scholarly journals Regulation of RNA Splicing: Aberrant Splicing Regulation and Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 923
Author(s):  
Koji Kitamura ◽  
Keisuke Nimura

RNA splicing is a critical step in the maturation of precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) by removing introns and exons. The combination of inclusion and exclusion of introns and exons in pre-mRNA can generate vast diversity in mature mRNA from a limited number of genes. Cancer cells acquire cancer-specific mechanisms through aberrant splicing regulation to acquire resistance to treatment and to promote malignancy. Splicing regulation involves many factors, such as proteins, non-coding RNAs, and DNA sequences at many steps. Thus, the dysregulation of splicing is caused by many factors, including mutations in RNA splicing factors, aberrant expression levels of RNA splicing factors, small nuclear ribonucleoproteins biogenesis, mutations in snRNA, or genomic sequences that are involved in the regulation of splicing, such as 5’ and 3’ splice sites, branch point site, splicing enhancer/silencer, and changes in the chromatin status that affect the splicing profile. This review focuses on the dysregulation of RNA splicing related to cancer and the associated therapeutic methods.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Escobar-Hoyos ◽  
Katherine Knorr ◽  
Omar Abdel-Wahab

RNA splicing, the enzymatic process of removing segments of premature RNA to produce mature RNA, is a key mediator of proteome diversity and regulator of gene expression. Increased systematic sequencing of the genome and transcriptome of cancers has identified a variety of means by which RNA splicing is altered in cancer relative to normal cells. These findings, in combination with the discovery of recurrent change-of-function mutations in splicing factors in a variety of cancers, suggest that alterations in splicing are drivers of tumorigenesis. Greater characterization of altered splicing in cancer parallels increasing efforts to pharmacologically perturb splicing and early-phase clinical development of small molecules that disrupt splicing in patients with cancer. Here we review recent studies of global changes in splicing in cancer, splicing regulation of mitogenic pathways critical in cancer transformation, and efforts to therapeutically target splicing in cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 11618
Author(s):  
Anna L. Schorr ◽  
Marco Mangone

Alternative RNA splicing is an important regulatory process used by genes to increase their diversity. This process is mainly executed by specific classes of RNA binding proteins that act in a dosage-dependent manner to include or exclude selected exons in the final transcripts. While these processes are tightly regulated in cells and tissues, little is known on how the dosage of these factors is achieved and maintained. Several recent studies have suggested that alternative RNA splicing may be in part modulated by microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short, non-coding RNAs (~22 nt in length) that inhibit translation of specific mRNA transcripts. As evidenced in tissues and in diseases, such as cancer and neurological disorders, the dysregulation of miRNA pathways disrupts downstream alternative RNA splicing events by altering the dosage of splicing factors involved in RNA splicing. This attractive model suggests that miRNAs can not only influence the dosage of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level but also indirectly interfere in pre-mRNA splicing at the co-transcriptional level. The purpose of this review is to compile and analyze recent studies on miRNAs modulating alternative RNA splicing factors, and how these events contribute to transcript rearrangements in tissue development and disease.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 738-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiro Togami ◽  
Vikas Madan ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Alexandra-Chloe Villani ◽  
Siranush Sarkizova ◽  
...  

