scholarly journals Different Soil Particle-Size Classification Systems for Calculating Volume Fractal Dimension—A Case Study of Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica in Mu Us Sandy Land, China

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jifeng Deng ◽  
Chengzhong Ma ◽  
Hongzhou Yu

Characterizing changes in the soil particle-size distributions (PSD) are a major issue in environmental research because it has a great impact on soil properties, soil management, and desertification. To date, the use of soil volume fractal dimension (D) is a feasible approach to describe PSD, and its calculation is mainly dependent on subdivisions of clay, silt, sand fractions as well as different soil particle-size classification (PSC) systems. But few studies have developed appropriate research works on how PSC systems affect the calculations of D. Therefore, in this study, topsoil (0–5 cm) across nine forest density gradients of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations (MPPs) ranging from 900–2700 trees ha–1 were selected in the Mu Us sandy land, China. The D of soil was calculated by measuring soil PSD through fractal model and laser diffraction technique. The experimental results showed that: (1) The predominant PSD was distributed within the sand classification followed by clay and silt particle contents, which were far less prevalent in the study area. The general order of D values (Ds) was USDA (1993) > ISO14688 (2002) > ISSS (1929) > Katschinski (1957) > China (1987) > Blott & Pye (2012) PSC systems. (2) Ds were significantly positively related to the contents of clay and silt, and Ds were significantly negatively to the sand content. Ds were susceptible to the MPPs establishment and forest densities. (3) Ds of six PSC systems were significantly positive correlated, which indicated that they not only have difference, but also have close connection. (4) According to the fractal model and descriptions of soil fractions under different PSC systems, refining scales of clay and sand fractions could increase Ds, while the refining scale of silt fraction could decrease Ds. From the conclusions above, it is highly recommended that USDA (1993) and Blott & Pye (2012) PSC systems be used as reliable and practical PSC systems for describing and calculating D of soil PSD.

2011 ◽  
Vol 201-203 ◽  
pp. 2679-2684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Yu Song ◽  
Huai You Li

It can provide theoretical guidance for the prevention of soil erosion and planting structure adjustment to study on fractal characteristics of soil particle-size distributions under different landform and land-use types. Soil particle-size distribution (PSD) is one of the most important physical attributes due to its strong influence on soil properties related to water movement, productivity and soil erosion. The fractal and multifractal measures were useful tools in identifying soil PSD with different taxonomy. Land-use type, as one of important factors to affect soil PSD was paid little attention in the previous research. In this paper, the theory of soil particle-size fractal was applied to characterize PSD in soils with the same taxonomy and different land-use types. Then the effects of land use on the fractal and multifractal parameters were analyzed. The study was conducted on the loess hilly areas of the Loess Plateau in Nanxiaohegou basin of Gansu. Soil was sampled from 18 land use types. The soil PSDs were obtained by sieving and pipette methods. The result showed that: (1) the mass fractal dimension of soil particles was significant correlated with the soil mass clay content; (2)both the soil mass clay content and the mass fractal dimension of soil particles showed the same tendency of increasing with the soil layer, and the mass fractal dimension relates to the land uses and topographic feature. Thus they could be potential parameters to reflect soil physical properties influenced by land use. More significant result is required in the future study to test the applicability of fractal parameters in characterizing land use effect on soil particle-size distributions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Lei Gao ◽  
Guo-Dong Ding ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Zhao ◽  
Bin Wu ◽  
Yu-Qing Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document