scholarly journals The Influence of Hard- and Software Improvement of Intraoral Scanners on the Implant Transfer Accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 7166
Author(s):  
Alexander Schmidt ◽  
Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz ◽  
Haoyu Liu ◽  
Holger Sebastian Kämpe ◽  
Bernd Wöstmann
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Scan Paths ◽  
Master Model ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
True Definition ◽  
Conventional Impression ◽  
Transfer Accuracy

This study aimed to investigate the transfer accuracy (trueness and precision) of three different intraoral scanning families using different hardware and software versions over the last decade from 2012 to 2021, compared to a conventional impression. Therefore, an implant master model with a reference cube was digitized and served as a reference dataset. Digital impressions of all three scanning families (True definition, TRIOS, CEREC) were recorded (n = 10 per group), and conventional implant impressions were taken (n = 10). The conventional models were digitized, and all models (conventional and digital) were measured. Therefore, it was possible to obtain the deviations between the master model and the scans or conventional models in terms of absolute three-dimensional (3D) deviations, deviations in rotation, and angulation. The results for deviations between the older and newer scanning systems were analyzed using pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05; SPSS 26). The absolute 3D deviations increased with increasing scan path length, particularly for the older hardware and software versions (old vs. new (MW ± SD) True Definition: 355 ± 62 µm vs. 483 ± 110 µm; TRIOS: 574 ± 274 µm vs. 258 ± 100 µm; and CEREC: 1356 ± 1023 µm vs. 110 ± 49 µm). This was also true for deviations in rotation and angulation. The conventional impression showed an advantage only regarding the absolute 3D deviation compared to the older systems. Based on the data of the present study, the accuracy of intraoral scanners is decisively related to hardware and software; though, newer systems or software do not necessarily warrant improvement. Nevertheless, to achieve high transfer accuracy, regular updating of digital systems is recommended. The challenge of increasing errors with increasing scan paths is overcome in the most recent systems. The combination of two different scanning principles in a single device seems to be beneficial.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen S Yadav ◽  
Teerthesh Jain ◽  
Amrita Pandita ◽  
SMA Feroz ◽  
Pradeep LNU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laser Scanner ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Laser Scanners ◽  
Master Model

ABSTRACT Aim Aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate dimensional accuracy of newely introduced elastomeric impression material after repeated pours at different time intervals. Materials and methods In the present study a total of 20 (10 + 10) impressions of master model were made from vinyl polyether silicone and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Each impression was repeatedly poured at 1, 24 hours and 14 days. Therefore, a total of 60 casts were obtained. Casts obtained were scanned with three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner and measurements were done. Results Vinyl polyether silicone produced overall undersized dies, with greatest change being 0.14% only after 14 days. Vinyl polysiloxane produced smaller dies after 1 and 24 hours and larger dies after 14 days, differing from master model by only 0.07% for the smallest die and to 0.02% for the largest die. Conclusion All the deviations measured from the master model with both the impression materials were within a clinically acceptable range. Clinical significance In a typical fixed prosthodontic treatment accuracy of prosthesis is critical as it determines the success, failure and the prognosis of treatment including abutments. This is mainly dependent upon fit of prosthesis which in turn is dependent on dimensional accuracy of dies, poured from elastomeric impressions. How to cite this article Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SMA, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):265-268.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Schmidt ◽  
Leona Klussmann ◽  
Bernd Wöstmann ◽  
Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Reference Dataset ◽  
Coordinate Measurement ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Impression Technique ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
Scan Data ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Conventional Impression ◽  
Transfer Accuracy

The aim of this clinical study was to update the available data in the literature regarding the transfer accuracy (trueness/precision) of four current intraoral scanners (IOS) equipped with the latest software versions and to compare these data with conventional impressions (CVI). A metallic reference aid served as a reference dataset. Four digital impressions (Trios3Cart, Trios3Pod, Trios4Pod, and Primescan) and one CVI were investigated in five patients. Scan data were analyzed using three-dimensional analysis software and conventional models using a coordinate measurement machine. The transfer accuracy between the reference aid and the impression methods were compared. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Overall, mean ± standard deviation (SD) transfer accuracy ranged from 24.6 ± 17.7 µm (CVI) to 204.5 ± 182.1 µm (Trios3Pod). The Primescan yielded the lowest deviation for digital impressions (33.8 ± 31.5 µm), followed by Trios4Pod (65.2 ± 52.9 µm), Trios3Cart (84.7 ± 120.3 µm), and Trios3Pod. Within the limitations of this study, current IOS equipped with the latest software versions demonstrated less deviation for short-span distances compared with the conventional impression technique. However, for long-span distances, the conventional impression technique provided the lowest deviation. Overall, currently available IOS systems demonstrated improvement regarding transfer accuracy of full-arch scans in patients.

