scholarly journals How (5′S) and (5′R) 5′,8-Cyclo-2′-Deoxypurines Affect Base Excision Repair of Clustered DNA Damage in Nuclear Extracts of xrs5 Cells? A Biochemical Study

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 725
Author(s):  
Karolina Boguszewska ◽  
Michał Szewczuk ◽  
Julia Kaźmierczak-Barańska ◽  
Bolesław T. Karwowski
Keyword(s):  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Ap Sites ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ap Site

The clustered DNA lesions (CDLs) are a characteristic feature of ionizing radiation’s impact on the human genetic material. CDLs impair the efficiency of cellular repair machinery, especially base excision repair (BER). When CDLs contain a lesion repaired by BER (e.g., apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites) and a bulkier 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxypurine (cdPu), which is not a substrate for BER, the repair efficiency of the first one may be affected. The cdPus’ influence on the efficiency of nuclear BER in xrs5 cells have been investigated using synthetic oligonucleotides with bi-stranded CDL (containing (5′S) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (ScdA), (5′R) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (RcdA), (5′S) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine (ScdG) or (5′R) 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine (RcdG) in one strand and an AP site in the other strand at different interlesion distances). Here, for the first time, the impact of ScdG and RcdG was experimentally tested in the context of nuclear BER. This study shows that the presence of RcdA inhibits BER more than ScdA; however, ScdG decreases repair level more than RcdG. Moreover, AP sites located ≤10 base pairs to the cdPu on its 5′-end side were repaired less efficiently than AP sites located ≤10 base pairs on the 3′-end side of cdPu. The strand with an AP site placed opposite cdPu or one base in the 5′-end direction was not reconstituted for cdA nor cdG. CdPus affect the repair of the other lesion within the CDL. It may translate to a prolonged lifetime of unrepaired lesions leading to mutations and impaired cellular processes. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring this subject in more detail.

scholarly journals The Influence of 5′,8-Cyclo-2′-deoxypurines on the Mitochondrial Repair of Clustered DNA Damage in Xrs5 Cells: The Preliminary Study

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 7042
Author(s):  
Karolina Boguszewska ◽  
Julia Kaźmierczak-Barańska ◽  
Bolesław T. Karwowski
Keyword(s):  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Apurinic Site ◽  
Ap Sites ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
First Time ◽  
Ap Site ◽  
Clustered Dna Damage ◽  
Single Lesion

The 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxypurines (cdPus) affect the DNA structure. When these bulky structures are a part of clustered DNA lesions (CDL), they affect the repair of the other lesions within the cluster. Mitochondria are crucial for cell survival and have their own genome, hence, are highly interesting in the context of CDL repair. However, no studies are exploring this topic. Here, the initial stages of mitochondrial base excision repair (mtBER) were considered—the strand incision and elongation. The repair of a single lesion (apurinic site (AP site)) accompanying the cdPu within the double-stranded CDL has been investigated for the first time. The type of cdPu, its diastereomeric form, and the interlesion distance were taken into consideration. For these studies, the established experimental model of short oligonucleotides (containing AP sites located ≤7 base pairs to the cdPu in both directions) and mitochondrial extracts of the xrs5 cells were used. The obtained results have shown that the presence of cdPus influenced the processing of an AP site within the CDL. Levels of strand incision and elongation were higher for oligos containing RcdA and ScdG than for those with ScdA and RcdG. Investigated stages of mtBER were more efficient for DNA containing AP sites located on 5′-end side of cdPu than on its 3′-end side. In conclusion, the presence of cdPus in mtDNA structure may affect mtBER (processing the second mutagenic lesion within the CDL). As impaired repair processes may lead to serious biological consequences, further studies concerning the mitochondrial repair of CDL are highly demanded.

scholarly journals When UDG and hAPE1 Meet Cyclopurines. How (5′R) and (5′S) 5′,8-Cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine and 5′,8-Cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine Affect UDG and hAPE1 Activity?

