scholarly journals Supervised Machine Learning to Assess Methane Emissions of a Dairy Building with Natural Ventilation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 6938
Author(s):  
Sabrina Hempel ◽  
Julian Adolphs ◽  
Niels Landwehr ◽  
Dilya Willink ◽  
David Janke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Methane Emission ◽  
Natural Ventilation ◽  
Methane Emissions ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Multilinear Regression ◽  
Quartile Range

A reliable quantification of greenhouse gas emissions is a basis for the development of adequate mitigation measures. Protocols for emission measurements and data analysis approaches to extrapolate to accurate annual emission values are a substantial prerequisite in this context. We systematically analyzed the benefit of supervised machine learning methods to project methane emissions from a naturally ventilated cattle building with a concrete solid floor and manure scraper located in Northern Germany. We took into account approximately 40 weeks of hourly emission measurements and compared model predictions using eight regression approaches, 27 different sampling scenarios and four measures of model accuracy. Data normalization was applied based on median and quartile range. A correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of individual features. This indicated only a very weak linear relation between the methane emission and features that are typically used to predict methane emission values of naturally ventilated barns. It further highlighted the added value of including day-time and squared ambient temperature as features. The error of the predicted emission values was in general below 10%. The results from Gaussian processes, ordinary multilinear regression and neural networks were least robust. More robust results were obtained with multilinear regression with regularization, support vector machines and particularly the ensemble methods gradient boosting and random forest. The latter had the added value to be rather insensitive against the normalization procedure. In the case of multilinear regression, also the removal of not significantly linearly related variables (i.e., keeping only the day-time component) led to robust modeling results. We concluded that measurement protocols with 7 days and six measurement periods can be considered sufficient to model methane emissions from the dairy barn with solid floor with manure scraper, particularly when periods are distributed over the year with a preference for transition periods. Features should be normalized according to median and quartile range and must be carefully selected depending on the modeling approach.

scholarly journals Supervised machine learning based liver disease prediction approach with LASSO feature selection

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 3369-3376
Author(s):  
Saima Afrin ◽  
F. M. Javed Mehedi Shamrat ◽  
Tafsirul Islam Nibir ◽  
Mst. Fahmida Muntasim ◽  
Md. Shakil Moharram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Prediction Approach

In this contemporary era, the uses of machine learning techniques are increasing rapidly in the field of medical science for detecting various diseases such as liver disease (LD). Around the globe, a large number of people die because of this deadly disease. By diagnosing the disease in a primary stage, early treatment can be helpful to cure the patient. In this research paper, a method is proposed to diagnose the LD using supervised machine learning classification algorithms, namely logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, AdaBoost, KNN, linear discriminant analysis, gradient boosting and support vector machine (SVM). We also deployed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection technique on our taken dataset to suggest the most highly correlated attributes of LD. The predictions with 10 fold cross-validation (CV) made by the algorithms are tested in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, precision and f1-score values to forecast the disease. It is observed that the decision tree algorithm has the best performance score where accuracy, precision, sensitivity and f1-score values are 94.295%, 92%, 99% and 96% respectively with the inclusion of LASSO. Furthermore, a comparison with recent studies is shown to prove the significance of the proposed system. 

scholarly journals Classification of Agriculture Farm Machinery Using Machine Learning and Internet of Things

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 403
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waleed ◽  
Tai-Won Um ◽  
Tariq Kamal ◽  
Syed Muhammad Usman
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Farm Machinery ◽  
Learning Techniques

In this paper, we apply the multi-class supervised machine learning techniques for classifying the agriculture farm machinery. The classification of farm machinery is important when performing the automatic authentication of field activity in a remote setup. In the absence of a sound machine recognition system, there is every possibility of a fraudulent activity taking place. To address this need, we classify the machinery using five machine learning techniques—K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB). For training of the model, we use the vibration and tilt of machinery. The vibration and tilt of machinery are recorded using the accelerometer and gyroscope sensors, respectively. The machinery included the leveler, rotavator and cultivator. The preliminary analysis on the collected data revealed that the farm machinery (when in operation) showed big variations in vibration and tilt, but observed similar means. Additionally, the accuracies of vibration-based and tilt-based classifications of farm machinery show good accuracy when used alone (with vibration showing slightly better numbers than the tilt). However, the accuracies improve further when both (the tilt and vibration) are used together. Furthermore, all five machine learning algorithms used for classification have an accuracy of more than 82%, but random forest was the best performing. The gradient boosting and random forest show slight over-fitting (about 9%), but both algorithms produce high testing accuracy. In terms of execution time, the decision tree takes the least time to train, while the gradient boosting takes the most time.

