowledge of the pathways involved in XCI, how the pathways interact, and the gaps in our understanding that need to be filled.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-yu Chen ◽  
Wenqiang Shi ◽  
Allison M. Matthews ◽  
Yifeng Li ◽  
David J. Arenillas ◽  
...  

AbstractSex differences in susceptibility and progression have been reported in numerous diseases. Female cells have two copies of the X chromosome with X-chromosome inactivation imparting mono-allelic gene silencing for dosage compensation. However, a subset of genes, named escapees, escape silencing and are transcribed bi-allelically resulting in sexual dimorphism. Here we conducted analyses of the sexes using human datasets to gain perspectives in such regulation. We identified transcription start sites of escapees (escTSSs) based on higher transcription levels in female cells using FANTOM5 CAGE data. Significant over-representations of YY1 transcription factor binding motif and ChIP-seq peaks around escTSSs highlighted its positive association with escapees. Furthermore, YY1 occupancy is significantly biased towards the inactive X (Xi) at long non-coding RNA loci that are frequent contacts of Xi-specific superloops. Our study elucidated the importance of YY1 on transcriptional activity on Xi in general through sequence-specific binding, and its involvement at superloop anchors.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elin Enervald ◽  
Rossana Foti ◽  
Lynn Marie Powell ◽  
Agnieszka Piszczek ◽  
Sara C.B. Buonomo

ABSTRACTDosage compensation for the X chromosome-linked genes in female placental mammals is achieved through the random silencing of one of the two X chromosomes. The onset of random X inactivation in mouse embryos and in differentiating embryonic stem cells requires the switch from a symmetric state, where both X chromosomes are equivalent, to an asymmetric state, where the identity of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. This “choice”, initiated by a stochastic event, needs to evolve into a stable and transmissible state. The transition from bi- to mono-allelic expression of the long non-coding RNA Tsix is thought to be one of the initial events breaking the symmetry of the two X chromosomes. Here we show that the asymmetric expression of Tsix triggers in turn the switch of RIF1 association with the Xist promoter from dynamic and symmetric to stable and asymmetric (on the future inactive X). On the future inactive X, RIF1 then plays an essential role in the upregulation of Xist, thus initiating the consolidation and stable transmission of the identity of the inactive X. Tsix-dependent exclusion of RIF1 from the future active X chromosome in turn permits the association of KAP1 with the Xist promoter, thus marking the future active X chromosome. Timely mono-allelic association of KAP1 is important for a stable choice and for X inactivation. We present here a double-bookmarking system, based on the mutually exclusive relationships of Tsix and RIF1, and RIF1 and KAP1. This system coordinates the identification of the active and inactive X chromosomes and initiates a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X chromosome state.


Author(s):  
Prakhar Bansal ◽  
Stefan F. Pinter

SUMMARYFemale human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are prone to undergoing X chromosome erosion (XCE), a progressive loss of key epigenetic features on the inactive X that initiates with repression of XIST, the long non-coding RNA required for X inactivation. As a result, previously silenced genes on the eroding X (Xe) reactivate, some of which are thought to provide selective advantages. To-date, the sporadic and progressive nature of XCE has largely obscured its scale, dynamics, and key transition events.To address this knowledge gap, we performed an integrated analysis of DNA methylation (DNAme), chromatin accessibility, and gene expression across hundreds of hPSC samples. Differential methylation across the Xe enables ordering female hPSCs across a trajectory of XCE from initiation to terminal stages. Our results identify a crucial cis-regulatory element for XIST expression, trace contiguously growing domains of reactivation to a few euchromatic origins on the Xi, and indicate that the late-stage Xe impairs DNAme genome-wide. Surprisingly, from this altered epigenetic landscape emerge select features of naïve pluripotency, suggesting its link to X chromosome dosage may be partially conserved in human embryonic development.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deo Prakash Chaturvedi

AbstractHyperactivity of the single X-chromosome in male Drosophila is achieved by establishing a ribonucleoprotein complex, called Dosage Compensation Complex (DCC), on the male X chromosome. Msl-1 and Msl-2 proteins, involved in the initiation and establishing of DCC on male X chromosome, are very crucial component of this complex. In the present study, it has been found here that a long non-coding RNA gene hsrω genetically interacts with Msl-1 as well as Msl-2 and suppresses the lethal phenotype of Msl-1 or Msl-2 down-regulation in its up-regulated background. Additionally, it is also found here that an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, NURF301, also interacts with hsrω in same manner. General lethality caused by Act-GAL4 driven global expression of NURF301-RNAi and the male-specific lethality following Msl-1-RNAi or Msl-2-RNAi transgene expression were partially suppressed by over-expression of hsrω, but not by down regulation through hsrω-RNAi. Likewise, eye phenotypes following ey-GAL4 driven down-regulation of NURF301 or Msl-1 or Msl-2 were also partially suppressed by over-expression of hsrω. Act-GAL4 driven global over-expression of hsrω along with Msl-1-RNAi or Msl-2-RNAi transgene substantially restored levels of MSL-2 protein on the male X chromosome. Similarly, levels and distribution of Megator protein, which was reduced and distribution at nuclear rim and in nucleoplasm was affected in the MT and SG nuclei, is also restored when hsrω transcripts are down-regulated in Act-GAL4 driven Msl-1-RNAi or Msl-2-RNAi genetic background. NURF301, a known chromatin remodeler, when down-regulated shows decondensed X chromosome in male larvae. Down-regulation of hsrω results in restoration of chromosome architecture without affecting the level of ISWI protein-another chromatin remodeler protein, known to interacting with hsrω.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Maclary ◽  
Emily Buttigieg ◽  
Michael Hinten ◽  
Srimonta Gayen ◽  
Clair Harris ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 123 (21) ◽  
pp. 3734-3744 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Zheng ◽  
Z. Shen ◽  
V. Tripathi ◽  
Z. Xuan ◽  
S. M. Freier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wenlun Wang ◽  
Lu Min ◽  
Xinyuan Qiu ◽  
Xiaomin Wu ◽  
Chuanyang Liu ◽  
...  

