scholarly journals Correlation of Kinematics and Kinetics of Changing Sagittal Plane Body Position during Landing and the Risk of Non-Contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 7773
Author(s):  
Mahgolzahra Kamari ◽  
Randeep Rakwal ◽  
Takuya Yoshida ◽  
Satoru Tanigawa ◽  
Seita Kuki
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Plane Body ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common knee injuries that negatively affect athletes’ future performance and return to play. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation of kinematics and kinetics of changing sagittal plane body position during landing and the risk of non-contact ACL injury. Seven university female (age 19.57 ± 0.79 y, height 164.21 ± 8.11 m, weight 60.43 ± 5.99 kg) athletes playing soccer and handball, and with ≥ two years of training volunteered for this research. Three trunk positions: Lean Forward Landing (LFL), Self-selected Landing (SSL), and Upright Landing (URL)—via double/single-leg landing—were captured by a high-speed VICON motion capture system. A 3 × 2 two-way within-subjects ANOVA and Multiple Bonferroni corrected pairwise were used to test for condition (LFL, SSL, URL) and task (single/double-leg) effects (p≤ 0.05). The findings indicated that landing with a deeper knee flexion angle (LFL) would lead to smaller impact forces when compared to upright landing.

Fifteen-Year Audit of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in the Australian Football League From 1999 to 2013: Return to Play and Subsequent ACL Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (14) ◽  
pp. 3353-3360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney C.H. Lai ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Kate E. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Australian Football League ◽  
Australian Football ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been a major cause of missed game time among Australian Football League (AFL) players. Return to play after ACL reconstruction is not always achieved, even among elite athletes. The rate of subsequent ACL injury in the AFL from 1990 to 2000 was high as compared with that of other elite sports. Purpose: To determine the rates of return to play and subsequent ACL injury after ACL reconstruction among AFL players from 1999 to 2013 and to explore factors associated with differing rates of return to play and subsequent ACL injury. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 158 AFL players who underwent ACL reconstruction were identified from a prospectively maintained registry of AFL player injuries. Further data were gathered from official playing statistics, surgical records, and structured phone interviews. Results: The rate of return to play after an initial ACL injury was 77% (121 of 158 players). Greater preinjury playing experience and earlier selection in the AFL draft were associated with higher rates of return to play. The rate of subsequent ACL injury to either knee was 30% (48 of 158 players) and was especially high among players aged <21 years (23 of 46 players, 50%). After subsequent ACL injury, 34 of 48 players (71%) returned to play. In primary ACL reconstruction, the use of Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System grafts resulted in a faster return to play ( P = .001) but had a higher risk of subsequent revision reconstruction (risk ratio = 2.8, P = .048). Family history of ACL injury was associated with an increased risk of subsequent contralateral ACL injury (risk ratio = 3.8, P = .002). Conclusion: Most AFL players who underwent ACL reconstruction returned to play at least 1 AFL match. The high rate of subsequent ACL injury among AFL players demonstrates the highly demanding nature of Australian football, particularly at the elite level. The risk factors for subsequent ACL injury should be considered carefully when treatment and rehabilitation decisions are made for these high-demand athletes.

Playing Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Australian Football League Players From 1999 to 2013

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1550-1556
Author(s):  
Courtney C.H. Lai ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Kate E. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Average Level ◽  
Australian Football League ◽  
Australian Football ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Achieving preinjury levels of athletic performance has been challenging for elite athletes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although a recent study found that 77% of Australian Football League (AFL) players who underwent ACL reconstruction from 1999 to 2013 returned to play at the highest level, the study did not indicate how consistently or well they were able to play. Purpose: To identify the number of AFL players who returned to play consistently over 2 seasons after ACL reconstruction, compare their playing performance in these seasons with preinjury performance, and evaluate factors associated with returning to preinjury levels of performance. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Analysis included 104 AFL players who underwent ACL reconstruction between 1999 and 2013. All had played at least 10 AFL matches in 1 season before ACL injury. Ranking points, as devised by AFL statisticians, were used to measure individual playing performance. Results: Of the 104 players who played at least 10 matches in 1 season before ACL injury, 53 (51%) returned to play at least 10 matches in 2 seasons after surgery. Of these 53 players, 36 (68%) returned to their preinjury levels of performance. The 17 remaining players who did not return to their preinjury performance still performed comparably to the AFL average level after surgery. Players <25 years old (odds ratio = 2.9, P = .01) or <90 kg (odds ratio = 2.7, P = .03) had greater odds of returning to their preinjury levels of performance. Conclusion: Returning to play on a consistent basis was a substantial challenge for AFL players after ACL reconstruction. However, among players who did return to play consistently over 2 seasons, their postsurgery average performance was comparable with the AFL average level of performance, and two-thirds returned to their preinjury levels of performance. Younger and lighter players were more likely to return to their preinjury levels of performance, possibly given the nature of AFL club playing list management decisions.

