scholarly journals Comparison of Two Approaches to GNSS Positioning Using Code Pseudoranges Generated by Smartphone Device

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4787
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Pepe ◽  
Domenica Costantino ◽  
Gabriele Vozza ◽  
Vincenzo Saverio Alfio
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Devices ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Gis Applications ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The release of Android 7.0 has made raw GNSS positioning data available on smartphones and, as a result, this has allowed many experiments to be developed to evaluate the quality of GNSS positioning using mobile devices. This paper investigates the best positioning, using pseudorange measurement in the Differential Global Navigation Satellite System (DGNSS) and Single Point Positioning (SPP), obtained by smartphones. The experimental results show that SPP can be comparable to the DGNSS solution and can generally achieve an accuracy of one meter in planimetric positioning; in some conditions, an accuracy of less than one meter was achieved in the Easting coordinate. As far as altimetric positioning is concerned, it has been demonstrated that DGNSS is largely preferable to SPP. The aim of the research is to introduce a statistical method to evaluate the accuracy and precision of smartphone positioning that can be applied to any device since it is based only on the pseudoranges of the code. In order to improve the accuracy of positioning from mobile devices, two methods (Tukey and K-means) were used and applied, as they can detect and eliminate outliers in the data. Finally, the paper shows a case study on how the implementation of SPP on GIS applications for smartphones could improve citizen science experiments.

scholarly journals Optimal Fault Detection and Exclusion Applied in GNSS Positioning

2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yang ◽  
Nathan L. Knight ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Chris Rizos
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Practical Strategy ◽  
Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Made In

In Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning, it is standard practice to apply the Fault Detection and Exclusion (FDE) procedure iteratively, in order to exclude all faulty measurements and then ensure reliable positioning results. Since it is often only necessary to consider a single fault in a Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) procedure, it would be ideal if a fault could be correctly identified. Thus, fault detection does not need to be applied in an iterative sense. One way of evaluating whether fault detection needs to be reapplied is to determine the probability of a wrong exclusion. To date, however, limited progress has been made in evaluating such probabilities. In this paper the relationships between different parameters are analysed in terms of the probability of correct and incorrect identification. Using this knowledge, a practical strategy for incorporating the probability of a wrong exclusion into the FDE procedure is developed. The theoretical findings are then demonstrated using a GPS single point positioning example.

Lower Bounds on DOP

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Swaszek ◽  
Richard J. Hartnett ◽  
Kelly C. Seals
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Constellations ◽  
Dilution Of Precision ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Satellite Selection ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Code phase Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning performance is often described by the Geometric or Position Dilution of Precision (GDOP or PDOP), functions of the number of satellites employed in the solution and their geometry. This paper develops lower bounds to both metrics solely as functions of the number of satellites, effectively removing the added complexity caused by their locations in the sky, to allow users to assess how well their receivers are performing with respect to the best possible performance. Such bounds will be useful as receivers sub-select from the plethora of satellites available with multiple GNSS constellations. The bounds are initially developed for one constellation assuming that the satellites are at or above the horizon. Satellite constellations that essentially achieve the bounds are discussed, again with value toward the problem of satellite selection. The bounds are then extended to a non-zero mask angle and to multiple constellations.

scholarly journals Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception)

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
A. Farah
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception) Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have an endless number of applications in industry, science, military, transportation and recreation & sports. Two systems are currently in operation namely GPS (the USA Global Positioning System) and GLONASS (the Russian GLObal NAvigation Satellite System), and a third is planned, the European satellite navigation system GALILEO. The potential performance improvements achievable through combining these systems could be significant and expectations are high. The need is inevitable to explore the future of positioning from different nominal constellations. In this research paper, Bernese 5.0 software could be modified to simulate and process GNSS observations from three different constellations (GPS, Glonass and Galileo) using different combinations. This study presents results of code single point positioning for five stations using the three constellations and different combinations.

Aircraft positioning using GPS/GLONASS code observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Krasuski ◽  
Janusz Cwiklak ◽  
Marek Grzegorzewski
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Protection Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Purpose This paper aims to present the problem of the integration of the global positioning system (GPS)/global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) data for the processing of aircraft position determination. Design/methodology/approach The aircraft coordinates were obtained based on GPS and GLONASS code observations for the single point positioning (SPP) method. The numerical computations were executed in the aircraft positioning software (APS) package. The mathematical scheme of equation observation of the SPP method was solved using least square estimation in stochastic processing. In the research experiment, the raw global navigation satellite system data from the Topcon HiperPro onboard receiver were applied. Findings In the paper, the mean errors of an aircraft position from APS were under 3 m. In addition, the accuracy of aircraft positioning was better than 6 m. The integrity term for horizontal protection level and vertical protection level parameters in the flight test was below 16 m. Research limitations/implications The paper presents only the application of GPS/GLONASS observations in aviation, without satellite data from other navigation systems. Practical implications The presented research method can be used in an aircraft based augmentation system in Polish aviation. Social implications The paper is addressed to persons who work in aviation and air transport. Originality/value The paper presents the SPP method as a satellite technique for the recovery of an aircraft position in an aviation test.