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 5177
Author(s):  
Michał Szewczuk ◽  
Karolina Boguszewska ◽  
Julia Kaźmierczak-Barańska ◽  
Bolesław T. Karwowski
Keyword(s):  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Uracil Dna Glycosylase ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Base Excision Repair System ◽  
Synthetic Oligonucleotides ◽  
Ap Site

Ionizing radiation is a factor that seriously damages cellular mechanisms/macromolecules, e.g., by inducing damage in the human genome, such as 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxypurines (cdPus). CdPus may become a component of clustered DNA lesions (CDL), which are notably unfavorable for the base excision repair system (BER). In this study, the influence of 5′S and 5′R diastereomers of 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (cdA) and 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyguanosine (cdG) on the uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) and human AP site endonuclease 1 (hAPE1) activity has been taken under consideration. Synthetic oligonucleotides containing 2′-deoxyuridine (dU) and cdPu were used as a model of single-stranded CDL. The activity of the UDG and hAPE1 enzymes decreased in the presence of RcdG compared to ScdG. Contrary to the above, ScdA reduced enzyme activity more than RcdA. The presented results show the influence of cdPus lesions located within CDL on the activity of the initial stages of BER dependently on their position toward dU. Numerous studies have shown the biological importance of cdPus (e.g., as a risk of carcinogenesis). Due to that, it is important to understand how to recognize and eliminate this type of DNA damage from the genome.

scholarly journals The Influence of (5′R)- and (5′S)-5′,8-Cyclo-2′-Deoxyadenosine on UDG and hAPE1 Activity. Tandem Lesions are the Base Excision Repair System’s Nightmare

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karwowski
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Base Excision Repair System ◽  
Tandem Lesions ◽  
Ap Site

DNA lesions are formed continuously in each living cell as a result of environmental factors, ionisation radiation, metabolic processes, etc. Most lesions are removed from the genome by the base excision repair system (BER). The activation of the BER protein cascade starts with DNA damage recognition by glycosylases. Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is one of the most evolutionary preserved glycosylases which remove the frequently occurring 2′-deoxyuridine from single (ss) and double-stranded (ds) oligonucleotides. Conversely, the unique tandem lesions (5′R)- and (5′S)-5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine (cdA) are not suitable substrates for BER machinery and are released from the genome by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system. However, the cyclopurines appearing in a clustered DNA damage structure can influence the BER process of other lesions like dU. In this article, UDG inhibition by 5′S- and 5′R-cdA is shown and discussed in an experimental and theoretical manner. This phenomenon was observed when a tandem lesion appears in single or double-stranded oligonucleotides next to dU, on its 3′-end side. The cdA shift to the 5′-end side of dU in ss-DNA stops this effect in both cdA diastereomers. Surprisingly, in the case of ds-DNA, 5′S-cdA completely blocks uracil excision by UDG. Conversely, 5′R-cdA allows glycosylase for uracil removal, but the subsequently formed apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is not suitable for human AP-site endonuclease 1 (hAPE1) activity. In conclusion, the appearance of the discussed tandem lesion in the structure of single or double-stranded DNA can stop the entire base repair process at its beginning, which due to UDG and hAPE1 inhibition can lead to mutagenesis. On the other hand, the presented results can cast some light on the UDG or hAPE1 inhibitors being used as a potential treatment.

scholarly journals Abasic Sites in the Transcribed Strand of Yeast DNA Are Removed by Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 3206-3215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayun Kim ◽  
Sue Jinks-Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Abasic Sites ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Ap Sites ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Ap Site

ABSTRACT Abasic (AP) sites are potent blocks to DNA and RNA polymerases, and their repair is essential for maintaining genome integrity. Although AP sites are efficiently dealt with through the base excision repair (BER) pathway, genetic studies suggest that repair also can occur via nucleotide excision repair (NER). The involvement of NER in AP-site removal has been puzzling, however, as this pathway is thought to target only bulky lesions. Here, we examine the repair of AP sites generated when uracil is removed from a highly transcribed gene in yeast. Because uracil is incorporated instead of thymine under these conditions, the position of the resulting AP site is known. Results demonstrate that only AP sites on the transcribed strand are efficient substrates for NER, suggesting the recruitment of the NER machinery by an AP-blocked RNA polymerase. Such transcription-coupled NER of AP sites may explain previously suggested links between the BER pathway and transcription.

