scholarly journals Cone Beam CT Imaging of the Paranasal Region with a Multipurpose X-ray System—Image Quality and Radiation Exposure

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5876
Author(s):  
Sabine Ohlmeyer ◽  
Marc Saake ◽  
Thomas Buder ◽  
Matthias May ◽  
Michael Uder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Surgery Planning ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Dose Levels

Besides X-ray and fluoroscopy, a previously introduced X-ray scanner offers a 3D cone beam option (Multitom Rax, Siemens Healthcare). The aim of this study was to evaluate various scan parameters and post-processing steps to optimize image quality and radiation exposure for imaging of the parasinus region. Four human cadaver heads were examined with different tube voltages (90–121 kV), dose levels (DLs) (278–2180 nGy) and pre-filtration methods (none, Cu 0.2 mm, Cu 0.3 mm and Sn 0.4 mm). All images were reconstructed in 2 mm slice thickness with and without a metal artifact reduction algorithm in three different kernels. In total, 80 different scan protocols and 480 datasets were evaluated. Image quality was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Radiation exposure (mean computed tomography volume index (CTDIvol) and effective dose) was calculated for each scan. The most dose-effective combination for the diagnosis of sinusitis was 121 kV/DL of 278/0.3 mm copper (CTDIvol 1.70 mGy, effective dose 77 µSv). Scan protocols with 121 kV/DL1090/0.3 mm copper were rated sufficient for preoperative sinus surgery planning (CTDIvol 4.66 mGy, effective dose 212 µSv). Therefore, sinusitis and preoperative sinus surgery planning can be performed in diagnostic image quality at low radiation dose levels with a multipurpose X-ray system.

Using 100- instead of 120-kVp computed tomography to diagnose pulmonary embolism almost halves the radiation dose with preserved diagnostic quality

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Björkdahl ◽  
Ulf Nyman
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Ct Number ◽  
Subjective Image Quality ◽  
Diagnostic Quality ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Tube Potential

Background: Concern has been raised regarding the mounting collective radiation doses from computed tomography (CT), increasing the risk of radiation-induced cancers in exposed populations. Purpose: To compare radiation dose and image quality in a chest phantom and in patients for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) at 100 and 120 peak kilovoltage (kVp) using 16-multichannel detector computed tomography (MDCT). Material and Methods: A 20-ml syringe containing 12 mg I/ml was scanned in a chest phantom at 100/120 kVp and 25 milliampere seconds (mAs). Consecutive patients underwent 100 kVp ( n = 50) and 120 kVp ( n = 50) 16-MDCT using a “quality reference” effective mAs of 100, 300 mg I/kg, and a 12-s injection duration. Attenuation (CT number), image noise (1 standard deviation), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR; fresh clot = 70 HU) of the contrast medium syringe and pulmonary arteries were evaluated on 3-mm-thick slices. Subjective image quality was assessed. Computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP) were presented by the CT software, and effective dose was estimated. Results: Mean values in the chest phantom and patients changed as follows when X-ray tube potential decreased from 120 to 100 kVp: attenuation +23% and +40%, noise +38% and +48%, CNR −6% and 0%, and CTDIvol −38% and −40%, respectively. Mean DLP and effective dose in the patients decreased by 42% and 45%, respectively. Subjective image quality was excellent or adequate in 49/48 patients at 100/120 kVp. No patient with a negative CT had any thromboembolism diagnosed during 3-month follow-up. Conclusion: By reducing X-ray tube potential from 120 to 100 kVp, while keeping all other scanning parameters unchanged, the radiation dose to the patient may be almost halved without deterioration of diagnostic quality, which may be of particular benefit in young individuals.

scholarly journals Establishing a quality assurance baseline for radiological protection of patients undergoing diagnostic radiology

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey K Korir ◽  
Jeska Sidika Wambani ◽  
Ian K Korir
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Patient Dose ◽  
Radiological Protection ◽  
X Ray ◽  
High Speed Film

Background. The wide use of ionising radiation in medical care has resulted in the largest man-made cause of radiation exposure. In recent years, diagnostic departments in Kenya have adapted the high-speed film/screen combination without well-established quality control, objective image quality criteria, and assessment of patient dose. The safety of patients in terms of justification and the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle is inadequate without quality assurance measures. Aim. This study assessed the level of film rejects, device performance, image quality and patient dose in 4 representative hospitals using high-speed film/screen combination. Results. The X-ray equipment quality control tests performance range was 67% to 90%, and 63% of the radiographs were of good diagnostic value. The measured prevalent chest examination entrance surface dose (ESD) showed levels above the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), while lumbar spine and pelvis examination was the largest source of radiation exposure to patients. Conclusion. The optimisation of patient protection can be achieved with optimally performing X-ray equipment, the application of good radiographic technique, and continuous assessment of radiographic image quality.

