scholarly journals Application of Machine Learning Methods to Neutron Transmission Spectroscopic Imaging for Solid–Liquid Phase Fraction Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 5988
Author(s):  
Takashi Kamiyama ◽  
Kazuma Hirano ◽  
Hirotaka Sato ◽  
Kanta Ono ◽  
Yuta Suzuki ◽  
...  

In neutron transmission spectroscopic imaging, the transmission spectrum of each pixel on a two-dimensional detector is analyzed and the real-space distribution of microscopic information in an object is visualized with a wide field of view by mapping the obtained parameters. In the analysis of the transmission spectrum, since the spectrum can be classified with certain characteristics, it is possible for machine learning methods to be applied. In this study, we selected the subject of solid–liquid phase fraction imaging as the simplest application of the machine learning method. Firstly, liquid and solid transmission spectra have characteristic shapes, so spectrum classification according to their fraction can be carried out. Unsupervised and supervised machine learning analysis methods were tested and evaluated with simulated datasets of solid–liquid spectrum combinations. Then, the established methods were used to perform an analysis with actual measured spectrum datasets. As a result, the solid–liquid interface zone was specified from the solid–liquid phase fraction imaging using machine learning analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Shoenbill ◽  
Yiqiang Song ◽  
Nichelle L. Cobb ◽  
Marc K. Drezner ◽  
Eneida A. Mendonca

ObjectiveClinical research involving humans is critically important, but it is a lengthy and expensive process. Most studies require institutional review board (IRB) approval. Our objective is to identify predictors of delays or accelerations in the IRB review process and apply this knowledge to inform process change in an effort to improve IRB efficiency, transparency, consistency and communication.MethodsWe analyzed timelines of protocol submissions to determine protocol or IRB characteristics associated with different processing times. Our evaluation included single variable analysis to identify significant predictors of IRB processing time and machine learning methods to predict processing times through the IRB review system. Based on initial identified predictors, changes to IRB workflow and staffing procedures were instituted and we repeated our analysis.ResultsOur analysis identified several predictors of delays in the IRB review process including type of IRB review to be conducted, whether a protocol falls under Veteran’s Administration purview and specific staff in charge of a protocol's review.ConclusionsWe have identified several predictors of delays in IRB protocol review processing times using statistical and machine learning methods. Application of this knowledge to process improvement efforts in two IRBs has led to increased efficiency in protocol review. The workflow and system enhancements that are being made support our four-part goal of improving IRB efficiency, consistency, transparency, and communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document