scholarly journals Transcriptional Regulation of Autophagy Genes via Stage-Specific Activation of CEBPB and PPARG during Adipogenesis: A Systematic Study Using Public Gene Expression and Transcription Factor Binding Datasets

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Ahmed ◽  
Trang Huyen Lai ◽  
Jin Seok Hwang ◽  
Sahib Zada ◽  
Trang Minh Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Autophagy Gene ◽  
Occupancy Patterns ◽  
Differentiation Stage

Autophagy is the cell self-eating mechanism to maintain cell homeostasis by removing damaged intracellular proteins or organelles. It has also been implicated in the development and differentiation of various cell types including the adipocyte. Several links between adipogenic transcription factors and key autophagy genes has been suggested. In this study, we tried to model the gene expression and their transcriptional regulation during the adipocyte differentiation using high-throughput sequencing datasets of the 3T3-L1 cell model. We applied the gene expression and co-expression analysis to all and the subset of autophagy genes to study the binding, and occupancy patterns of adipogenic factors, co-factors and histone modifications on key autophagy genes. We also analyzed the gene expression of key autophagy genes under different transcription factor knockdown adipocyte cells. We found that a significant percent of the variance in the autophagy gene expression is explained by the differentiation stage of the cell. Adipogenic master regulators, such as CEBPB and PPARG target key autophagy genes directly. In addition, the same factor may also control autophagy gene expression indirectly through autophagy transcription factors such as FOXO1, TFEB or XBP1. Finally, the binding of adipogenic factors is associated with certain patterns of co-factors binding that might modulate the functions. Some of the findings were further confirmed under the knockdown of the adipogenic factors in the differentiating adipocytes. In conclusion, autophagy genes are regulated as part of the transcriptional programs through adipogenic factors either directly or indirectly through autophagy transcription factors during adipogenesis.

scholarly journals New class of transcription factors controls flagellar assembly by recruiting RNA polymerase II in Chlamydomonas

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (17) ◽  
pp. 4435-4440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Li ◽  
Guangmei Tian ◽  
Hai Peng ◽  
Dan Meng ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Flagellar Gene ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Biochemical Function ◽  
Flagellar Assembly ◽  
Flagellar Genes

Cells have developed regulatory mechanisms that underlie flagellar assembly and maintenance, including the transcriptional regulation of flagellar genes, an initial step for making flagella. Although transcriptional regulation of flagellar gene expression is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas, no transcription factor that regulates the transcription of flagellar genes has been identified. We report that X chromosome-associated protein 5 (XAP5) acts as a transcription factor to regulate flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. While XAP5 proteins are evolutionarily conserved across diverse organisms and play vital roles in diverse biological processes, nothing is known about the biochemical function of any member of this important protein family. Our data show that loss of XAP5 leads to defects in flagellar assembly. Posttranslational modifications of XAP5 track flagellar length during flagellar assembly, suggesting that cells possess a feedback system that modulates modifications to XAP5. Notably, XAP5 regulates flagellar gene expression via directly binding to a motif containing a CTGGGGTG-core. Furthermore, recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) machinery for transcriptional activation depends on the activities of XAP5. Our data demonstrate that, through recruitment of Pol II, XAP5 defines a class of transcription factors for transcriptional regulation of ciliary genes. This work provides insights into the biochemical function of the XAP5 family and the fundamental biology of the flagellar assembly, which enhance our understanding of the signaling and functions of flagella.

scholarly journals Tissue-specific actions of Pax6 on proliferation-differentiation balance in the developing forebrain are Foxg1-dependent

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idoia Quintana-Urzainqui ◽  
Zrinko Kozić ◽  
Soham Mitra ◽  
Tian Tian ◽  
Martine Manuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Multiple Regions ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene Expression

SummaryDifferences in the growth and maturation of diverse forebrain tissues depends on region-specific transcriptional regulation. Individual transcription factors act simultaneously in multiple regions that develop very differently, raising questions about the extent to which their actions vary regionally. We found that the transcription factor Pax6 affects the transcriptomes and the balance between proliferation and differentiation in opposite directions in murine diencephalon versus cortex. We tested several possible mechanisms to explain Pax6’s tissue-specific actions and found that the presence of the transcription factor Foxg1 in cortex but not diencephalon was most influential. We found that Foxg1 is responsible for many of the differences in cell cycle gene expression between diencephalon and cortex. In cortex lacking Foxg1, Pax6’s action on the balance of proliferation versus differentiation became diencephalon-like. Our findings reveal a mechanism for generating regional forebrain diversity in which the actions of one transcription factor completely reverse the actions of another.

scholarly journals Positional specificity of different transcription factor classes within enhancers

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (30) ◽  
pp. E7222-E7230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R. Grossman ◽  
Jesse Engreitz ◽  
John P. Ray ◽  
Tung H. Nguyen ◽  
Nir Hacohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Functional Characteristics ◽  
Positional Specificity ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Positional Bias

Gene expression is controlled by sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs), which bind to regulatory sequences in DNA. TF binding occurs in nucleosome-depleted regions of DNA (NDRs), which generally encompass regions with lengths similar to those protected by nucleosomes. However, less is known about where within these regions specific TFs tend to be found. Here, we characterize the positional bias of inferred binding sites for 103 TFs within ∼500,000 NDRs across 47 cell types. We find that distinct classes of TFs display different binding preferences: Some tend to have binding sites toward the edges, some toward the center, and some at other positions within the NDR. These patterns are highly consistent across cell types, suggesting that they may reflect TF-specific intrinsic structural or functional characteristics. In particular, TF classes with binding sites at NDR edges are enriched for those known to interact with histones and chromatin remodelers, whereas TFs with central enrichment interact with other TFs and cofactors such as p300. Our results suggest distinct regiospecific binding patterns and functions of TF classes within enhancers.