Factors Influencing Return to Play and Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Rates in Level 1 Athletes After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Follow-up on 1432 Reconstructions at a Single Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enda King ◽  
Chris Richter ◽  
Mark Jackson ◽  
Andy Franklyn-Miller ◽  
Eanna Falvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Injury Rates ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Despite the importance of return-to-play (RTP) rates, second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rates, and patient-reported outcomes of athletes returning to sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), these outcomes have not been evaluated together across a single cohort nor the pre- and intraoperative factors influencing outcomes explored. Purpose: To prospectively report outcomes after ACLR relating to RTP, second ACL injury, and International Knee Document Committee (IKDC) scores in a large cohort of athletes at a single center to examine the influence of pre- and intraoperative variables on these outcomes. Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A consecutive cohort of 1432 athletes undergoing primary ACLR by 2 orthopaedic surgeons was followed up prospectively more than 2 years after surgery. Pre- and intraoperative findings were reported with outcomes at follow-up relating to RTP, second ACL injury, and IKDC. Between-group differences for each outcome were reported and the predictive ability of pre- and intraoperative variables relating to each outcome assessed with logistic regression. Results: There was >95% follow-up 2 years after surgery. The RTP rate was 81%, and of those who returned, 1.3% of those with patellar tendon grafts and 8.3% of those with hamstring grafts experienced ipsilateral rerupture (hazard ratio, 0.17). The contralateral ACL injury rate was 6.6%, and the IKDC score at follow-up was 86.8, with a greater proportion of patients with patellar tendon grafts scoring <80 on the IKDC (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15-3.12). There was no relationship between time to RTP and second ACL injury, and there was a moderate correlation between ACL–Return to Sport After Injury score and RTP at follow-up ( P < .001, rho = 0.46). There were a number of differences in pre- and intraoperative variables between groups for each outcome, but they demonstrated a poor ability to predict outcomes in level 1 athletes at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Findings demonstrated high overall RTP rates, lower reinjury rates with patellar tendon graft after 2-year follow-up in level 1 athletes, and no influence of time to RTP on second ACL injury. Despite differences between groups, there was poor predictive ability of pre- and intraoperative variables. Results suggest pre- and intraoperative variables for consideration to optimize outcomes in level 1 athletes after ACLR, but future research exploring other factors, such as physical and psychological recovery, may be needed to improve outcome prediction after ACLR. Registration: NCT02771548 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency combined with lateral and/or medial meniscal injury results in abnormal kinematics and kinetics during level walking

