scholarly journals Trabectedin Plus Radiotherapy for Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Experience in Forty Patients Treated at a Sarcoma Reference Center

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3740
Author(s):  
Nadia Hindi ◽  
Irene Carrasco García ◽  
Alberto Sánchez-Camacho ◽  
Antonio Gutierrez ◽  
Javier Peinado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Growth Modulation ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Symptomatic control and tumoral shrinkage is an unmet need in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients beyond first-line. The combination of trabectedin and radiotherapy showed activity in a recently reported clinical trial in this setting. This retrospective series aims to analyze our experience with the same regimen in the real-life setting. We retrospectively reviewed advanced sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin concomitantly with radiotherapy with palliative intent. Growth-modulation index (GMI) was calculated as a surrogate of efficacy. Forty metastatic patients were analyzed. According to RECIST, there was one (2.5%) complete response, 12 (30%) partial responses, 18 (45%) disease stabilizations, and nine (22.5%) progressions. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 2–38), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.5 months (95% CI 2.8–12.2) and 23.5 months (95% CI 1.1–45.8), respectively. Median GMI was 1.42 (range 0.19–23.76), and in 16 (53%) patients, it was >1.33. In patients with GMI >1.33, median OS was significantly longer than in those with GMI 0–1.33 (median OS 52.1 months (95% CI not reached) vs. 8.9 months (95% CI 6.3–11.6), p = 0.028). The combination of trabectedin plus radiotherapy is an active therapeutic option in patients with advanced STS, especially when tumor shrinkage for symptomatic relief is needed.

scholarly journals Trabectedin for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Non-Interventional, Retrospective, Multicenter Study of the Italian Sarcoma Group

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1053
Author(s):  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
Roberta Sanfilippo ◽  
Giovanni Grignani ◽  
Angela Buonadonna ◽  
Antonella Romanini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Bone Marrow Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The Italian Sarcoma Group performed this retrospective analysis of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, pretreated with ≥1 anthracycline-based treatment, and treated with trabectedin every three weeks. Primary endpoint was to describe real-life use of trabectedin across Italy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Overall, 512 patients from 20 Italian centers were evaluated. Leiomyosarcoma (37.7%)/liposarcoma (30.3%) were the most prevalent histological types (abbreviated as L-sarcoma). Patients received a median of four trabectedin cycles (range: 1–40), mostly as a second-line treatment (~60% of patients). The ORR was 13.7% superior (p < 0.0001) in patients with L-sarcoma compared with patients with non-L-sarcoma (16.6% vs. 9.0%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was 21.6 months. Significantly better PFS and OS were observed in patients with L-sarcoma, those with objective responses and/or disease stabilization, treated in an early line and treated with reduced dose. Bone marrow toxicity (61.4%) and transaminase increases (21.9%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. The results of this real-life study suggest that trabectedin is an active treatment, which is mostly given as a second-line treatment to patients with a good performance status and high-grade, metastatic L-sarcoma (clinical trial information: NCT02793050).

Trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma: Ten-year real-life perspective.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11060-11060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivan Shamai ◽  
Ofer Merimsky
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Significant Difference

11060 Background: Trabectedin is a marine - derived chemotherapy, which lately received FDA approval for use in anthracycline resistant advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), especially liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (L-sarcomas). Methods: We report our ten-year real-life experience with trabectedin, 1.5mg/m2/d c.i.v. q3w till progression, regarding safety and efficacy in a cohort of 86 patients (24-83y). Liposarcoma was the diagnosis in 46% , leiomyosarcoma in 43%. Results: A total of 703 cycles of Trabectedin were given, with a median of five cycles per patient (range 1-59). Median overall survival (mOS) was 11 months for liposarcoma patients (range 1-63), and 15 months for leiomyosarcoma patients (range 1-35). There was no statistically significant difference in progression free survival (PFS), when stratified according to previous treatment lines given. Trabectedin exhibited a favorable safety profile, with only 22% requiring dose reductions. Grade 3 and more toxicity were noted in 25% of the patients, mostly myelosuppression. There was no treatment related death. Conclusions: In contrast to former trials, our retrospective data represents real life experience with Trabectedin, and includes patients with diverse age, histology, performane status, prior treatments and tumor burden. The group includes 10 patients (11.6%) who received Trabectedin as first line (Either due to congestive heart failure or to rapid progression following adjuvant Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide), 10 patients (11.6%) were above age 70, nine (10.5%) had histologies other than liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, and 23 (26.7%) had ECOG PS of 2 or higher. Trabectedin is a safe and effective drug in advanced high grade STS. Further research is needed to identify which patients will benefit most.