Estrogen receptor action through target genes with classical and alternative response elements

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1757-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Kushner ◽  
P. Webb ◽  
R. M. Uht ◽  
M.-M. Liu ◽  
R. H. Price
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Environmental Estrogens ◽  
Alternative Response ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Response Elements

The estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ERα and ERβ) mediate the changes in gene expression from physiological and environmental estrogens. Early studies identified classical estrogen response elements (EREs) in the promoter region of target genes whose expression is regulated by estrogen and to which the ERs bind via their DNA-binding domain (DBD). EREs in the pituitary prolactin promoter, for example, mediate an activation by both ERα and ERβ albeit with different affinities for different ligands. Full activation in most cell types requires the integrity of the activation function 2 (AF-2) in the receptors ligand binding domain (LBD), which is engaged by estrogens and disengaged by tamoxifen, raloxifene, and other antiestrogens. However, in some cells and ERE contexts, the AF-1 in the ERα amino terminal domain (NTD) is sufficient. We now know that ERs also regulate expression of target genes that do not have EREs, but instead have various kinds of alternative response elements that bind heterologous transcription factors whose activity is regulated by interactions with ERs. Thus, ERα activates genes, including collagenase and cyclin D1, an important mediator of cellular proliferation, by AP-1 and CRE sites, which bind Jun/Fos or Jun/ATF-2 transcription factors. ERα also activates gene expression through GC-rich elements that bind the SP1 transcription factor. Finally, we also know that ERs mediate inhibition of the expression of many genes. In one well-studied instance, ERs counterexpression of genes involved in the inflammatory response by inhibiting the action at tumor necrosis factor response elements (TNF-REs) that bind the NFkappaB transcription factor. ERβ is especially efficient at this inhibition. ERα activation of AP-1/CRE target genes is of special interest because of the putative role of these target genes in mediating proliferation. The AF-1 and AF-2 functions of ERα are both needed for this activation in most cell types. However, in uterine cells, the AF-1 function is sufficient. Thus, the antiestrogen tamoxifen, which allows AF-1, mimics estrogen and drives activation of AP-1/CRE target genes and proliferation of uterine cells. This estrogen-like action, which can increase the risk of uterine cancer, complicates the use of tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer. Surprisingly, ERβ inhibits AP-1/CRE target genes in the presence of estrogen. When both receptors are present, ERβ efficiently opposes activation by ERα. Moreover, ERβ activates the AP-1/CRE target genes in the presence of antiestrogens especially so-called "complete" antiestrogens raloxifene, and ICI 182, 780. We here review the evidence for different kinds of promoter elements that mediate ER action, for the differential ligand preferences of ERα and ERβ at these different elements, and the potential mechanisms by which they are mediated. One attractive strategy for the investigation and comparison of potential environmental estrogens is to assay their activity in cell culture systems using reporter genes with simplified promoter elements. Thus, the findings of complexity in ERα and ERβ activation at different types of response elements needs to be taken into account in the development and interpretation of assays using simplified promoter elements systems.

scholarly journals PKA-activated ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer is a key downstream effector of ApCREB and is necessary and sufficient for the consolidation of long-term facilitation

2006 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 827-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-A Lee ◽  
Sue-Hyun Lee ◽  
Changhoon Lee ◽  
Deok-Jin Chang ◽  
Yong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Downstream Effector ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Long Term Facilitation

Long-term memory requires transcriptional regulation by a combination of positive and negative transcription factors. Aplysia activating factor (ApAF) is known to be a positive transcription factor that forms heterodimers with ApC/EBP and ApCREB2. How these heterodimers are regulated and how they participate in the consolidation of long-term facilitation (LTF) has not, however, been characterized. We found that the functional activation of ApAF required phosphorylation of ApAF by PKA on Ser-266. In addition, ApAF lowered the threshold of LTF by forming a heterodimer with ApCREB2. Moreover, once activated by PKA, the ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer transactivates enhancer response element–containing genes and can induce LTF in the absence of CRE- and CREB-mediated gene expression. Collectively, these results suggest that PKA-activated ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer is a core downstream effector of ApCREB in the consolidation of LTF.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals The AML-associated K313 mutation enhances C/EBPα activity by leading to C/EBPα overexpression