scholarly journals An explainable supervised machine learning predictor of acute kidney injury after adult deceased donor liver transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihan Zhang ◽  
Dong Yang ◽  
Zifeng Liu ◽  
Chaojin Chen ◽  
Mian Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Adaptive Boosting ◽  
Validation Set

Abstract Background Early prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT) facilitates timely recognition and intervention. We aimed to build a risk predictor of post-LT AKI via supervised machine learning and visualize the mechanism driving within to assist clinical decision-making. Methods Data of 894 cases that underwent liver transplantation from January 2015 to September 2019 were collected, covering demographics, donor characteristics, etiology, peri-operative laboratory results, co-morbidities and medications. The primary outcome was new-onset AKI after LT according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Predicting performance of five classifiers including logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM) and adaptive boosting were respectively evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity and specificity. Model with the best performance was validated in an independent dataset involving 195 adult LT cases from October 2019 to March 2021. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to evaluate feature importance and explain the predictions made by ML algorithms. Results 430 AKI cases (55.1%) were diagnosed out of 780 included cases. The GBM model achieved the highest AUC (0.76, CI 0.70 to 0.82), F1-score (0.73, CI 0.66 to 0.79) and sensitivity (0.74, CI 0.66 to 0.8) in the internal validation set, and a comparable AUC (0.75, CI 0.67 to 0.81) in the external validation set. High preoperative indirect bilirubin, low intraoperative urine output, long anesthesia time, low preoperative platelets, and graft steatosis graded NASH CRN 1 and above were revealed by SHAP method the top 5 important variables contributing to the diagnosis of post-LT AKI made by GBM model. Conclusions Our GBM-based predictor of post-LT AKI provides a highly interoperable tool across institutions to assist decision-making after LT. Graphic abstract

scholarly journals An explainable supervised machine learning predictor of acute kidney injury after adult deceased donor liver transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihan Zhang ◽  
Dong Yang ◽  
Zifeng Liu ◽  
Chaojin Chen ◽  
Mian Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Adaptive Boosting

Abstract Background: Early prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation (LT) facilitates timely recognition and intervention. We aimed to build a risk predictor of post-LT AKI via supervised machine learning and visualize the mechanism driving within to assist clinical decision-making.Methods: Data of 894 cases that underwent liver transplantation from January 2015 to September 2019 were collected, covering demographics, donor characteristics, etiology, peri-operative laboratory results, co-morbidities and medications. The primary outcome was new-onset AKI after LT according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Predicting performance of five classifiers including logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM) and adaptive boosting were respectively evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity and specificity. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to evaluate feature importance and explain the predictions made by ML algorithms.Results: 430 AKI cases (55.1%) were diagnosed out of 780 included cases. The GBM model achieved the highest AUC (0.76, CI 0.70 to 0.82), F1-score (0.73, CI 0.66to 0.79) and sensitivity (0.74, CI 0.66 to 0.8). High preoperative indirect bilirubin, low intraoperative urine output, long anesthesia time, low preoperative platelets, and graft steatosis graded NASH CRN 1 and above were revealed by SHAP method the top 5 important variables contributing to the diagnosis of post-LT AKI made by GBM model.Conclusions: Our GBM-based predictor of post-LT AKI provides a highly interoperable tool across institutions to assist decision-making after LT.

scholarly journals Use of Supervised Machine Learning for GNSS Signal Spoofing Detection with Validation on Real-World Meaconing and Spoofing Data—Part II

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1806
Author(s):  
Silvio Semanjski ◽  
Ivana Semanjski ◽  
Wim De Wilde ◽  
Sidharta Gautama
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Real World ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Correlation Pattern ◽  
The Real