Phase II Study of ET-743 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Le Cesne ◽  
J.Y. Blay ◽  
I. Judson ◽  
A. Van Oosterom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose This nonrandomized multicenter phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and safety of Ecteinascidin (ET-743) administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients with documented progressive advanced soft tissue sarcoma received ET-743 as second- or third-line chemotherapy. Antitumor activity was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression, excessive toxicity, or patient refusal. Results One hundred four patients from eight European institutions were included in the study (March 1999 to November 2000). A total of 410 cycles were administered in 99 assessable patients. Toxicity mainly involved reversible grade 3 to 4 asymptomatic elevation of transaminases in 40% of patients, and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 52% of patients. There were eight partial responses (PR; objective regression rate, 8%), 45 no change (NC; > 6 months in 26% of patients), and 39 progressive disease. A progression arrest rate (PR + NC) of 56% was observed in leiomyosarcoma and 61% in synovialosarcoma. The median duration of the time to progression was 105 days, and the 6-month progression-free survival was 29%. The median duration of survival was 9.2 months. Conclusion ET-743 seems to be a promising active agent in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with no cumulative toxicities. The 6-months progression-free survival observed in advanced soft tissue sarcoma compares favorably with those obtained with other active drugs tested in second-line chemotherapy in previous European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. The median overall survival was unusually long in these heavily pretreated patients mainly due to the high number of patients who benefit from the drug in terms of tumor control.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo (Pbo)-controlled phase III study of ombrabulin plus cisplatin in patients (pts) with advanced-stage soft-tissue sarcoma after failure of anthracycline and ifosfamide chemotherapies.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10506-10506
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Papai ◽  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Didier Cupissol ◽  
Antonio Lopez-Pousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Phase Iii Study

10506 Background: Ombrabulin (AVE8062) is a vascular disrupting agent that damages established tumor vasculature and has demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity with cisplatin in vivo. In a phase I study, ombrabulin 25 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² was identified as the recommended dose in pts with solid tumors (AACR 2008; Abs 08-AB-4925). This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ombrabulin plus cisplatin in pts with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (NCT00699517). Methods: Pts (aged ≥18 yrs, ECOG PS ≤2) with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma who had received prior anthracycline and ifosfamide, with ≤2 prior chemotherapies for advanced disease, were randomized (1:1) to receive either ombrabulin 25 mg/m² or Pbo plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between arms; secondary objectives included overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Overall, 355 pts (median age 52 yrs; 51.5% male) were randomized (176 ombrabulin, 179 Pbo) in 44 centers worldwide. Median duration of follow-up was 27.9 and 30.5 months in Pbo and ombrabulin arms, respectively. PFS analysis showed a statistically significant improvement with ombrabulin (median 1.54 vs 1.41 months Pbo; HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98; p=0.0302), with 3- and 6-month rates in favor of ombrabulin vs Pbo: 35.4% vs 24.9% and 19.3% vs 10.6%, respectively. A trend for an improvement with ombrabulin was observed in 3 of the 4 prespecified histology strata: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and “other”, but not for pleomorphic. Analysis of OS did not show statistically significant improvement with ombrabulin (median 11.43 vs 9.33 months Pbo, HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.67–1.09). OS rates at 1 year were in favor of ombrabulin (48.6% vs 42.4% Pbo). Grade 3/4 TEAEs more frequently seen with ombrabulin included neutropenia (19.2% vs 7.9% Pbo) and thrombocytopenia (8.5% vs 3.4% Pbo). Conclusions: Although this trial met its primary efficacy endpoint, the combination of ombrabulin and cisplatin did not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit in pts with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma to warrant further study. Clinical trial information: NCT00699517.

Cancer immunotherapy using trabectedin and nivolumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Kamalesh Kumar Sankhala ◽  
Nathan Stumpf ◽  
Joshua Ravicz ◽  
Suzan Arasheben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Myxoid Liposarcoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

