scholarly journals Comparing the Visual Perception According to the Performance Using the Eye-Tracking Technology in High-Fidelity Simulation Settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Issam Tanoubi ◽  
Mathieu Tourangeau ◽  
Komi Sodoké ◽  
Roger Perron ◽  
Pierre Drolet ◽  
...  

Introduction: We used eye-tracking technology to explore the visual perception of clinicians during a high-fidelity simulation scenario. We hypothesized that physicians who were able to successfully manage a critical situation would have a different visual focus compared to those who failed. Methods: A convenience sample of 18 first-year emergency medicine residents were enrolled voluntarily to participate in a high-fidelity scenario involving a patient in shock with a 3rd degree atrioventricular block. Their performance was rated as pass or fail and depended on the proper use of the pacing unit. Participants were wearing pre-calibrated eye-tracking glasses throughout the 9-min scenario and infrared (IR) markers installed in the simulator were used to define various Areas of Interest (AOI). Total View Duration (TVD) and Time to First Fixation (TFF) by the participants were recorded for each AOI and the results were used to produce heat maps. Results: Twelve residents succeeded while six failed the scenario. The TVD for the AOI containing the pacing unit was significantly shorter (median [quartile]) for those who succeeded compared to the ones who failed (42 [31–52] sec vs. 70 [61–90] sec, p = 0.0097). The TFF for the AOI containing the ECG and vital signs monitor was also shorter for the participants who succeeded than for those who failed (22 [6–28] sec vs. 30 [27–77] sec, p = 0.0182). Discussion: There seemed to be a connection between the gaze pattern of residents in a high-fidelity bradycardia simulation and their performance. The participants who succeeded looked at the monitor earlier (diagnosis). They also spent less time fixating the pacing unit, using it promptly to address the bradycardia. This study suggests that eye-tracking technology could be used to explore how visual perception, a key information-gathering element, is tied to decision-making and clinical performance.

Author(s):  
Alex (Sandy) MacQuarrie ◽  
Jayden R. Hunter ◽  
Samantha Sheridan ◽  
Amanda Hlushak ◽  
Clare Sutton ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251078
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Yu ◽  
Hye Jin Chang ◽  
Soon Sun Kim ◽  
Ji Eun Park ◽  
Wou Young Chung ◽  
...  

Introduction Psychological factors such as anxiety and confidence that students have in the patient care situation are important in that this affects the actual clinical performance. Students who are just starting clinical practice have a lack of clinical knowledge, skill proficiency, and patient communication skills, so they experience anxiety and lack of confidence in clinical setting. Practice in a safe environment, such as simulation education, can help students perform more settled and competently in patient care. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of high-fidelity simulation experience on anxiety and confidence in medical students. Materials and methods This study enrolled 37 5th-year students at Ajou University School of Medicine in 2020. Two simulation trainings were implemented, and a survey was conducted to measure students’ level of anxiety and confidence before and after each simulation. Based on the research data, a paired t-test was conducted to compare these variables before and after the simulation, and whether this was their first or second simulation experience. Results Students had a significantly lower level of anxiety and a significantly higher level of confidence after the simulation than before. In addition, after one simulation experience, students had less anxiety and more confidence before the second simulation compared to those without simulation experience. Conclusions We confirmed that medical students need to be repeatedly exposed to simulation education experiences in order to have a sense of psychological stability and to competently deliver medical treatment in a clinical setting. There is a practical limitation in that medical students do not have enough opportunities to meet the patients during clinical practice in hospitals. Therefore, in order to produce excellent doctors, students should have the expanded opportunities to experience simulation education so they can experience real-world medical conditions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Akbas ◽  
Sadiq Said ◽  
Tadzio Raoul Roche ◽  
Christoph Beat Nöthiger ◽  
Donat Rudolf Spahn ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Patient safety during anaesthesia is crucially dependent on the monitoring of vital signs. However, the values obtained must also be perceived and correctly classified by the attending care providers. To facilitate these processes, we developed Visual-Patient-avatar- an animated virtual model of the monitored patient, which innovatively presents numerical and waveform data following user-centred design principles. After a high-fidelity simulation study, we analysed participants' perceptions of three different monitor modalities, including this new technique. OBJECTIVE After a high-fidelity simulation study, we analysed participants' perceptions of three different monitor modalities, including this new technique. METHODS This study was a researcher-initiated, single-centre, qualitative study. We asked 92 care providers right after finishing three simulated emergency scenarios about their positive and negative opinions concerning the different monitor modalities. Following qualitative research methods, we processed the field notes obtained and derived main categories and corresponding subthemes. RESULTS We gained a total of 307 statements. Visual-Patient-avatar was the most occurring term in both positive and negative responses. We identified three main categories and divided them into eleven positive and negative subthemes. In assigning the statements to one of the topics, we achieved substantial inter-rater reliability. Most of the statements concerned the design and usability features of the avatar, respectively, the Split Screen mode. CONCLUSIONS This study qualitatively reviewed the clinical applicability of the Visual-Patient-avatar technique in a high-fidelity simulation study and revealed strengths and limitations of the avatar only und Split Screen modality. We received valuable suggestions for improving the design. The requirement of training before clinical implementation was reinforced. The responses regarding the Split Screen suggested that this symbiotic modality generates improved situation awareness combined with numerical data and accurate curves.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin A. Paloncy ◽  
Leah Georges ◽  
Allan J. Liggett

Context High-fidelity simulation can provide an ideal adjunct to clinical or real-world experience by providing a realistic and safe learning environment for the practice of low-incident encounters. Objective Given that levels of perceived self-efficacy are malleable and high-fidelity simulation can provide many positive outcomes, the purpose of this study was to determine whether participation in a high-fidelity simulated cardiovascular emergency scenario using the Laerdal SimMan in a university simulation center in the United States increased undergraduate athletic training students' self-efficacy scores. Design Cohort design with repeated measures. Patients or Other Participants Convenience sample of undergraduate athletic training students (n = 46) enrolled in a professional program at a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university in the Midwest. Intervention(s) Participation in or observation of a high-fidelity cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulation. Main Outcome Measure(s) Self-efficacy scores before, immediately after, and 6 months after simulation. Results There was a significant main effect for the 3 repeated measures, with the scores steadily increasing significantly from pretest (mean = 7.60, SD = 1.13) to posttest (mean = 8.04, SD = 1.22, P = .001), then again from immediate posttest to the 6-month posttest (mean = 8.38, SD = 1.04, P = .04). Scores among the participants (mean = 8.21, SD = 1.03) were not significantly higher than scores among the observers (mean = 7.85, SD = 1.40). Scores at the 6-month follow-up posttest (mean = 8.38, SD = 1.04) significantly increased from the posttest immediately after the simulation (P = .04). Conclusions Participating in or observing high-fidelity CPR simulation is an effective method of providing deliberate practice opportunities for athletic training students to increase self-efficacy related to CPR techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document