scholarly journals Updates on the CDK4/6 Inhibitory Strategy and Combinations in Breast Cancer

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sobhani ◽  
D’Angelo ◽  
Pittacolo ◽  
Roviello ◽  
Miccoli ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer (BC) is the second most common type of cancer worldwide and displays the highest cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Targeted therapies have revolutionized the way BC has been treated in recent decades, improving the life expectancies of millions of women. Among the different molecular pathways that have been of interest for the development of targeted therapies are the Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDK). CDK inhibitors are a class of molecules that already exist in nature and those belonging to the Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors family INK4 that specifically inhibit CDK4/6 proteins. CDK4/6 inhibitors specifically block the transition from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle by dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein. In the past four years, the CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, received their first FDA approval for the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer after showing significant improvements in progression-free survival in the PALOMA-1, MONALEESA-2 and the MONARCH-2 randomized clinical trials, respectively. After the encouraging results from these clinical trials, CDK4/6 inhibitors have also been investigated in other BC subtypes. In HER2-positive BC, a combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with HER2-targeted therapies showed promise in preclinical studies and their clinical evaluation is ongoing. Moreover, in triple-negative BC, the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors has been investigated in combination with other targeted therapies or immunotherapies. This review summarizes the molecular background and clinical efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents or in combination with other targeted therapies for the treatment of BC. Future directions for ongoing clinical trials and predictive biomarkers will be further debated.

Author(s):  
Navid Sobhani ◽  
Alberto D'Angelo ◽  
Matteo Pittacolo ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Tobias Otto

Breast Cancer (BC) is the second most common type of cancer worldwide and displays the highest cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Targeted therapies have revolutionized the way BC has been treated in the last decades improving life expectancies of millions of women. Among the different molecular pathways that have been of interest for the development of targeted therapies are the Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDK). CDK inhibitors are a class of molecules that already exist in nature and those belonging to the INK4 protein family specifically inhibit the CDK4/6 proteins. CDK4/6 inhibitors specifically block the transition from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle by dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein. In the past four years CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib received their first FDA approval for the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer after showing significant improvements in progression-free survival in the PALOMA-1, MONALEESA-2 and the MONARCH-2 randomized clinical trials, respectively. After the encouraging results from these clinical trials, CDK4/6 inhibitors have also been investigated in the other BC subtypes. In HER2-positive BC, combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with HER2-targeted therapies showed promise in preclinical studies and their clinical evaluation is ongoing. Moreover, in triple-negative BC, CDK4/6 inhibitors efficacy has been investigated in combination with other targeted therapies or immunotherapies. This review summarizes the molecular background and clinical efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents or in combination with other targeted therapies for the treatment of BC. Future directions of ongoing clinical trials and predictive biomarkers will be further debated.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav Engebraten ◽  
Christina Yau ◽  
Kristian Berg ◽  
Elin Borgen ◽  
Oystein Garred ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Targeted therapeutics strongly depends on validated biomarkers in order to select patients most likely to benefit from the treatment. HER2 serves as a predictive biomarker for HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. HER2 may, however, also be utilized as a transport gate for delivery of cytotoxic agents into the cell, such as for HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates (ADCs; e.g. trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)). The predictive biomarkers for such ADCs may be more complex, also reflecting the intracellular transport. METHODS: Five HER2-positive breast and ovarian cancer cell lines were evaluated with respect to T-DM1 sensitivity and correlated to the expression levels of proteins involved in endocytic trafficking including RAB4A, RAB5A and RAB11A, with possible impact on ADC pharmacology. The results were confirmed in a clinical cohort consisting of patients from the adaptive breast cancer clinical trial I-SPY2 where pathological complete response (pCR) was correlated to the RNA expression level of RAB4A, RAB5A and RAB11A. A subset of the clinical KAMILLA trial including 19 patients was used as a verification cohort where semi-quantitative IHC of RAB5A was correlated to progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The early endosome marker RAB5A, was found to correlate positively to T-DM1 sensitivity in the cell line panel. Correlation between RAB5A expression and T-DM1 sensitivity (pCR) was confirmed in patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine/pertuzumab in the I-SPY2 trial, but not in the trastuzumab/paclitaxel control arm. The clinical correlation was verified in the patients from the KAMILLA trial where semi- quantitative RAB5A IHC staining correlated significantly positive to PFS. CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that RAB5A is a predictive biomarker for T-DM1 and outline, for the first time, proteins involved in endocytic trafficking as predictive biomarkers for ADCs.