Abstract Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an aggressive malignancy thought to result from transformation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Clinical outcomes are poor and pathogenesis is unclear. To better understand BPDCN genomics and disease mechanisms, we performed whole exome- (12 BPDCNs), targeted DNA- (additional 12 BPDCNs), bulk whole transcriptome RNA- (12 BPDCNs and 6 BPDCN patient-derived xenografts [PDXs]), and single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) compared to normal DCs. We observed RNA splicing factor mutations in 16/24 cases (7 ZRSR2, 6 SRSF2, 1 each SF3B1, U2AF1, SF3A2, SF3B4). Additional recurrent alterations were in genes known to be mutated in other blood cancers: TET2, ASXL1, TP53, GNB1, NRAS, IDH2, ETV6, DNMT3A, and RUNX1. From exome sequencing we also discovered recurrent mutations in CRIPAK (6/12 cases), NEFH (4/12), HNF1A (2/12), PAX3 (2/12), and SSC5D (2/12) that may be unique to BPDCN. ZRSR2 is notable among the recurrently mutated splicing factors in hematologic malignancies in that all mutations are loss-of-function (e.g., nonsense, frameshift). Of note, BPDCN is very male predominant, ZRSR2 is located on chrX and all mutations are in males. ZRSR2 plays a critical role in "minor" or U12-type intron splicing (only 0.3% of all introns). Thus, we hypothesized that mis-splicing, possibly of U12 genes, contributes to BPDCN pathogenesis. Using RNA-seq, we measured aberrant splicing in BPDCN. Intron retention was the most frequent abnormality in ZRSR2 mutant BPDCNs and PDXs compared to non-mutant cases. ZRSR2 mutant intron retention predominantly affected U12 introns (patients: 29.4% of retained introns, P<0.0001; PDX: 94%, P<0.0001). To test if ZRSR2 loss directly causes U12 intron retention in otherwise isogenic cells, we performed ZRSR2 knockdown using doxycycline-inducible shRNAs in the BPDCN cell line, CAL1, which has no known splicing factor mutation. RNA-seq was performed 0, 2, and 7 days after addition of doxycycline in 3 independent clones each of control or ZRSR2 knockdown. Consistent with what we observed in primary BPDCN, intron retention events were higher in ZRSR2 compared to control shRNA cells after 7 days of doxycycline (mean 885.7 vs 122.7 events, P=0.041). Aberrant intron retention after ZRSR2 knockdown largely involved U12 introns (30/732 U12 vs 37/207,344 U2 introns, P<0.0001). SRSF2 and SF3B1 mutations in BPDCN were at hotspots seen in other cancers: SRSF2 P95H/L/R and SF3B1 K666N, mutants that induce specific types of aberrant splicing (Kim, Ca Cell 2015; Darman, Cell Rep 2015). Mutant BPDCNs demonstrated the same aberrations: SRSF2, exon inclusion/exclusion based on CCNG/GGNG exonic splicing enhancer motifs; SF3B1, aberrant 3' splice site recognition. We hypothesized that aberrant splicing may affect RNAs important for pDC development or function. To further define genes uniquely important in BPDCN, we performed scRNA-seq on 4 BPDCNs and on DCs from healthy donors. By principal component analysis, BPDCNs were more similar to pDCs than to conventional DCs (cDCs) or other HLA-DR+ cells. However, several critical genes for pDC function had markedly lower expression in BPDCN including the transcription factors IRF4 and IRF7. Next we determined which genes were commonly mis-spliced in splicing factor mutant BPDCNs. Strikingly, this list included genes already known to be important in driving DC biology or identified in our scRNA-seq as being differentially expressed between BPDCN and healthy pDCs, including IRF7, IRF8, IKZF1, FLT3, and DERL3. To determine if splicing factor mutations affect DC function, we stimulated ZRSR2 knockdown or control CAL1 cells with Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, 8, and 9 agonists (R848 or CpG oligo). ZRSR2 knockdown inhibited upregulation of the CD80 costimulatory molecule and aggregation of CAL1 cells, suggesting impairment in activation. Using mouse conditional knock-in bone marrow in ex vivo multipotent progenitor assays, DC differentiation induced by FLT3 ligand was biased toward pDCs and away from cDCs in SRSF2 P95H mutant compared to wild-type cells. However, cDC and monocyte differentiation in the presence of GM-CSF was not affected. In conclusion, splicing factors are frequently mutated in BPDCN and lead to specific splicing defects. Splicing factor mutations may promote BPDCN by affecting pathways important in DC maturation or activation, which could contribute to transformation. Disclosures Seiler: H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Buonamici:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Lane:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; N-of-1: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Sato ◽  
Ken-ichi Takayama ◽  
Makoto Hashimoto ◽  
Satoshi Inoue

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-associated neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive impairment of memory, thinking, behavior, and dementia. Based on ample evidence showing neurotoxicity of amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates in AD, proteolytically derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP), it has been assumed that misfolding of Aβ plays a crucial role in the AD pathogenesis. Additionally, extra copies of the APP gene caused by chromosomal duplication in patients with Down syndrome can promote AD pathogenesis, indicating the pathological involvement of the APP gene dose in AD. Furthermore, increased APP expression due to locus duplication and promoter mutation of APP has been found in familial AD. Given this background, we aimed to summarize the mechanism underlying the upregulation of APP expression levels from a cutting-edge perspective. We first reviewed the literature relevant to this issue, specifically focusing on the transcriptional regulation of APP by transcription factors that bind to the promoter/enhancer regions. APP expression is also regulated by growth factors, cytokines, and hormone, such as androgen. We further evaluated the possible involvement of post-transcriptional regulators of APP in AD pathogenesis, such as RNA splicing factors. Indeed, alternative splicing isoforms of APP are proposed to be involved in the increased production of Aβ. Moreover, non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs, post-transcriptionally regulate the APP expression. Collectively, elucidation of the novel mechanisms underlying the upregulation of APP would lead to the development of clinical diagnosis and treatment of AD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Ajiro ◽  
Tomonari Awaya ◽  
Young Jin Kim ◽  
Kei Iida ◽  
Masatsugu Denawa ◽  
...  