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) meaconing and spoofing are being considered as the key threats to the Safety-of-Life (SoL) applications that mostly rely upon the use of open service (OS) signals without signal or data-level protection. While a number of pre and post correlation techniques have been proposed so far, possible utilization of the supervised machine learning algorithms to detect GNSS meaconing and spoofing is currently being examined. One of the supervised machine learning algorithms, the Support Vector Machine classification (C-SVM), is proposed for utilization at the GNSS receiver level due to fact that at that stage of signal processing, a number of measurements and observables exists. It is possible to establish the correlation pattern among those GNSS measurements and observables and monitor it with use of the C-SVM classification, the results of which we present in this paper. By adding the real-world spoofing and meaconing datasets to the laboratory-generated spoofing datasets at the training stage of the C-SVM, we complement the experiments and results obtained in Part I of this paper, where the training was conducted solely with the use of laboratory-generated spoofing datasets. In two experiments presented in this paper, the C-SVM algorithm was cross-fed with the real-world meaconing and spoofing datasets, such that the meaconing addition to the training was validated by the spoofing dataset, and vice versa. The comparative analysis of all four experiments presented in this paper shows promising results in two aspects: (i) the added value of the training dataset enrichment seems to be relevant for real-world GNSS signal manipulation attempt detection and (ii) the C-SVM-based approach seems to be promising for GNSS signal manipulation attempt detection, as well as in the context of potential federated learning applications.

scholarly journals Machine Learning Models for COVID-19 Detection in Brazil Based on Symptoms (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Íris Viana dos Santos Santana ◽  
Andressa C. M. da Silveira ◽  
Álvaro Sobrinho ◽  
Lenardo Chaves e Silva ◽  
Leandro Dias da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Accuracy Score ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Runny Nose ◽  
Extreme Gradient Boosting

BACKGROUND controlling the COVID-19 outbreak in Brazil is considered a challenge of continental proportions due to the high population and urban density, weak implementation and maintenance of social distancing strategies, and limited testing capabilities. OBJECTIVE to contribute to addressing such a challenge, we present the implementation and evaluation of supervised Machine Learning (ML) models to assist the COVID-19 detection in Brazil based on early-stage symptoms. METHODS firstly, we conducted data preprocessing and applied the Chi-squared test in a Brazilian dataset, mainly composed of early-stage symptoms, to perform statistical analyses. Afterward, we implemented ML models using the Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. We evaluated the ML models using precision, accuracy score, recall, the area under the curve, and the Friedman and Nemenyi tests. Based on the comparison, we grouped the top five ML models and measured feature importance. RESULTS the MLP model presented the highest mean accuracy score, with more than 97.85%, when compared to GBM (> 97.39%), RF (> 97.36%), DT (> 97.07%), XGBoost (> 97.06%), KNN (> 95.14%), and SVM (> 94.27%). Based on the statistical comparison, we grouped MLP, GBM, DT, RF, and XGBoost, as the top five ML models, because the evaluation results are statistically indistinguishable. The ML models` importance of features used during predictions varies from gender, profession, fever, sore throat, dyspnea, olfactory disorder, cough, runny nose, taste disorder, and headache. CONCLUSIONS supervised ML models effectively assist the decision making in medical diagnosis and public administration (e.g., testing strategies), based on early-stage symptoms that do not require advanced and expensive exams.

scholarly journals Classification of Lidar Measurements Using Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazal Farhani ◽  
Robert J. Sica ◽  
Mark Joseph Daley
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Lidar Measurements

Abstract. While it is relatively straightforward to automate the processing of lidar signals, it is more difficult to choose periods of "good" measurements to process. Groups use various ad hoc procedures involving either very simple (e.g. signal-to-noise ratio) or more complex procedures (e.g. Wing et al., 2018) to perform a task which is easy to train humans to perform but is time consuming. Here, we use machine learning techniques to train the machine to sort the measurements before processing. The presented methods is generic and can be applied to most lidars. We test the techniques using measurements from the Purple Crow Lidar (PCL) system located in London, Canada. The PCL has over 200,000 raw scans in Rayleigh and Raman channels available for classification. We classify raw (level-0) lidar measurements as "clear" sky scans with strong lidar returns, "bad" scans, and scans which are significantly influenced by clouds or aerosol loads. We examined different supervised machine learning algorithms including the random forest, the support vector machine, and the gradient boosting trees, all of which can successfully classify scans. The algorithms where trained using about 1500 scans for each PCL channel, selected randomly from different nights of measurements in different years. The success rate of identification, for all the channels is above 95 %. We also used the t-distributed Stochastic Embedding (t-SNE) method, which is an unsupervised algorithm, to cluster our lidar scans. Because the t-SNE is a data driven method in which no labelling of training set is needed, it is an attractive algorithm to find anomalies in lidar scans. The method has been tested on several nights of measurements from the PCL measurements.The t-SNE can successfully cluster the PCL data scans into meaningful categories. To demonstrate the use of the technique, we have used the algorithm to identify stratospheric aerosol layers due to wildfires.