2019 ◽  
pp. 42-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. B. Kononenko ◽  
A. V. Snegovoi ◽  
V. Yu. Selchuk

Breast Cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide. Scientific advances and new ways of treating have significantly improved the prognosis of breast cancer in recent decades. The emergence of modern cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors has changed the treatment paradigm for metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. In the past four years, the CDK4/6 inhibitors, ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib, received their first FDA approval for the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR)- positive and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer after showing significant improvements in progression-free survival in the PALOMA, MONALEESA and the MONARCH randomized clinical trials, respectively. In the Russian standards for the treatment of metastatic HR positive and HER2-negative breast cancer are included two inhibitors of CDK4/6 – ribociclib, palbociclib. This review summarizes the background of clinical efficacy and potential toxicities seen with the use CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine treatment in pre- or postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Despite the similar toxicities, inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases differ in their severity and some types of adverse events. Most hematologic abnormalities seen with CDK4/6 inhibitors are not complicated and are adequately managed with standard supportive care and dose adjustments when indicated. This review focuses on the practical management of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilana Schlam ◽  
Sandra M. Swain

AbstractHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer accounts for 20–25% of all breast cancers. Multiple HER2-targeted therapies have been developed over the last few years, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, and pyrotinib. These drugs target HER2 and other receptors of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, therefore each has unique efficacy and adverse event profile. HER2-directed TKIs have been studied in the early stage and advanced settings and have shown promising responses. There is increasing interest in utilizing these drugs in combination with chemotherapy and /or other HER2-directed agents in patients with central nervous system involvement, TKIs have shown to be effective in this setting for which treatment options have been previously limited and the prognosis remains poor. The aim of this review is to summarize currently approved TKIs for HER2+ breast, key clinical trials, and their use in current clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591881834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Matutino ◽  
Carla Amaro ◽  
Sunil Verma

The development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors has been more prominent in hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers, with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in first and later lines of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that there is activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in nonluminal cell lines. Here, we present a review of the current preclinical and clinical data on the use of CDK inhibitors in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1334-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Majewski ◽  
Paolo Nuciforo ◽  
Lorenza Mittempergher ◽  
Astrid J. Bosma ◽  
Holger Eidtmann ◽  
...  

Purpose We investigated whether mutations in the gene encoding the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) correlates with response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –targeted therapies in patients with breast cancer. Patients and Methods Baseline tissue biopsies were available from patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who were enrolled onto the Neoadjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial (NeoALTTO). Activating mutations in PIK3CA were identified using mass spectrometry–based genotyping. Results PIK3CA mutations were identified in 23% of HER2-positive breast tumors, and these mutations were associated with poorer outcome in all of the treatment arms. Patients treated with a combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib who had wild-type PIK3CA obtained a total pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 53.1%, which decreased to 28.6% in patients with tumors that carried PIK3CA activating mutations (P = .012). Conclusion Activating mutations in PIK3CA predicted poor pCR in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapies that target HER2. Consequently, the combination of anti-HER2 agents and PI3K inhibitors is being investigated.


ABOUTOPEN ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ardito ◽  
Fiorella Restaino Marino

Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) oncoprotein in breast cancer patients, is one of the biological characteristics of the disease that determines the choice of appropriate systemic treatment. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman, with relapsing HER2-positive breast cancer in cerebral and pulmonary cells. The patient underwent multimodal first Iine treatment including pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel and panencephalic radiotherapy with good response and progression-free survival for approximately 16 months. Subsequently, further to a encephalic progression of the disease, the patient was treated in second line with the combination lapatinib + capecitabine which induced further encephalic response and disease control for additional 20 months (Oncology).