scholarly journals GNSS Practice in Survey Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Sushmita Timilisina ◽  
Bibek Nepal
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Geodetic Survey ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Control Points ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Control Networks for Nepal was originally defined through the use of conventional measurements. Conventional mapping methods have led to a static and inactive networks of control point. This network of control served us very well until the devastating earthquake hit Nepal and disturbed it. Determination of precise ground locations is essential for various tasks such as engineering works, earth observation, location-based technologies, emergency service providers, etc. Global Navigation Satellite System plays a very important role in providing quick and reliable positioning/navigation data. The term ‘global navigation satellite system’ (GNSS) refers to a constellation of satellites providing signals from space transmitting positioning and timing data. These systems use the principle of trilateration to calculate the location of a user, through the information obtained from a number of satellites. Each satellite transmits coded signals at precise intervals. In principle, three satellites must be available to determine a three-dimensional (x,y,z) position , additional fourth signal is necessary for precise location of a single point. This helps in eliminating the time differences between satellite’s atomic clocks and the receiver's clocks. USA in around 1970’s started the use of Global Positioning System(GPS). Geodetic Survey Division under Survey Department commenced the use of GPS technology in 1991 A.D as a method for survey technology. Survey Department initiated the use of GPS for carrying out survey of the previously established high order control points. Transformation Parameters (TP) between the National Co-ordinate System and WGS-84 System was derived using the initial Control points co-ordinate and co-ordinate of the same Control points obtained from GNSS survey. GNSS has been used for establishing, updating and rehabilitation of Control Network, measure shift in location produced by earthquake and for various survey task carried out by Survey Department.

Performance Evaluation of the CNAV Broadcast Ephemeris

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1331-1344
Author(s):  
Ahao Wang ◽  
Junping Chen ◽  
Yize Zhang ◽  
Jiexian Wang ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Navigation Message ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The new Global Positioning System (GPS) Civil Navigation Message (CNAV) has been transmitted by Block IIR-M and Block IIF satellites since April 2014, both on the L2C and L5 signals. Compared to the Legacy Navigation Message (LNAV), the CNAV message provides six additional parameters (two orbit parameters and four Inter-Signal Correction (ISC) parameters) for prospective civil users. Using the precise products of the International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS), we evaluate the precision of satellite orbit, clock and ISCs of the CNAV. Additionally, the contribution of the six new parameters to GPS Single Point Positioning (SPP) is analysed using data from 22 selected Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System Experiment (MGEX) stations from a 30-day period. The results indicate that the CNAV/LNAV Signal-In-Space Range Error (SISRE) and orbit-only SISRE from January 2016 to March 2018 is of 0·5 m and 0·3 m respectively, which is improved in comparison with the results from an earlier period. The ISC precision of L1 Coarse/Acquisition (C/A) is better than 0·1 ns, and those of L2C and L5Q5 are about 0·4 ns. Remarkably, ISC correction has little effect on the single-frequency SPP for GPS users using civil signals (for example, L1C, L2C), whereas dual-frequency SPP with the consideration of ISCs results have an accuracy improvement of 18·6%, which is comparable with positioning accuracy based on an ionosphere-free combination of the L1P (Y) and L2P (Y) signals.

scholarly journals Assessment of Dual Frequency GNSS Observations from a Xiaomi Mi 8 Android Smartphone and Positioning Performance Analysis

Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Robustelli ◽  
Valerio Baiocchi ◽  
Giovanni Pugliano
Keyword(s):  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

On May 2018 the world’s first dual-frequency Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) smartphone produced by Xiaomi equipped with a Broadcom BCM47755 chip was launched. It is able to receive L1/E1/ and L5/E5 signals from GPS, Galileo, Beidou, and GLONASS (GLObal NAvigation Satellite System) satellites. The main aim of this work is to achieve the phone’s position by using multi-constellation, dual frequency pseudorange and carrier phase raw data collected from the smartphone. Furthermore, the availability of dual frequency raw data allows to assess the multipath performance of the device. The smartphone’s performance is compared with that of a geodetic receiver. The experiments were conducted in two different scenarios to test the smartphone under different multipath conditions. Smartphone measurements showed a lower C/N0 and higher multipath compared with those of the geodetic receiver. This produced negative effects on single-point positioning as showed by high root mean square error (RMS). The best positioning accuracy for single point was obtained with the E5 measurements with a DRMS (horizontal root mean square error) of 4.57 m. For E1/L1 frequency, the 2DRMS was 5.36 m. However, the Xiaomi Mi 8, thanks to the absence of the duty cycle, provided carrier phase measurements used for a static single frequency relative positioning with an achieved 2DRMS of 1.02 and 1.95 m in low and high multipath sites, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document