AbstractApproximately half of genetic disease-associated mutations cause aberrant splicing. However, a widely applicable therapeutic strategy to splicing diseases is yet to be developed. Here, we analyze the mechanism whereby IKBKAP-familial dysautonomia (FD) exon 20 inclusion is specifically promoted by a small molecule splice modulator, RECTAS, even though IKBKAP-FD exon 20 has a suboptimal 5′ splice site due to the IVS20 + 6 T > C mutation. Knockdown experiments reveal that exon 20 inclusion is suppressed in the absence of serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 6 (SRSF6) binding to an intronic splicing enhancer in intron 20. We show that RECTAS directly interacts with CDC-like kinases (CLKs) and enhances SRSF6 phosphorylation. Consistently, exon 20 splicing is bidirectionally manipulated by targeting cellular CLK activity with RECTAS versus CLK inhibitors. The therapeutic potential of RECTAS is validated in multiple FD disease models. Our study indicates that small synthetic molecules affecting phosphorylation state of SRSFs is available as a new therapeutic modality for mechanism-oriented precision medicine of splicing diseases.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Flavia Zita Francies ◽  
Sheynaz Bassa ◽  
Aristotelis Chatziioannou ◽  
Andreas Martin Kaufmann ◽  
Zodwa Dlamini

Gynaecological cancers are attributed to the second most diagnosed cancers in women after breast cancer. On a global scale, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the most common cancer in developing countries with rapidly increasing mortality rates. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major contributor to the disease. HPV infections cause prominent cellular changes including alternative splicing to drive malignant transformation. A fundamental characteristic attributed to cancer is the dysregulation of cellular transcription. Alternative splicing is regulated by several splicing factors and molecular changes in these factors lead to cancer mechanisms such as tumour development and progression and drug resistance. The serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins and heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) have prominent roles in modulating alternative splicing. Evidence shows molecular alteration and expression levels in these splicing factors in cervical cancer. Furthermore, aberrant splicing events in cancer-related genes lead to chemo- and radioresistance. Identifying clinically relevant modifications in alternative splicing events and splicing variants, in cervical cancer, as potential biomarkers for their role in cancer progression and therapy resistance is scrutinised. This review will focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying the aberrant splicing events in cervical cancer that may serve as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and novel drug targets.


2004 ◽  
Vol 127A (3) ◽  
pp. 268-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyne M. Lew ◽  
Yan Ling Fei ◽  
Kirk Aleck ◽  
Benjamin J. Blencowe ◽  
Rosanna Weksberg ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 4687-4700 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kate Dredge ◽  
Robert B. Darnell

ABSTRACT Nova is a neuron-specific RNA binding protein targeted in patients with the autoimmune disorder paraneoplastic opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia, which is characterized by failure of inhibition of brainstem and spinal motor systems. Here, we have biochemically confirmed the observation that splicing regulation of the inhibitory GABAA receptor γ2 (GABAARγ2) subunit pre-mRNA exon E9 is disrupted in mice lacking Nova-1. To elucidate the mechanism by which Nova-1 regulates GABAARγ2 alternative splicing, we systematically screened minigenes derived from the GABAARγ2 and human β-globin genes for their ability to support Nova-dependent splicing in transient transfection assays. These studies demonstrate that Nova-1 acts directly on GABAARγ2 pre-mRNA to regulate E9 splicing and identify an intronic region that is necessary and sufficient for Nova-dependent enhancement of exon inclusion, which we term the NISE (Nova-dependent intronic splicing enhancer) element. The NISE element (located 80 nucleotides upstream of the splice acceptor site of the downstream exon E10) is composed of repeats of the sequence YCAY, consistent with previous studies of the mechanism by which Nova binds RNA. Mutation of these repeats abolishes binding of Nova-1 to the RNA in vitro and Nova-dependent splicing regulation in vivo. These data provide a molecular basis for understanding Nova regulation of GABAARγ2 alternative splicing and suggest that general dysregulation of Nova's splicing enhancer function may underlie the neurologic defects seen in Nova's absence.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 662-662
Author(s):  
Naranie Shanmuganathan ◽  
Daniel Thomson ◽  
Carol Wadham ◽  
Verity A Saunders ◽  
Nur Hezrin Shahrin ◽  
...  

