scholarly journals Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Application Maintenance Offshoring Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8550
Author(s):  
Hanif Ur Rahman ◽  
Mushtaq Raza ◽  
Palwasha Afsar ◽  
Abdullah Alharbi ◽  
Sultan Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Offshore Outsourcing ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The phenomenon of Global Software Development (GSD) has attracted the interest of businesses all over the world. It brings together partners from various national and corporate cultures to develop applications with numerous advantages, including access to a vast labor pool, cost savings, and round the clock growth. GSD, on the other hand, is technologically and organizationally diverse and poses a number of obstacles for the development team, such as geographical distance, cultural differences, communication and language barriers. Global services are provided by selecting one of the suitable global delivery options, i.e., the onshore model, nearshore model or offshore model. Experts typically choose one of the models based on the nature of the project and the needs of the customer. However, the vendors and clients lack an adequate decision support system that can assist them in making suitable sourcing decisions. Therefore, the current study presents a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model for offshore outsourcing decisions of application maintenance. To achieve our target, two systematic literature reviews were conducted that explored a list of 15 influencing factors. The identified factors were further evaluated in the outsourcing industry by performing an empirical study that resulted in a list of 10 critical success factors. We propose a sourcing framework based on the critical success factors that can assist decision makers in adopting a suitable sourcing strategy for the offshore outsourcing of application maintenance. In order to further enhance the decision-making process, the MCDM model is developed based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The MCDM model is evaluated with three case studies in highly reputable international companies, including IBM Stockholm, Sweden, Vattenfall AB, Stockholm, Sweden and a London based company in the United Kingdom. The outcomes of these case studies are further reviewed and validated by the outsourcing specialists in other firms. The proposed model is used as a decision support system that determines the ranking of sourcing alternatives and suggests the most suitable option for application maintenance offshoring.

scholarly journals Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Based Aggregation Mechanism for Resilience Measurement: NATO Aggregated Resilience Decision Support Model

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037
Author(s):  
Jan Hodicky ◽  
Gökhan Özkan ◽  
Hilmi Özdemir ◽  
Petr Stodola ◽  
Jan Drozd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Support System ◽  
Prototype Model ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Aggregation Mechanism ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Resilience is a complex system that represents dynamic behaviours through its complicated structure with various nodes, interrelations, and information flows. Like other international organizations NATO has also been dealing with the measurement of this complex phenomenon in order to have a comprehensive understanding of the civil environment and its impact on military operations. With this ultimate purpose, NATO had developed and executed a prototype model with the system dynamics modelling and simulation paradigm. NATO has created an aggregated resilience model as an upgrade of the prototype one, as discussed within this study. The structure of the model, aggregation mechanism and shock parametrization methodologies used in the development of the model comprise the scope of this study. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a multi-criteria decision-making technique is the methodology that is used for the development of the aggregation mechanism. The main idea of selecting the AHP methodology is its power and usefulness in mitigating bias in the decision-making process, its capability to increase the number of what-if scenarios to be created, and its contribution to the quality of causal explanations with the granularity it provides. The parametrized strategic shock input page, AHP-based weighted resilience and risk parameters input pages, one more country insertion to the model, and the decision support system page enhance the capacity of the prototype model. As part of the model, the decision support system page stands out as the strategic level cockpit where the colour codes give a clear idea at first about the overall situational picture and country-wise resilience and risk status. At the validation workshop, users not only validated the model but also discussed further development opportunities, such as adding more strategic shocks into the model and introduction of new parameters that will be determined by a big data analysis on relevant open source databases. The developed model has the potential to inspire high-level decision-makers dealing with resilience management in other international organizations, such as the United Nations.

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan SNMPTN Jalur Undangan Dengan Metode Electre

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Lidia K Simanjuntak ◽  
Tessa Y M Sihite ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Nuning Kurniasih ◽  
Yuhandri Yuhandri
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Prospective Students ◽  
College Entrance ◽  
Electre Method ◽  
Selection Of

All colleges each year organize the selection of new admissions. Acceptance of prospective students in universities as education providers is done by selecting prospective students based on achievement in school and college entrance selection. To select the best student candidates based on predetermined criteria, then use Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) or commonly called decision support system. One method in MCDM is the Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Reality (ELECTRE). The ELECTRE method is the best method of action selection. The ELECTRE method to obtain the best alternative by eliminating alternative that do not fit the criteria and can be applied to the decision SNMPTN invitation path.