scholarly journals Alleviation of C⋅C Mismatches in DNA by the Escherichia coli Fpg Protein

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almaz Nigatu Tesfahun ◽  
Marina Alexeeva ◽  
Miglė Tomkuvienė ◽  
Aysha Arshad ◽  
Prashanna Guragain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Thymine Glycol ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Primary Substrate

DNA polymerase III mis-insertion may, where not corrected by its 3′→ 5′ exonuclease or the mismatch repair (MMR) function, result in all possible non-cognate base pairs in DNA generating base substitutions. The most thermodynamically unstable base pair, the cytosine (C)⋅C mismatch, destabilizes adjacent base pairs, is resistant to correction by MMR in Escherichia coli, and its repair mechanism remains elusive. We present here in vitro evidence that C⋅C mismatch can be processed by base excision repair initiated by the E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) protein. The kcat for C⋅C is, however, 2.5 to 10 times lower than for its primary substrate 8-oxoguanine (oxo8G)⋅C, but approaches those for 5,6-dihydrothymine (dHT)⋅C and thymine glycol (Tg)⋅C. The KM values are all in the same range, which indicates efficient recognition of C⋅C mismatches in DNA. Fpg activity was also exhibited for the thymine (T)⋅T mismatch and for N4- and/or 5-methylated C opposite C or T, Fpg activity being enabled on a broad spectrum of DNA lesions and mismatches by the flexibility of the active site loop. We hypothesize that Fpg plays a role in resolving C⋅C in particular, but also other pyrimidine⋅pyrimidine mismatches, which increases survival at the cost of some mutagenesis.

Response of Base Excision Repair Enzymes to Complex DNA Lesions

2001 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Weinfeld ◽  
A. Rasouli-Nia ◽  
M. A. Chaudhry ◽  
R. A. Britten
Keyword(s):  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Base Excision

scholarly journals Reduced Nuclease Activity of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease (APE1) Variants on Nucleosomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 290 (34) ◽  
pp. 21067-21075 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hinz ◽  
Peng Mao ◽  
Daniel R. McNeill ◽  
David M. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Excision Repair ◽  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Nucleosome Core Particle ◽  
Nucleosome Core ◽  
Efficient Processing ◽  
Ap Sites ◽  
Mammalian Enzyme ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Dna Complex ◽  
Ap Site

Non-coding apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are generated at high frequency in genomic DNA via spontaneous hydrolytic, damage-induced or enzyme-mediated base release. AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) is the predominant mammalian enzyme responsible for initiating removal of mutagenic and cytotoxic abasic lesions as part of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. We have examined here the ability of wild-type (WT) and a collection of variant/mutant APE1 proteins to cleave at an AP site within a nucleosome core particle. Our studies indicate that, in comparison to the WT protein and other variant/mutant enzymes, the incision activity of the tumor-associated variant R237C and the rare population variant G241R are uniquely hypersensitive to nucleosome complexes in the vicinity of the AP site. This defect appears to stem from an abnormal interaction of R237C and G241R with abasic DNA substrates, but is not simply due to a DNA binding defect, as the site-specific APE1 mutant Y128A, which displays markedly reduced AP-DNA complex stability, did not exhibit a similar hypersensitivity to nucleosome structures. Notably, this incision defect of R237C and G241R was observed on a pre-assembled DNA glycosylase·AP-DNA complex as well. Our results suggest that the BER enzyme, APE1, has acquired distinct surface residues that permit efficient processing of AP sites within the context of protein-DNA complexes independent of classic chromatin remodeling mechanisms.