40 Background: To restore innate tumor surveillance that is lost in cancer patients, a tumoricidal agent may have synergistic activity with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Herein, we report on a retrospective analysis of our clinical experience using trabectedin, an alkylating agent, and nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor in advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: Twenty previously treated STS patients received trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion, CIV, for 24 hours) every 3 weeks, and nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV over 30 minutes) every 2 weeks. Safety/toxicity was analyzed using the NIH/NCI CTCAE v.4.03. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1 and immune-related response criteria (irRECIST). Results: Histologic subtypes in 20 patients include undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS; n = 7), leiomyosarcoma (n = 5), synovial sarcoma (n = 2), myxoid liposarcoma (n = 4) and chondrosarcoma (n = 2). All patients had metastatic disease and a median of 4 lines of prior chemotherapy. Safety analysis (n = 20): Grade 3 treatment emergent adverse events include anemia (n = 2), fatigue (n = 1), decreased platelet count (n = 1), decreased granulocyte count (n = 1) and increased creatine kinase (n = 1). Efficacy analysis (n = 17): Seventeen patients were followed for at least 6 months and their results are reported here. There were 4 partial responses (UPS = 1, myxoid liposarcoma = 1, chondrosarcoma = 1, leiomyosarcoma = 1), 7 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease, with best overall response rate of 23.5%, median progression free survival (PFS) of > 11.6 months (range: 2.3- > 16.9 months), median overall survival (OS) of > 14.2 months (4.5- > 24.0 months), 6 month PFS rate of 64.7%, and 6 month OS rate of 94.1%. In a Phase 3 study, the median PFS was 4.2 months using trabectedin alone (Demetri et al., 2015). Conclusions: Taken together, the data suggest that paired administration of trabectedin and nivolumab is safe, and that this chemo-/immuno-therapy approach has synergistic activity.

scholarly journals Albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in soft tissue sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Tian ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Po Li ◽  
Jiaqiang Wang ◽  
Jinpo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the evidence and clinical data of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare. Methods: The clinical data of metastatic STS patients who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively analysed. All these patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in these patients. Results: A total of 17 patients treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine were enrolled in this study. 1 patient with angiosarcoma achieved complete response, 6 patients had partial response, 5 patients achieved stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. The average diameter change in target lesion from baseline was -19.06±45.74%. And median progression free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2–9 months). Grade 3 / 4 adverse events were not common, included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome of Systemic Treatment for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Real-Life Perspective in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 4215-4220
Author(s):  
Tomoki Nakamura ◽  
Kunihiro Asanuma ◽  
Tomohito Hagi ◽  
Akihiro Sudo
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

scholarly journals Real-World Experiences with Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma in Northern California

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Seto ◽  
Mee-Na Song ◽  
Maily Trieu ◽  
Jeanette Yu ◽  
Manpreet Sidhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Bone Sarcoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Northern California ◽  
Histologic Subtypes

Background: Pazopanib was approved for advanced soft tissue sarcoma as a second- or third-line therapy based on the clinical trial “Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma” (PALETTE). We hypothesized that the real-world experiences may be significantly different from the clinical trial results. Methods: We analyzed the response pattern of patients with advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma who received pazopanib treatment between 1 January 2011 and 31 October 2018 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Results: A total of 123 patients with 23 different histologic subtypes were assessable. One patient with low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma obtained complete response (CR) after 2 months of treatment with pazopanib, 12 patients (9.7%) obtained partial response (PR), 34 patients (27.6%) had stable disease (SD), while 76 patients (61.8%) developed progressive disease (PD). The disease control rate (DCR) was 46.3% (CR + PR + SD). Among the 12 patients with PR, 3 had undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 4 had leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 2 had pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 had pleomorphic liposarcoma, 1 had dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and 1 had angiosarcoma. The median duration of response was 9 months. Two patients with Ewing’s sarcoma had SD for 6 and 13 months, and two patients with osteosarcoma had SD for 6 and 9 months. Among 65 patients assessed at 8 weeks, 9 had a response, and 10 had SD. Among 104 patients assessed at 12 weeks, 12 had a response, and 26 had SD. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was approximately 3 months for all 123 cases and for patients with UPS and LMS. Conclusions: Our cohort of patients with advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma in Northern California treated with pazopanib had diverse histologic subtypes. The response rate (CR + PR) was higher than that of the PALETTE trial, while the DCR and the median PFS were significantly lower. The observation of PR in two patients with liposarcoma and durable SD in several patients with bone sarcoma indicates that pazopanib has activity in liposarcoma and bone sarcoma.

Phase III Trial of Two Investigational Schedules of Ifosfamide Compared With Standard-Dose Doxorubicin in Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3144-3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Lorigan ◽  
Jaap Verweij ◽  
Zsuzsa Papai ◽  
Sjoerd Rodenhuis ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Combining doxorubicin with standard-dose ifosfamide has not been shown to improve survival and is associated with a significantly increased toxicity; it is not known whether higher dose single-agent ifosfamide is superior to doxorubicin. Patients and Methods This randomized prospective multicenter phase III trial was designed to compare progression-free survival of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma receiving either regimen of standard doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 every 21 days, ifosfamide 9 g/m2 over 3 days continuous infusion, or ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day in 3 hours over 3 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate, and toxicity. Results The study included 326 patients. Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and encephalopathy were more frequent in the ifosfamide arms. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates were not significantly different between the three arms. An independent data monitoring committee reviewed the interim data and recommended early closure of the trial for futility (ie, no significant difference would be shown). Conclusion Single-agent doxorubicin remains the treatment of choice for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document