Background Mutated cancer genes in patients (pts) with TKI failure and blast crisis (BC) CML have recently been described. RUNX1 mutations, namely single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels, were the most frequently detected besides BCR-ABL1 [reviewed in Branford, Kim Leuk 2019]. They were found in ~18% of pts, although splice variants were rarely described. RNA splicing events were associated with focal deletion of IKZF1 and RUNX1 in TKI resistant pts that were identified by copy number analysis and RNAseq [Branford Blood 2018]. Novel splicing associated with mutation of cancer genes is an unexplored area of study in resistance. RNA sequencing can assess the functional effect of splice site variants, which lead to splicing errors due to the use of alternative or cryptic splice sites and cause alterations to protein function. Aim We determined whether novel splicing can identify cancer genes with potential altered function. Methods RNAseq analysis was performed for 48 pts at diagnosis and 33 at BC using a protocol that preserved intron-retaining precursor RNA. Coverage of intron-exon borders was sufficient to detect intronic splice region variants. The STAR aligner was used to bioinformatically collate unannotated RNA splice junctions. 54 cancer genes were assessed and aberrant splice events were filtered based on the number of samples in which a splice junction occurred. Manual inspection of the splice junctions was performed using the Integrative Genomics Viewer. This approach identified previously verified aberrant splicing associated with IKZF1 and RUNX1 deletions. Results Ten previously undetected novel splice junctions were revealed in 9/33 pts (27%) in BC within key tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A/B (5), RB1 (1), ATM (1), and RUNX1 (3). The aberrant splicing pattern of CDKN2A and RB1 (Fig A/B) in 6 pts suggested large deletions, as previously described in our cohort with IKZF1 and RUNX1 deletions. Breakpoints associated with deletions ranging from 53 to 181 Kb were detected in the 5 pts with CDKN2A aberrant splicing. Similarly, a 90 Kb deletion of exons 18-27 of the RB1 gene led to the aberrant splicing. The pts transformed to lymphoid BC (median 5 months). 4 of these 6 pts were tested at diagnosis and the deletions were not detected, indicating they were gained at resistance. The aberrant splicing patterns of ATM and RUNX1 did not predict large deletions. These were related to somatic SNVs at canonical splice sites in ATM and in 2 of the pts with RUNX1 aberrant splicing. A splice acceptor site SNV in ATM resulted in skipping of exon 61 (Fig C) and protein truncation. This novel SNV has not been reported in any population or somatic variant database. Two pts in myeloid BC at 28 and 48 months after diagnosis had an identical somatic RUNX1 mutation at the canonical splice donor site of exon 5. The SNV was not detectable prior to imatinib treatment in both pts. The splice site SNV led to activation of a cryptic splice site within exon 5 in both pts (Fig D), which predicted premature termination. While this mutation is novel, an adjacent intronic SNV occurs in familial platelet disorder, leading to activation of the same cryptic splice site. The atypical RUNX1 splicing of the 3rd patient was associated with retention of 55 bp of intron 6 as a cryptic exon (Fig E), leading to protein truncation. A deep intronic SNV identified at lymphoid BC at 6 months of imatinib was detected near the cryptic exon by RNAseq and verified as somatic by DNA Sanger sequencing. This was predicted to activate cryptic RNA splicing elements and lead to intron sequence retention in a RUNX1 transcript. We sequenced the diagnosis sample using an RNA-based gene panel method under development that provides enhanced sensitivity of variant detection. The same pattern of atypical splicing was observed and the intronic SNV was present at low level. The RUNX1 mutation at diagnosis may have contributed to early BC. To our knowledge this is the first report of a RUNX1 truncating variant in CML involving a cryptic exon. Conclusion Enhanced bioinformatic analysis of RNAseq data has revealed a high proportion of pts with truncating mutations in cancer genes indicated by novel RNA splicing (27% pts in BC). Using RNA-based sequencing allows an evaluation of the potential functional effect of variants that are not apparent by DNA-based mutation analysis. We suggest that future studies include RNA sequencing to detect a broader spectrum of mutations associated with TKI resistance. Disclosures Shanmuganathan: Gilead: Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Other: Travel Support; Amgen: Other: Travel Support; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Yeung:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Scott:Celgene: Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel. Branford:Cepheid: Consultancy, Honoraria; Qiagen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document