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Edward Gentle ◽  
Isabel Moelter ◽  
Mohamed Tarek Badr ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Michael Lübbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Culture ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Elevated Expression ◽  
Factor C ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractMutations in the transcription factor C/EBPα are found in ~10% of all acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases but the contribution of these mutations to leukemogenesis is incompletely understood. We here use a mouse model of granulocyte progenitors expressing conditionally active HoxB8 to assess the cell biological and molecular activity of C/EBPα-mutations associated with human AML. Both N-terminal truncation and C-terminal AML-associated mutations of C/EBPα substantially altered differentiation of progenitors into mature neutrophils in cell culture. Closer analysis of the C/EBPα-K313-duplication showed expansion and prolonged survival of mutant C/EBPα-expressing granulocytes following adoptive transfer into mice. C/EBPα-protein containing the K313-mutation further showed strongly enhanced transcriptional activity compared with the wild-type protein at certain promoters. Analysis of differentially regulated genes in cells overexpressing C/EBPα-K313 indicates a strong correlation with genes regulated by C/EBPα. Analysis of transcription factor enrichment in the differentially regulated genes indicated a strong reliance of SPI1/PU.1, suggesting that despite reduced DNA binding, C/EBPα-K313 is active in regulating target gene expression and acts largely through a network of other transcription factors. Strikingly, the K313 mutation caused strongly elevated expression of C/EBPα-protein, which could also be seen in primary K313 mutated AML blasts, explaining the enhanced C/EBPα activity in K313-expressing cells.

scholarly journals Candida albicans Ferric Reductases Are Differentially Regulated in Response to Distinct Forms of Iron Limitation by the Rim101 and CBF Transcription Factors

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1168-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Un Baek ◽  
Mingchun Li ◽  
Dana A. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Iron Acquisition ◽  
Mammalian Host ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Ferric Reductase ◽  
Reductase Gene ◽  
Ferric Reductases

ABSTRACT Iron is an essential nutrient that is severely limited in the mammalian host. Candida albicans encodes a family of 15 putative ferric reductases, which are required for iron acquisition and utilization. Despite the central role of ferric reductases in iron acquisition and mobilization, relatively little is known about the regulatory networks that govern ferric reductase gene expression in C. albicans. Here we have demonstrated the differential regulation of two ferric reductases, FRE2 and FRP1, in response to distinct iron-limited environments. FRE2 and FRP1 are both induced in alkaline-pH environments directly by the Rim101 transcription factor. However, FRP1 but not FRE2 is also induced by iron chelation. We have identified a CCAAT motif as the critical regulatory sequence for chelator-mediated induction and have found that the CCAAT binding factor (CBF) is essential for FRP1 expression in iron-limited environments. We found that a hap5Δ/hap5Δ mutant, which disrupts the core DNA binding activity of CBF, is unable to grow under iron-limited conditions. C. albicans encodes three CBF-dependent transcription factors, and we identified the Hap43 protein as the CBF-dependent transcription factor required for iron-limited responses. These studies provide key insights into the regulation of ferric reductase gene expression in the fungal pathogen C. albicans.

scholarly journals Modeling transcriptional regulation using gene regulatory networks based on multi-omics data sources

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neel Patel ◽  
William S. Bush
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Chromatin Looping ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Transcriptional regulation is complex, requiring multiple cis (local) and trans acting mechanisms working in concert to drive gene expression, with disruption of these processes linked to multiple diseases. Previous computational attempts to understand the influence of regulatory mechanisms on gene expression have used prediction models containing input features derived from cis regulatory factors. However, local chromatin looping and trans-acting mechanisms are known to also influence transcriptional regulation, and their inclusion may improve model accuracy and interpretation. In this study, we create a general model of transcription factor influence on gene expression by incorporating both cis and trans gene regulatory features. Results We describe a computational framework to model gene expression for GM12878 and K562 cell lines. This framework weights the impact of transcription factor-based regulatory data using multi-omics gene regulatory networks to account for both cis and trans acting mechanisms, and measures of the local chromatin context. These prediction models perform significantly better compared to models containing cis-regulatory features alone. Models that additionally integrate long distance chromatin interactions (or chromatin looping) between distal transcription factor binding regions and gene promoters also show improved accuracy. As a demonstration of their utility, effect estimates from these models were used to weight cis-regulatory rare variants for sequence kernel association test analyses of gene expression. Conclusions Our models generate refined effect estimates for the influence of individual transcription factors on gene expression, allowing characterization of their roles across the genome. This work also provides a framework for integrating multiple data types into a single model of transcriptional regulation.

scholarly journals Minireview: Transcriptional Regulation in Development of Bone

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 1012-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Henry Kronenberg
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Bone Development ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Bone Cell ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Multiple Differentiation

Regulation of gene expression by transcription factors is one of the major mechanisms for controlling cellular functions. Recent advances in genetic manipulation of model animals has allowed the study of the roles of various genes and their products in physiological settings and has demonstrated the importance of specific transcription factors in bone development. Three lineages of bone cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts, develop and differentiate according to their distinct developmental programs. These cells go through multiple differentiation stages, which are often regulated by specific transcription factors. In this minireview, we will discuss selected transcription factors that have been demonstrated to critically affect bone cell development. Further study of these molecules will lead to deeper understanding in mechanisms that govern development of bone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document