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate gene expression in a variety of ways at epigenetic, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional, and translational levels. Accumulating evidence suggests that lncRNA X-inactive specific transcript (lncRNA Xist) serves as an important regulator of cell growth and development. Despites its original roles in X-chromosome dosage compensation, lncRNA Xist also participates in the development of tumor and other human diseases by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA). In this review, we comprehensively summarized recent progress in understanding the cellular functions of lncRNA Xist in mammalian cells and discussed current knowledge regarding the ceRNA network of lncRNA Xist in various diseases. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts that are more than 200 nt in length and without an apparent protein-coding capacity (Furlan and Rougeulle, 2016; Maduro et al., 2016). These RNAs are believed to be transcribed by the approximately 98–99% non-coding regions of the human genome (Derrien et al., 2012; Fu, 2014; Montalbano et al., 2017; Slack and Chinnaiyan, 2019), as well as a large variety of genomic regions, such as exonic, tronic, and intergenic regions. Hence, lncRNAs are also divided into eight categories: Intergenic lncRNAs, Intronic lncRNAs, Enhancer lncRNAs, Promoter lncRNAs, Natural antisense/sense lncRNAs, Small nucleolar RNA-ended lncRNAs (sno-lncRNAs), Bidirectional lncRNAs, and non-poly(A) lncRNAs (Ma et al., 2013; Devaux et al., 2015; St Laurent et al., 2015; Chen, 2016; Quinn and Chang, 2016; Richard and Eichhorn, 2018; Connerty et al., 2020). A range of evidence has suggested that lncRNAs function as key regulators in crucial cellular functions, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion, by regulating the expression level of target genes via epigenomic, transcriptional, or post-transcriptional approaches (Cao et al., 2018). Moreover, lncRNAs detected in body fluids were also believed to serve as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease progression, and act as novel and potential drug targets for therapeutic exploitation in human disease (Jiang W. et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019a). Long non-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript (lncRNA Xist) are a set of 15,000–20,000 nt sequences localized in the X chromosome inactivation center (XIC) of chromosome Xq13.2 (Brown et al., 1992; Debrand et al., 1998; Kay, 1998; Lee et al., 2013; da Rocha and Heard, 2017; Yang Z. et al., 2018; Brockdorff, 2019). Previous studies have indicated that lncRNA Xist regulate X chromosome inactivation (XCI), resulting in the inheritable silencing of one of the X-chromosomes during female cell development. Also, it serves a vital regulatory function in the whole spectrum of human disease (notably cancer) and can be used as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and as a potential therapeutic target for human disease in the clinic (Liu et al., 2018b; Deng et al., 2019; Dinescu et al., 2019; Mutzel and Schulz, 2020; Patrat et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020a). In particular, lncRNA Xist have been demonstrated to be involved in the development of multiple types of tumors including brain tumor, Leukemia, lung cancer, breast cancer, and liver cancer, with the prominent examples outlined in Table 1. It was also believed that lncRNA Xist (Chaligne and Heard, 2014; Yang Z. et al., 2018) contributed to other diseases, such as pulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, neuropathic pain, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and osteoarthritis chondrocytes, and more specific details can be found in Table 2. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms of lncRNA Xist on both chromosome dosage compensation and pathogenesis (especially cancer) processes, with a focus on the regulatory network of lncRNA Xist in human disease.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rini Shah ◽  
Ashwin Kelkar ◽  
Sanjeev Galande

ABSTRACTThe long non-coding RNA XIST is the master regulator for the process of X chromosome inactivation in mammalian females. Here we report the existence of a hitherto uncharacterized cis regulatory element within the first exon of human XIST, which by associating with the promoter region through chromatin looping defines the transcriptional status of XIST. This interaction is brought about by CTCF, which in turn assists towards the maintenance of YY1 binding at the promoter and governs XIST transcription. Strikingly, the cis element is competitively bound by pluripotency factors and CTCF, wherein the enrichment of the former disrupts its interaction with the promoter, leading to downregulation of XIST. Collectively, our study uncovers the combinatorial effect of multiple epigenetic and transcription factors influencing XIST expression during the initiation and maintenance phases of inactivation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1609) ◽  
pp. 20110325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sado ◽  
Neil Brockdorff

In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes becomes genetically silenced to compensate for dosage imbalance of X-linked genes between XX females and XY males. X chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) is a classical model for epigenetic gene regulation in mammals and has been studied for half a century. In the last two decades, efforts have been focused on the X inactive-specific transcript ( Xist ) locus, discovered to be the master regulator of X-inactivation. The Xist gene produces a non-coding RNA that functions as the primary switch for X-inactivation, coating the X chromosome from which it is transcribed in cis . Significant progress has been made towards understanding how Xist is regulated at the onset of X-inactivation, but our understanding of the molecular basis of silencing mediated by Xist RNA has progressed more slowly. A picture has, however, begun to emerge, and new tools and resources hold out the promise of further advances to come. Here, we provide an overview of the current state of our knowledge, what is known about Xist RNA and how it may trigger chromosome silencing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document