scholarly journals Immunotherapy, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Robert Lichtenstern ◽  
Rachael Katie Ngu ◽  
Shabnam Shalapour ◽  
Michael Karin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Adoptive T Cell Therapy ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
T Cell Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type, and third highest in mortality rates among cancer-related deaths in the United States. Originating from intestinal epithelial cells in the colon and rectum, that are impacted by numerous factors including genetics, environment and chronic, lingering inflammation, CRC can be a problematic malignancy to treat when detected at advanced stages. Chemotherapeutic agents serve as the historical first line of defense in the treatment of metastatic CRC. In recent years, however, combinational treatment with targeted therapies, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, has proven to be quite effective in patients with specific CRC subtypes. While scientific and clinical advances have uncovered promising new treatment options, the five-year survival rate for metastatic CRC is still low at about 14%. Current research into the efficacy of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient and microsatellite instability high (dMMR–MSI-H) CRC tumors have shown promising results, but its use in other CRC subtypes has been either unsuccessful, or not extensively explored. This Review will focus on the current status of immunotherapies, including ICI, vaccination and adoptive T cell therapy (ATC) in the treatment of CRC and its potential use, not only in dMMR–MSI-H CRC, but also in mismatch repair proficient and microsatellite instability low (pMMR-MSI-L).

scholarly journals Beyond Microsatellite Instability: Evolving Strategies Integrating Immunotherapy for Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Pecci ◽  
Luca Cantini ◽  
Alessandro Bittoni ◽  
Edoardo Lenci ◽  
Alessio Lupi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tnm Classification ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
The Impact

Opinion statementAdvanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by several subtypes with distinctive genetic and epigenetic patterns. During the last years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revamped the standard of care of several tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, highlighting the role of immune cells in tumor microenvironment (TME) and their impact on cancer progression and treatment efficacy. An “immunoscore,” based on the percentage of two lymphocyte populations both at tumor core and invasive margin, has been shown to improve prediction of treatment outcome when added to UICC-TNM classification. To date, pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor, has gained approval as first-line therapy for mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) advanced CRC. On the other hand, no reports of efficacy have been presented in mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. This group includes roughly 95% of all advanced CRC, and standard chemotherapy, in addition to anti-EGFR or anti-angiogenesis drugs, still represents first treatment choice. Hopefully, deeper understanding of CRC immune landscape and of the impact of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations on tumor immunogenicity might lead to the development of new drug combination strategies to overcome ICIs resistance in pMMR CRC, thus paving the way for immunotherapy even in this subgroup.

scholarly journals Discordance between immunochemistry of mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 100120
Author(s):  
A. Guyot D'Asnières De Salins ◽  
G. Tachon ◽  
R. Cohen ◽  
L. Karayan-Tapon ◽  
A. Junca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Mismatch Repair Proteins

scholarly journals MicroRNAs miR-1 and miR-206 Regulate Monocarboxylate Transporter-4 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Anas Khaleel ◽  
Rowan AlEjielat ◽  
Cristina I. Batarseh ◽  
Abdallah Ahmed Elbakkoush ◽  
Amneh Tarkhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Monocarboxylate Transporter ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Web Tool ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Monocarboxylate Transporter 4

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently the third most common cancer type in males and the second most occurring in females. The role of microRNA (miRNA) in the development of colorectal cancer is not fully elucidated. Therefore, understanding the mechanistic interaction between miRNA and their target oncogenes may hold great importance as a possible target for interventional anticancer therapy. Aims: To identify miRNAs that are part of the regulating pathway of Monocarboxylate Transporter-4 (MCT4) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) oncogenes. Study Design: We used publicly available prediction tools (e.g. TargetScan, MicroCosm, PicTar, and DIANA-microT-CDS) to identify the possible miRNA that target the two oncogenes. Methodology: We used the GeneMania database to visualize the network and verify gene names and remove ambiguity and duplications.  Furthermore, we used miRTarBase database to identify experimentally validated targets which we used to further confirm miRNA-oncogene relationships.  Finally, we utilized miR-Mfold web-tool to further visualize the circular structures and the simulated miR-1 and miR-206 targeting arrangements. Results: We found two putative miRNA (miR-1 and miR-206) that may downregulate MCT4 coded by SLC16A3 gene and VEGF which is coded by VEGF gene. We found relationships between the validated target genes of miR-1 and miR-206 through GeneMania which we extracted from the literature. And we elucidated the proposed structure of these two miRNAs through miR-Mfold web-tool. Conclusion: Our results elucidated a novel regulation pathway in CRC cells and may suggest a potential therapeutic approach for CRC therapy. MiR-1 and miR-206 may help cells go to apoptosis and inhibit the angiogenesis of colorectal cancer cells by down-regulation of MCT4 and VEGF proteins in tumor tissues.

Microsatellite instability status differentially associates with intratumoral immune microenvironment in human cancers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Mingyue Liu ◽  
Ya Cui ◽  
Pan Zheng ◽  
Yang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
In Silico Analysis ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Stomach Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Immune Contexture ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Based on clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer, high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a genetic test to select patients for immunotherapy targeting PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 without limitation to cancer type. However, it is unclear whether the MSI-H would broadly alter the tumor microenvironment to confer the therapeutic response of different cancer types to immunotherapy. To fill in this gap, we performed an in silico analysis of tumor immunity among different MSI statuses in five cancer types. We found that consistent with clinical responses to immunotherapy, MSI-H and non-MSI-H samples from colorectal cancer (COAD-READ) exhibited distinct infiltration levels and immune phenotypes. Surprisingly, the immunological difference between MSI-H and non-MSI-H samples was diminished in stomach adenocarcinoma and esophageal carcinoma (STAD-ESCA) and completely disappeared in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC). Regardless of cancer types, the abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, rather than MSI status, strongly associated with the clinical outcome. Since preexisting antitumor immune response in the tumor (hot cancer) is accepted as a prerequisite to the therapeutic response to anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy, our data demonstrate that the impact of MSI varied on immune contexture will lead to the further evaluation of predictive immunotherapy responsiveness based on the universal biomarker of MSI status.

Addition of Aflibercept to Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Improves Survival in a Phase III Randomized Trial in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3499-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Radek Lakomy ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Jana Prausová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) commonly involves a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen such as infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, often combined with bevacizumab or an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. We studied the effect of adding the novel antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (also known as ziv-aflibercept in the United States) to FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin, including patients who received prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept (4 mg/kg intravenously; 612 patients) or placebo (614 patients) every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival relative to placebo plus FOLFIRI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.817; 95.34% CI, 0.713 to 0.937; P = .0032) with median survival times of 13.50 versus 12.06 months, respectively. Aflibercept also significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.661 to 0.869; P < .0001), with median PFS times of 6.90 versus 4.67 months, respectively. The effects on overall survival and PFS exhibited a consistent trend across prespecified subgroup analyses, including bevacizumab pretreated patients. Response rate was 19.8% (95% CI, 16.4% to 23.2%) with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI compared with 11.1% (95% CI, 8.5% to 13.8%) with placebo plus FOLFIRI (P = .0001). Adverse effects reported with aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI included the characteristic anti–vascular endothelial growth factor effects and also reflected an increased incidence of some chemotherapy-related toxicities. Conclusion Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI conferred a statistically significant survival benefit over FOLFIRI combined with placebo in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document