SELEKSI ASISTEN PELATIH BELA DIRI DENGAN PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) DAN METODE SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 088
Author(s):  
Wahyu Joni Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Assistant Coach ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Discipline Knowledge

This study was conducted to assist in the selection of martial assistant coach, to determine who is right. Its results will didadaptkan by comparing the two methods in the decision support system, by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) in limiting the problems in producing the desired solution, using multiple criteria (multi-criteria). AHP and SAW has a different way of doing the calculation. This is done to determine which method is looking for help in making decisions. And in this study are the criteria Discipline, Knowledge, Leadership, Attitude, and Level. And there are sub criteria on Level, which Black (AND I) and Red Black II.

scholarly journals Decision Support System with Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 1933 (1) ◽  
pp. 012017
Author(s):  
Arman Jayady ◽  
Tonny Hidayat ◽  
Erni Qomariyah ◽  
BB Suriyani ◽  
Muh. Najib Husain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making

The Decision Support System in Selecting The Characteristics of Coffee By Using Analytic Hierarcy Process Method

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-63
Author(s):  
Novrini Hasti ◽  
Riswan Fitriyandi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Application ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Adequate Understanding ◽  
The Common ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Process Method

This study is to determine whether the characteristics of coffee flavor can be implemented into a decision support system. In this study, the problem is the difficulty in finding coffee experts with adequate understanding and knowledge of coffee. The purpose is to implement Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the characteristics of coffee flavor and to transfer the knowledge about the taste of coffee to coffee lovers. The expected results are to assist in making a decision support system application in selecting the characteristics of coffee, so that it can provide the advice to the common consumers who want to enjoy and the knowledge about the coffee itself as well.

scholarly journals DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM DETERMINES THE PURCHASE OF HOUSE RIGHT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) AND BORDA METHODS

JOURNAL ASRO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Didit Herdiawan Ashaf ◽  
Sutikno Wahyu Hidayat ◽  
Ahmadi Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Home Purchase ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Increasing population growth also contributes to the increasing need for homes or dwellings as basic human needs. Many ways people do to meet these needs, among others, by buying from someone else, building it yourself or by buying a house in a housing developer. Houses besides being a basic human need, it is also used as an indicator of one's success and as an asset for business development and an increase in the economic value of the owner. Prospective home buyers certainly have criteria that are considered in choosing a house. Many of the existing criteria are often followed by the availability of more than one choice of the house to be able to meet these criteria. Therefore, the writer tries to try to make a Decision Support System in a Home Purchase that will later help prospective home buyers in deciding which house to buy. The decision-making method used in this system is an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a form of decision-making model that is suitable for multi-criteria and multi-alternative problems with the main input being human perception. Combined with the Borda method which is one method of group decision making that can combine the results of perceptual analysis (the results of AHP analysis) from several decision makers. it is necessary to have a group decision-making technique (group decision support system). So that the resulting home purchase decision can be accepted by all decision makers (family). From the results of the calculation and voting process, House X was chosen with 9 votes.   Keywords: Home Purchase, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Borda

scholarly journals Decision Support System Budget Allocation Fund Village With AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) In the village of beehive

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Ilham Pramuja Nasution ◽  
Arjon Samuel Sitio
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Budget Allocation ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Village

The budget allocation of a village fund is very important and take big effect to village progress Because the office to distribute the tax result for village development. But, that allocation is not accurately. Therefore there was design a system to support a decision a budget allocation of village funds by using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This research done to the make-easy an office village in budgeting is the allocation of village funds. An method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of a method known as important as the highest level. An AHP method is look for the best alternative

scholarly journals Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Untuk Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik Pada DTPeduli Bekasi

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Irnawati Rasyid ◽  
Heri Kuswara ◽  
Anna Mukhayaroh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Ability To Work ◽  
Weight Value ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Process Method ◽  
Work Responsibility

Abstract   In the Assessment of Best Employees, DTPeduli Bekasi still uses a system whose criteria are still not clear in its value weighting and are still based on estimates from the leadership of the company. Moreover, the best employee assessment can be used as a reference for giving rewards / bonuses to employees. Therefore, a decision support system is needed for the process of selecting the best employees. This decision support system, can determine the calculated value of all criteria. This system uses the Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) method where this method is a method that can solve the problem of decision making based on many criteria. The DTPeduli Bekasi study has 13 criteria, namely Loyalty, Ability to work, Responsibility, Obedience, Honesty, Cooperation, Work Initiative, Communication, Discipline and attendance, and Appearance can be collaborated using the Analitycal Hierarchy Process method so that the linkages between criteria make the process of appraising employees best becomes easy.   Keywords: AHP, Criteria, Weight Value and Best Employee Assessment   Abstrak   Dalam Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik DTPeduli Bekasi masih meggunakan sistem yang kriterianya masih belum jelas pembobotan nilainya dan masih berdasarkan perkiraan dari pimpinan perusahaan. Terlebih lagi penilaian karyawan terbaik bisa digunakan sebagai acuan untuk pemberian reward/bonus kepada karyawan. Oleh karena itu diperlukan sistem pendukung keputusan untuk proses pemilihan karyawan terbaik tersebut. Sistem pendukung keputusan ini, dapat menentukan nilai perhitung terhadap semua kriteria. Sistem ini menggunakan metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dimana metode ini merupakan metode yang dapat menyelesaikan masalah pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan banyak kriteria. Pada studi DTPeduli Bekasi memiliki 13 kriteria yaitu Kesetiaan, Kemampuan akan pekerjaan, Tanggung jawab, Ketaatan, Kejujuran, Kerja sama, Inisiatif kerja, Komunikasi, Disiplin dan kehadiran, dan Penampilan dapat dikolaborasikan menggunakan metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process sehingga keterkaitan antara kriteria menjadikan proses penilaian karyawan terbaik menjadi mudah.   Kata kunci: AHP, Kriteria, Nilai Bobot dan Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document