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Xiaode Liu ◽  
Hongshi Huang ◽  
Wei Yin ◽  
Shuang Ren ◽  
Qiguo Rong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are commonly combined with meniscal tears. This study was performed to analyze the kinematics and kinetics of knees with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency with or without a combined medial or/and lateral meniscal injury during level walking. In all, 29 patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and 15 healthy male volunteers were recruited. Among these patients, 12 had isolated unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries (ACLD group), 5 had combined anterior cruciate ligament and lateral meniscal injuries (ACLDL group), 5 had combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial meniscal injuries (ACLDM group), and 7 had combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial/lateral meniscal injuries (ACLDML group). A subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model was utilized to estimate the tibiofemoral joint kinematic and kinetic behaviors based on the experimental data measured by using an optical tracking system. Regardless of the presence or absence of meniscal injury, the knees with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency exhibited significantly less extension than the control knees at the terminal stance (range of extension: ACLD, 4.84° ± 4.31°; ACLDL, 6.65° ± 5.73°; ACLDM, 5.21° ± 4.77°; ACLDML, 6.91° ± 4.30°; control, 12.35° ± 5.52°; P < 0.05). A lower extension moment and adduction moment in all anterior cruciate ligament deficiency affected knees were detected during the terminal stance when compared with control knees ( P < 0.05). The ACLDML group showed significantly lower proximal-distal compressive forces and anterior-posterior shear forces (approximately 0.5–1.5 body weight; P < 0.05) compared to the other 4 groups, while the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral shear forces tended to increase in the ACLD, ACLDL, and ACLDM groups at the mid to terminal stance. Significant lower adduction-abduction and internal-external moment peaks were observed in ACLDML groups, but not in the ACLD, ACLDL and ACLDM groups. These results indicate that the combination of an anterior cruciate ligament injury and meniscal injury could alter the kinematics and kinetics of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency affected knees depending on the presence and type of the meniscal tear.

Factors That Predict Sagittal Plane Knee Biomechanical Symmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Decision Tree Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110049
Author(s):  
Riann M. Palmieri-Smith ◽  
Michael T. Curran ◽  
Steven A. Garcia ◽  
Chandramouli Krishnan
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Knee Biomechanics ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Biomechanical knee asymmetry is commonly present after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Factors that could assist in identification of asymmetrical biomechanics after ACL reconstruction could help clinicians in making return-to-play decisions. The purpose of this study is to determine factors that may contribute to knee biomechanical asymmetry present after ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that quadriceps strength and activation and patient-reported function would allow for identification of patients with symmetrical knee biomechanics. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Thirty-one subjects (18 women; time since ACL reconstruction = 284.4 ± 53.6 days) who underwent ACL reconstruction and were to return to activity were recruited. Participants completed bilateral assessments of isokinetic quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation using the superimposed burst technique, and biomechanical function testing during a single-leg forward hop. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form was also completed. Symmetry values were calculated for each variable. Decision trees were utilized to determine which input factors (quadriceps strength symmetry, quadriceps activation symmetry, IKDC score, age, sex, height, mass, graft type) were able to identify participants who had symmetrical knee flexion angles (KFAs) and extension moments. Angles and moments were considered symmetrical if symmetry values were ≥90%. Results: Quadriceps strength and activation symmetry were able to predict whether a patient landed with symmetrical or asymmetrical KFAs, with thresholds of 77.2% strength symmetry and 91.3% activation symmetry being established. Patient-reported function and quadriceps strength were factors that allowed for classification of participants with symmetrical/asymmetrical knee extension moments, with thresholds of 89.1 for the IKDC and 80.0% for quadriceps strength symmetry. Conclusions: Quadriceps strength contributed to both models and appears to be a critical factor for achieving symmetrical knee biomechanics. High patient-reported function and quadriceps activation are also important for restoring knee biomechanical symmetry after ACL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Quadriceps strength and activation and patient-reported function may be able to assist clinicians in identifying ACL patients with symmetrical/asymmetrical knee biomechanics.

scholarly journals Psychological and Social Components of Recovery Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 9267
Author(s):  
Emil Vutescu ◽  
Sebastian Orman ◽  
Edgar Garcia-Lopez ◽  
Justin Lau ◽  
Andrew Gage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Acl Rupture ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Young Athletes ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury in young athletes. To restore knee stability and function, patients often undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Historically, there has been a focus in this population on the epidemiology of ACL injury, the technical aspects of ACL reconstruction, and post-operative functional outcomes. Although increasingly recognized as an important aspect in recovery, there remains limited literature examining the psychological aspects of post-operative rehabilitation and return to play following youth ACL reconstruction. Despite technical surgical successes and well-designed rehabilitation programs, many athletes never reach their preinjury athletic performance level and some may never return to their primary sport. This suggests that other factors may influence recovery, and indeed this has been documented in the adult literature. In addition to restoration of functional strength and stability, psychological and social factors play an important role in the recovery and overall outcome of ACL injuries in the pediatric population. Factors such as psychological readiness to return-to-play (RTP), motivation, mood disturbance, locus of control, recovery expectations, fear of reinjury, and self-esteem are correlated to the RTP potential of the young athlete. A better understanding of these concepts may help to maximize young patients’ outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to perform a narrative review of the current literature addressing psychosocial factors associated with recovery after ACL injury and subsequent reconstruction in young athletes. Our goal is to provide a resource for clinicians treating youth ACL injuries to help identify patients with maladaptive psychological responses after injury and encourage a multidisciplinary approach when treating young athletes with an ACL rupture.

