scholarly journals Characterization of the Driving Style by State–Action Semantic Plane Based on the Bayesian Nonparametric Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 7857
Author(s):  
Xuqiang Qiao ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Yinong Li ◽  
Yuqing Ren ◽  
Zhida Zhang ◽  
...  

The quantification and estimation of the driving style are crucial to improve the safety on the road and the acceptance of drivers with level2–level3(L2–L3) intelligent vehicles. Previous studies have focused on identifying the difference in driving style between categories, without further consideration of the driving behavior frequency, duration proportion properties, and the transition properties between driving style and behaviors. In this paper, a novel methodology to characterize the driving style is proposed by using the State–Action semantic plane based on the Bayesian nonparametric approach, i.e., hierarchical Dirichlet process–hidden semi–Markov model (HDP–HSMM). This method segments the time series driving data into fragment clusters with similar characteristics and construct the State–Action semantic plane based on the statistical characteristics of the state and action layer to label and interpret the fragment clusters. This intuitively and simply visualizes the driving performance of individual drivers, while the risk index of the individual drivers can also be obtained through semantic plane. In addition, according to the joint mutual information maximization (JIMI) approach, seven transition probabilities of driving behaviors are extracted from the semantic plane and applied to identify driving styles of drivers. We found that the aggressive drivers prefer high–risk driving behaviors, and the total duration and frequency of high–risk behaviors are greater than those of cautious and normal drivers. The transition probabilities among high–risk driving behaviors are also greater compared with low–risk behaviors. Moreover, the transition probabilities can provide rich information about driving styles and can improve the classification accuracy of driving styles effectively. Our study has practical significance for the regulation of driving behavior and improvement of road safety and the development of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asghar Razmara ◽  
Teamur Aghamolaei ◽  
Zahra Hosseini ◽  
Abdolhossein Madani ◽  
Shahram Zare

Background: High-risk driving behaviors is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of educational intervention on promoting safe-driving behaviors and reducing high risk-driving behaviors in taxi drivers based on the health belief model and planned behavior theory. Methods: A quasi-experimental study of interventional and control drivers (n = 40) selected by a cluster sampling method was conducted. The participants were selected from taxi stations. The intervention group was divided into 4 groups, including 10 people. The contents of the training program were based on driving laws, avoiding high-risk behaviors, and advising on safe driving behaviors. The driving behaviors were measured at baseline and 3-month post-intervention. Constructs of the health belief model and theory of planned behavior were used as an interventional program framework. Independent t-test and Paired t-test were used to compare the scores between intervention and control drivers and the intervention group before and after the intervention at each of the variables, respectively. Results: Three months post-intervention, the scores of safe driving behaviors in the intervention group were higher than the control group, and high-risk driving behaviors in the intervention group were less than the control group. After the intervention, a significant difference was observed in the mean scores of perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control between two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Educational intervention within the framework of the combined constructs of the health belief model and theory of planned behavior can reduce high-risk driving behaviors and promote safe driving behaviors in taxi drivers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D. Williams ◽  
Jeff M. Housman ◽  
Conrad L. Woolsey ◽  
Thomas E. Sather

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 43654-43665
Author(s):  
Nuerzhegeti Aiyitibieke ◽  
Wenjun Wang ◽  
Nannan Wu ◽  
Ying Sun ◽  
Xuewei Li ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Javadi ◽  
Siyamak Tahmasebi ◽  
Taherh Azari Arghun ◽  
Forugh Edrisi ◽  
Esmaeil Soltani ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean T. Shope ◽  
Trivellore E. Raghunathan ◽  
Sujata M. Patil

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean T. Shope ◽  
Patricia F. Waller ◽  
Trivellore E. Raghunathan ◽  
Sujata M. Patil

Author(s):  
Yu-Fu Chen ◽  
Kung-Chun Hsueh ◽  
Yung-Cheng (Rex) Lai

Risk assessment is an important process for railway safety. Current practices for assessing the risks of driving behaviors aim to inspect the driving record generated by automatic train protection systems. This paper proposes an automatic process to access detailed data contained in driving data, and identifies six high-risk driving behaviors. The modules can assess the competency of drivers and evaluate the frequency of high-risk behaviors in each section. Moreover, an integrated risk index for driving behaviors is proposed to compare each driver and section. An empirical study for drivers and sections is performed to demonstrate the feasibility of applying the proposed modules in practice. Results reveal that 20% of high-risk drivers contribute to 74% of the total risk, while 15% of high-risk sections contribute to 80% of the total risk. The proposed modules identify the drivers and sections with high risk. By enabling the operators of railway systems to take countermeasures, this methodology could enable them to improve the safety of railway systems more efficiently.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 422
Author(s):  
Conrad L. Woolsey ◽  
Jeff M. Housman ◽  
Ronald D. Williams ◽  
Bert H. Jacobson ◽  
Thomas E. Sather ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document