scholarly journals Galactography Combined with Sonogalactography for Improving the Evaluation of Pathological Nipple Discharge

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Juan de Dios Berná-Serna ◽  
Florentina Guzmán-Aroca ◽  
César Leal-Costa ◽  
Miguel Alcaraz ◽  
Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
Diagnosis Algorithm ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Diagnosing patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) is controversial, and therefore a standardized diagnosis algorithm is needed. The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of galactography (GL) combined with sonogalactography (SGL) for the evaluation of PND patients. A retrospective study was conducted of 51 patients with PND who were evaluated with GL and SGL. The findings from the galactograms of the patients in this study were assigned to different categories of the Galactogram Image Classification System. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, and the positive predictive values and negative predictive values of the GL and SGL tests were calculated, considering the gold standard of pathology diagnosis. The results obtained show that GL combined with SGL improved the diagnostic efficiency of ductal lesions, especially for borderline and malignant lesions. Papilloma was diagnosed in 19 cases, and ductal carcinoma in situ in 8 patients. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the combination of GL and SGL improves the diagnostic efficiency of ductal lesions of patients with PND. A diagnosis algorithm is recommended for women with PND.

scholarly journals Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (05) ◽  
pp. 493-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland ◽  
Caroline Preuss ◽  
Peter Fasching ◽  
Christian Loehberg ◽  
Michael Lux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Imaging Technique ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
First Time

Abstract Introduction For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings. Material and Methods Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings. Results All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Conclusion This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings.

scholarly journals TP8.1.12 Diagnostic Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Potential Malignancy in Patients Presented with Nipple Discharge

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nixon Phua Cher Yang ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Javed Butt ◽  
Parmvir Singh Nijjar ◽  
Saung Phyu ◽  
Musa Barkeji
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Imaging Tool ◽  
Additional Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Aims Nipple discharge is a presentation commonly seen at breast clinics. It is conventionally evaluated with physical examination and sonography( or mammography). The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an additional imaging tool in the evaluation of potential malignancy in patients presented with nipple discharge. Methods A retrospective evaluation of 85 patients with nipple discharge who underwent breast ultrasound (USS) and MRI between 04/06/2008 and 25/10/2019 was conducted. Clinical notes, radiographic reports and biopsy results were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USS and MRI were calculated. Results Out of the 85 patients (all female; mean age 45.33 +/- 12.93 years old) with nipple discharge, 11 were found to have biopsy-proven malignancy (invasive ductal carcinoma/ ductal carcinoma in situ; 12.94% risk). USS failed to identify seven malignancies (27.27% sensitivity) while MRI missed three malignancies (72.72% sensitivity). USS falsely identified four malignancies from 74 patients with no malignancy (94.59% specificity) while MRI only falsely identified one case (98.65% specificity). For patients with negative USS results (U1/U2/U3) or negative MRI results (BI-RADS category 1,2 or 3), the negative predictive values of USS is 89.74% while that of MRI is 96.05%. The positive predictive values of USS and MRI are 42.86% and 88.88% respectively. Conclusion Compared to USS, MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and predictive value. It will be a valuable addition to the standard nipple discharge evaluation workup to help rule out malignancy.

scholarly journals Case Report: Ductal CarcinomaIn Situin the Male Breast

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Joshua Chern ◽  
Lydia Liao ◽  
Raymond Baraldi ◽  
Elizabeth Tinney ◽  
Karen Hendershott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Grade 3

High-grade ductal carcinoma in situ is incredibly rare in male patients. The prognosis for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a male patient is the same as it would be for a female with the same stage disease; therefore, early recognition and diagnosis are of the utmost importance. We present a case of a male with unilateral invasive ductal carcinoma who was diagnosed with DCIS in the contralateral breast. The DCIS presented as microcalcifications on mammography and was found to be biopsy proven grade 3 papillary DCIS. This case also illustrates the importance of family history and risk factors, all of which need to be evaluated in any male presenting with a breast mass or nipple discharge.

scholarly journals Ductal Carcinoma In situ of the Male Breast

Breast Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Brents ◽  
John Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
High Grade

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast is an unusual lesion and most often associated with invasive carcinoma. On rare occasions when the in situ component is present in pure form, histological grade is almost always low to intermediate. Imaging for these patients is difficult as gynecomastia is often present and can mask underlying calcifications or carcinoma. Case Report: We report a case of pure high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast in a patient with clear nipple discharge. Breast mammography showed bilateral gynecomastia and benign calcifications. Subsequent breast ultrasound showed dilated ducts of the left breast, and a left breast ductogram showed filling defects suggestive of a papilloma. Excisional biopsy and subsequent mastectomy were consistent with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusion: Male breast cancer is uncommon and, although there is increasing awareness, it is less studied compared to female breast cancer. With a clinical history of nipple discharge of any kind, further evaluation with imaging should be considered. In males with gynecomastia, it is important to remember that ductal carcinoma in situ, even of high grade, is difficult to detect on mammography and may not be associated with suspicious calcifications.

scholarly journals DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BREAST: A CASE REPORT WITH AN ATYPICAL CLINICAL PRESENTATION

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Campodonio ◽  
Ana Mayra Oliveira ◽  
Flávio A Machado
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Mammographic Screening ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Palpable Mass ◽  
Bloody Nipple Discharge ◽  
The Right

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a proliferative lesion, precursor of cancer, which has been increasingly diagnosed due to mammographic screening. Tumor size itself does not determine whether the lesion is in situ or invasive, so it is essential to emphasize that DCIS can present with variable extension. We report a case of a 44-year-old female patient that was diagnosed a great (12 cm) DCIS of the breast without microinvasion through pathologic examination. The patient presented with an increase of the right breast, acyclic mastalgia and right bloody nipple discharge. Mammography was inconclusive, the ultrasound suggested inflammation and the incisional biopsy revealed DCIS nuclear grade 3 with compromised lateral margins. It was performed simple mastectomy and axillary node sampling. The clinical presentations of benign and malignant diseases of the breast are variable. The most common symptoms reported by women are pain, palpable mass or nipple discharge. The literature reveals that the extent of this type of cancer is variable, being found in a review intraductal lesions up to 5.4 cm, size smaller than that one that was found in this patient. This finding makes the clinical apresentation interesting to be discussed. Although mammography is the most efficient method to diagnose this injury, clinical breast exam should be performed in all gynecological independent of patient age because it is useful for diagnosing early lesion, considering that it is a palpable lesion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document