KINETIC AND KINEMATIC PERFORMANCE OF THE UNAFFECTED LOWER LIMB DURING STEP DESCENT IN SUBJECTS WITH ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750021 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMMADREZA NEMATOLLAHI ◽  
MOHAMMAD TAGHI KARIMI ◽  
ALI RAFIEE ◽  
FRANCIS FATOYE
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics ◽  
Acl Deficient

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a significant role in the dynamics of the knee joint during locomotion. Previous investigations mainly verified kinematics and kinetics of patients with ACL deficiency drawn on the injured leg. Most studies analyzed these patients after reconstruction surgery. The aim of the present study was to scrutinize the kinematics and kinetics of the intact leg of the ACL deficient individuals during a single step descent. 15 ACL deficient individuals (ACLD) and 15 healthy subjects were recruited in this study. They were asked to descent a single step and continue to walk with preferred speed. Kinematics and kinetics of the hip, knee and ankle of both lower extremities were analyzed. Data was divided into step and walking phases. For the step phase, there were significant differences between the two groups in hip ([Formula: see text]), knee ([Formula: see text]) and ankle ([Formula: see text]) joints range of motion between groups. Velocity of the step descent phase was higher in ACLD subjects in comparison to normal group ([Formula: see text]). For the walking phase, knee joint range of motion in anteroposterior plane was lower in patients group ([Formula: see text]). The stride length in patients group was shorter than that of healthy subjects ([Formula: see text]). The sound side of the ACLD subjects demonstrated different patterns as compared to healthy control group. Both lower extremities may experience early degenerative changes. Therefore, it is recommended that both lower extremities should be assessed in ACLD patients.

Decreased Postural Control in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared to Healthy Controls

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 920-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon R. Staples ◽  
Kevin A. Schafer ◽  
Matthew V. Smith ◽  
John Motley ◽  
Mark Halstead ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Postural Stability ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Time To Failure ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Dynamic Postural Stability

Context: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are likely to have deficient dynamic postural stability compared with healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction have decreased dynamic postural stability compared with matched healthy controls. Design: Prospective case-control study. Setting: Orthopedic sports medicine and physical therapy clinics. Patients or Other Participants: Patients aged 20 years and younger with an ACL tear scheduled for reconstruction were enrolled prospectively. Controls were recruited from local high schools and colleges via flyers. Interventions: Patients underwent double-stance dynamic postural stability testing prior to surgery, recording time to failure and dynamic motion analysis (DMA) scores. Patients were then matched with healthy controls. Main Outcome Measures: Demographics, time to failure, and DMA scores were compared between groups. Results: A total of 19 females and 12 males with ACL tears were matched with controls. Individuals with ACL tears were more active (Marx activity score: 15.7 [1.0] vs 10.8 [4.9], P < .001); had shorter times until test failure (84.4 [15.8] vs 99.5 [14.5] s, P < .001); and had higher (worse) DMA scores (627 [147] vs 481 [132], P < .001), indicating less dynamic postural stability. Six patients with ACL deficiency (1 male and 5 females) demonstrated lower (better) DMA scores than their controls, and another 7 (4 males and 3 females) were within 20% of controls. Conclusions: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction had worse global dynamic postural stability compared with well-matched controls. This may represent the effect of the ACL injury or preexisting deficits that contributed to the injury itself. These differences should be studied further to evaluate their relevance to ACL injury risk, rehabilitation, and return to play.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document