scholarly journals Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (13) ◽  
pp. 4725
Author(s):  
Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz ◽  
Victoria Schubert ◽  
Alexander Schmidt ◽  
Bernd Wöstmann ◽  
Sabine Ruf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Digital Impression ◽  
P Value ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
True Definition ◽  
Conventional Impression ◽  
Tooth Migration

Due to the high prevalence of periodontitis, dentists have to face a larger group of patients with periodontally compromised dentitions (PCDs) characterized by pathologic tooth migration and malocclusion. Impression taking in these patients is challenging due to several undercuts and extensive interdental areas (IAs). The aim of this clinical trial was to analyze the ability of analog and digital impression techniques to display the IAs in PCDs. The upper and the lower jaws of 30 patients (n = 60, age: 48–87 years) were investigated with one conventional impression (CVI) using polyvinyl siloxane and four digital impressions with intraoral scanners (IOSs), namely True Definition (TRU), Primescan (PRI), CS 3600 (CAR), and TRIOS 3 (TIO). The gypsum models of the CVIs were digitalized using a laboratory scanner. Subsequently, the percentage of the displayed IAs in relation to the absolute IAs was calculated for the five impression techniques in a three-dimensional measuring software. Significant differences were observed among the impression techniques (except between PRI and CAR, p-value < 0.05). TRU displayed the highest percentage of IAs, followed by PRI, CAR, TIO, and CVI. The results indicated that the IOSs are superior to CVI regarding the ability to display the IAs in PCDs.

scholarly journals A New Method to Evaluate Trueness and Precision of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques for Complete Dental Arch

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4612
Author(s):  
KweonSoo Seo ◽  
Sunjai Kim
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
New Method ◽  
Digital Impression ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Digital Models ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Master Model ◽  
Conventional Impression

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present a new method to analyze the three-dimensional accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions and verify the reliability of the method. Additionally, the accuracies of conventional and intraoral digital impressions were compared using the new method. Methods: A master model was fabricated using 14 milled polyetheretherketone cylinders and a maxillary acrylic model. Each cylinder was positioned and named according to its corresponding tooth position. Twenty-five definitive stone casts were fabricated using conventional impressions of the master model. An intraoral scanner was used to scan the master model 25 times to fabricate 25 digital models. A coordinate measuring machine was used to physically probe each cylinder in the master model and definitive casts. An inspection software was used to probe cylinders of digital models. A three-dimensional part coordinate system was defined and used to compute the centroid coordinate of each cylinder. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated to examine the reliability of the new method. Independent two sample t-test was performed to compare the trueness and precision of conventional and intraoral digital impressions (α = 0.05). Results: ICC results showed that, the new method had almost perfect reliability for the measurements of the master model, conventional and digital impression. Conventional impression showed more accurate absolute trueness and precision than intraoral digital impression for most of the tooth positions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The new method was reliable to analyze the three-dimensional deviation of complete-arch impressions. Conventional impression was still more accurate than digital intraoral impression for complete arches.

Three-dimensional stiffness in a thoracolumbar en-bloc spondylectomy model: A biomechanical in vitro study

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 957-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Disch ◽  
A. Luzzati ◽  
I. Melcher ◽  
K.D. Schaser ◽  
F. Feraboli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
En Bloc Spondylectomy ◽  
Bloc Spondylectomy

The Influence of Using Different Types of Scan Bodies on the Transfer Accuracy of Implant Position: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-260
Author(s):  
Alexander Schmidt ◽  
Jan-Wilhelm Billig ◽  
Maximiliane Schlenz ◽  
Bernd Wöstmann
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Implant Position ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Transfer Accuracy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document