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii12-iii12
Author(s):  
Anders Erickson ◽  
Steven Habbous ◽  
Frances Wright ◽  
Aisha Lofters ◽  
Katarzyna Jerzak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Targeted therapies have been hypothesized to prolong survival in the management of patients with intracranial metastatic disease (IMD), but, paradoxically, to increase IMD incidence by improving systemic disease control and prolonging survival from the primary tumor. The real-world benefits of targeted therapy in management of patients with IMD are unclear, as clinical trials have excluded patients with IMD and lacked endpoints reporting intracranial outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all patients in Ontario, Canada, diagnosed with IMD from 2005 to 2018 with primary diagnoses of breast cancer, lung or bronchus cancer, or melanoma, and control patients matched by primary disease without IMD. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) between patient sub-cohorts divided by primary disease and stratified by targeted therapy receipt or IMD status. Results Post-IMD targeted therapy was associated with prolonged OS in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33–0.5), EGFR-positive lung cancer (HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.23–0.34), and BRAF-positive melanoma (HR 0.2; 95% CI, 0.14–0.29), compared to those who did not receive post-IMD targeted therapy. Presence of IMD was associated with shorter OS in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (HR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.56–2.08) and metastatic EGFR-positive lung cancer (HR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08–1.39) but not metastatic BRAF-positive melanoma (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.77–1.61), compared to those without IMD. Conclusions Our findings show that real-world use of targeted therapies was associated with prolonged OS in patients with IMD in the setting of HER2-positive breast cancer, EGFR-positive lung cancer, and BRAF-positive melanoma. Inclusion of patients with IMD in clinical trials and use of endpoints that interrogate IMD will be critical to determine the role of targeted therapies in the management of patients with IMD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040
Author(s):  
Hans-Christian Kolberg ◽  
Özlem Yüksel ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Sara Brucker ◽  
Hans Tesch ◽  
...  

1040 Background: Metaanalyses have demonstrated that 5% of initially HER2 negative breast cancer patients switch to HER2 positive during the course of the disease. Whether there is a difference in benefit from standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients initially HER2 positive and patients switching from negative to positive is unclear. We used data from the PRAEGNANT registry to compare the outcome of those patients. Methods: PRAEGNANT is a prospective advanced breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis compared progression-free survival (PFS) with standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients with tumors initially HER2 negative and switched to HER2 positive and patients with tumors that were initially HER2 positive adjusted for age and hormone receptor status. Results: At the time of this analysis 4061 patients with MBC were included in the PRAEGNANT registry, 49 of which met the requirements for this analysis. Median age was 56 (IQR 48-64) years and 87.8% of the patients were hormone receptor positive. At first diagnosis 15 patients were HER2 negative and 34 patients were HER2 positive. Within a median observation time of 9 months (95%CI: 3.8, 23.7) 35 PFS events occurred. Median observation time was 9 months (95% CI: 3.8, 23.7). Initially HER2 positive patients had a longer progression-free survival (HR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.24, 1.03), p = 0.07) as compared to initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive. The 1- and 2-year-PFS rates were also higher for patients initially HER2 positive: 1-year-PFS: 52% (95% CI: 36%, 73%) versus 26 % (95% CI: 12%, 52%); 2-year-PFS: 44% (95% CI: 29%, 67%) versus 19% (95% CI: 7%, 50%). Conclusions: Median PFS and 1- and 2-year PFS rate seem to be better in patients HER2 positive at initial diagnosis receiving standard HER2 directed therapies. Although our result has to be interpreted with caution because of the small cohort and the retrospective nature of our analysis, it justifies prospective research including the group of initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive as a distinct entity. Clinical trial information: NCT02338167 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document