scholarly journals The mechanism of gap creation by a multifunctional nuclease during base excision repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (29) ◽  
pp. eabg0076
Author(s):  
Jungmin Yoo ◽  
Donghun Lee ◽  
Hyeryeon Im ◽  
Sangmi Ji ◽  
Sanghoon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Ap Endonuclease ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Gap Creation ◽  
Ap Site

During base excision repair, a transient single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gap is produced at the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. Exonuclease III, capable of performing both AP endonuclease and exonuclease activity, are responsible for gap creation in bacteria. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer to examine the mechanism of gap creation. We found an AP site anchor-based mechanism by which the intrinsically distributive enzyme binds strongly to the AP site and becomes a processive enzyme, rapidly creating a gap and an associated transient ssDNA loop. The gap size is determined by the rigidity of the ssDNA loop and the duplex stability of the DNA and is limited to a few nucleotides to maintain genomic stability. When the 3′ end is released from the AP endonuclease, polymerase I quickly initiates DNA synthesis and fills the gap. Our work provides previously unidentified insights into how a signal of DNA damage changes the enzymatic functions.

scholarly journals Role of Base Excision Repair Pathway in the Processing of Complex DNA Damage Generated by Oxidative Stress and Anticancer Drugs

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeldar Baiken ◽  
Damira Kanayeva ◽  
Sabira Taipakova ◽  
Regina Groisman ◽  
Alexander A. Ishchenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Base Excision

Chemical alterations in DNA induced by genotoxic factors can have a complex nature such as bulky DNA adducts, interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs), and clustered DNA lesions (including double-strand breaks, DSB). Complex DNA damage (CDD) has a complex character/structure as compared to singular lesions like randomly distributed abasic sites, deaminated, alkylated, and oxidized DNA bases. CDD is thought to be critical since they are more challenging to repair than singular lesions. Although CDD naturally constitutes a relatively minor fraction of the overall DNA damage induced by free radicals, DNA cross-linking agents, and ionizing radiation, if left unrepaired, these lesions cause a number of serious consequences, such as gross chromosomal rearrangements and genome instability. If not tightly controlled, the repair of ICLs and clustered bi-stranded oxidized bases via DNA excision repair will either inhibit initial steps of repair or produce persistent chromosomal breaks and consequently be lethal for the cells. Biochemical and genetic evidences indicate that the removal of CDD requires concurrent involvement of a number of distinct DNA repair pathways including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-mediated DNA strand break repair, base excision repair (BER), nucleotide incision repair (NIR), global genome and transcription coupled nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER and TC-NER, respectively), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) pathways. In this review, we describe the role of DNA glycosylase-mediated BER pathway in the removal of complex DNA lesions.

scholarly journals New perspectives in cancer biology from a study of canonical and non-canonical functions of base excision repair proteins with a focus on early steps

Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilde Clarissa Malfatti ◽  
Giulia Antoniali ◽  
Marta Codrich ◽  
Silvia Burra ◽  
Giovanna Mangiapane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Base Excision

Abstract Alterations of DNA repair enzymes and consequential triggering of aberrant DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are thought to play a pivotal role in genomic instabilities associated with cancer development, and are further thought to be important predictive biomarkers for therapy using the synthetic lethality paradigm. However, novel unpredicted perspectives are emerging from the identification of several non-canonical roles of DNA repair enzymes, particularly in gene expression regulation, by different molecular mechanisms, such as (i) non-coding RNA regulation of tumour suppressors, (ii) epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of genes involved in genotoxic responses and (iii) paracrine effects of secreted DNA repair enzymes triggering the cell senescence phenotype. The base excision repair (BER) pathway, canonically involved in the repair of non-distorting DNA lesions generated by oxidative stress, ionising radiation, alkylation damage and spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of nucleotide bases, represents a paradigm for the multifaceted roles of complex DDR in human cells. This review will focus on what is known about the canonical and non-canonical functions of BER enzymes related to cancer development, highlighting novel opportunities to understand the biology of cancer and representing future perspectives for designing new anticancer strategies. We will specifically focus on APE1 as an example of a pleiotropic and multifunctional BER protein.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document