scholarly journals A Machine Learning Practice on NAS Dataset: Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Student Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 3272-3275
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Nearest Neighbours ◽  
Proactive Measures ◽  
New Student

India’s population is enormous and diverse due to which its education system is very complex. Furthermore, due to several reasons that they have grown up in different environmental situations. Over the years, several changes have been suggested and implemented by various stakeholders to improve the quality of education in schools. This paper presents a novel method to predict the performance of a new student by the analysis of historical student data records, and furthermore, we explore the NAS dataset using cutting edge Machine Learning Algorithms to predict the grades of a new student and take proactive measures to help them succeed. Similarly, NAS Dataset can also be worthwhile to the employee dataset and can predict the performance of the employee. Some of the Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification which have been successfully applied to the NAS dataset. Support Vector Machines and K-Nearest Neighbours algorithms did not crop results in coherent time for the given dataset; Gradient Boosting Classifier outperformed than all other algorithms reliably

scholarly journals How the Selection of Training Data and Modeling Approach Affects the Estimation of Ammonia Emissions from a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Barn—Classical Statistics versus Machine Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Hempel ◽  
Julian Adolphs ◽  
Niels Landwehr ◽  
David Janke ◽  
Thomas Amon
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Multilinear Regression ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Classical Statistics ◽  
Reliable Quantification

Environmental protection efforts can only be effective in the long term with a reliable quantification of pollutant gas emissions as a first step to mitigation. Measurement and analysis strategies must permit the accurate extrapolation of emission values. We systematically analyzed the added value of applying modern machine learning methods in the process of monitoring emissions from naturally ventilated livestock buildings to the atmosphere. We considered almost 40 weeks of hourly emission values from a naturally ventilated dairy cattle barn in Northern Germany. We compared model predictions using 27 different scenarios of temporal sampling, multiple measures of model accuracy, and eight different regression approaches. The error of the predicted emission values with the tested measurement protocols was, on average, well below 20%. The sensitivity of the prediction to the selected training dataset was worse for the ordinary multilinear regression. Gradient boosting and random forests provided the most accurate and robust emission value predictions, accompanied by the second-smallest model errors. Most of the highly ranked scenarios involved six measurement periods, while the scenario with the best overall performance was: One measurement period in summer and three in the transition periods, each lasting for 14 days.

scholarly journals Classification of lidar measurements using supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 391-402
Author(s):  
Ghazal Farhani ◽  
Robert J. Sica ◽  
Mark Joseph Daley
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Lidar Measurements

Abstract. While it is relatively straightforward to automate the processing of lidar signals, it is more difficult to choose periods of “good” measurements to process. Groups use various ad hoc procedures involving either very simple (e.g. signal-to-noise ratio) or more complex procedures (e.g. Wing et al., 2018) to perform a task that is easy to train humans to perform but is time-consuming. Here, we use machine learning techniques to train the machine to sort the measurements before processing. The presented method is generic and can be applied to most lidars. We test the techniques using measurements from the Purple Crow Lidar (PCL) system located in London, Canada. The PCL has over 200 000 raw profiles in Rayleigh and Raman channels available for classification. We classify raw (level-0) lidar measurements as “clear” sky profiles with strong lidar returns, “bad” profiles, and profiles which are significantly influenced by clouds or aerosol loads. We examined different supervised machine learning algorithms including the random forest, the support vector machine, and the gradient boosting trees, all of which can successfully classify profiles. The algorithms were trained using about 1500 profiles for each PCL channel, selected randomly from different nights of measurements in different years. The success rate of identification for all the channels is above 95 %. We also used the t-distributed stochastic embedding (t-SNE) method, which is an unsupervised algorithm, to cluster our lidar profiles. Because the t-SNE is a data-driven method in which no labelling of the training set is needed, it is an attractive algorithm to find anomalies in lidar profiles. The method has been tested on several nights of measurements from the PCL measurements. The t-SNE can successfully cluster the PCL data profiles into meaningful categories. To demonstrate the use of the technique, we have used the algorithm to identify stratospheric aerosol layers due to wildfires.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document