scholarly journals Patient Knowledge Regarding Radiation Exposure from Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0015
Author(s):  
Daniel Bohl ◽  
Blaine Manning ◽  
George Holmes ◽  
Simon Lee ◽  
Johnny Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Plain Film ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
X Ray

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Foot and ankle surgeons routinely prescribe diagnostic imaging that exposes patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study is to characterize patients’ knowledge regarding radiation exposure associated with common forms of foot and ankle imaging. Methods: A survey was administered to all new patients prior to their first foot and ankle clinic appointments. Patients were asked to compare the amount of harmful radiation associated with chest x-rays to that associated with various types of foot and ankle imaging. Results were tabulated and compared to actual values of radiation exposure from the published literature. Results: A total of 890 patients were invited to participate, of whom 791 (88.9%) completed the survey. The majority of patients believed that a foot x-ray, an ankle x-ray, a “low dose” CT scan of the foot and ankle (alluding to cone-beam CT), and a traditional CT scan of the foot and ankle all contain similar amounts of harmful ionizing radiation to a chest x-ray (Table 1). This is in contrast to the published literature, which suggests that foot x-rays, ankle x-rays, cone beam CT scans of the foot and ankle, and traditional CT scans of the foot and ankle expose patients to 0.006, 0.006, 0.127, and 0.833 chest x-rays worth of radiation. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that patients greatly over-estimate the amount of harmful ionizing radiation associated with plain film and cone-beam CT scans of the foot and ankle. Interestingly, their estimates of radiation associated with traditional CT scans of the foot and ankle were relatively accurate. Results suggest that patients may benefit from increased counseling by surgeons regarding the relatively low risk of radiation exposure associated with plain film and cone-beam CT imaging of the foot and ankle.

RESULTS OF CZECH NATIONAL STUDY OF RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM RADIOTHERAPY OF NON-MALIGNANT DISEASES, IN PARTICULAR OF HEEL SPURS

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 386-390
Author(s):  
V Dufek ◽  
H Zackova ◽  
L Kotik ◽  
I Horakova
Keyword(s):  
Czech Republic ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
National Study ◽  
Malignant Diseases ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Effective Doses

Abstract About 26 000 patients are treated per year with radiotherapy for non-malignant diseases in the Czech Republic. Approximately 75% of them are treated on X-ray therapy units and most of these patients undergo radiotherapy of heel spurs. The evaluation of radiation exposure of these patients was based on measured organ doses and on data from clinical practice. Collective effective doses for particular diagnoses were calculated in order to compare doses resulting from different diagnoses treated on X-ray therapy units. The collective effective dose from radiotherapy of heel spurs in the Czech Republic in 2013 was evaluated to 77 manSv. It represents 25.6% of the total collective effective dose for all diagnoses of radiotherapy for non-malignant diseases treated on X-ray therapy units.

scholarly journals DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE IN A LEVEL 1 TRAUMA CENTRE POPULATION MET WITH TRAUMA TEAM ACTIVATION: A ONE-YEAR PATIENT RECORD AUDIT

2020 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47
Author(s):  
Anna Bågenholm ◽  
Pål Løvhaugen ◽  
Rune Sundset ◽  
Tor Ingebrigtsen
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Reference Level ◽  
Dose Length Product ◽  
Trauma Team Activation ◽  
X Ray

Abstract This audit describes ionizing and non-ionizing diagnostic imaging at a regional trauma centre. All 144 patients (males 79.2%, median age 31 years) met with trauma team activation from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were included. We used data from electronic health records to identify all diagnostic imaging and report radiation exposure as dose area product (DAP) for conventional radiography (X-ray) and dose length product (DLP) and effective dose for CT. During hospitalization, 134 (93.1%) underwent X-ray, 122 (84.7%) CT, 92 (63.9%) focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), 14 (9.7%) ultrasound (FAST excluded) and 32 (22.2%) magnetic resonance imaging. One hundred and sixteen (80.5%) underwent CT examinations during trauma admissions, and 73 of 144 (50.7%) standardized whole body CT (SWBCT). DAP values were below national reference levels. Median DLP and effective dose were 2396 mGycm and 20.42 mSv for all CT examinations, and 2461 mGycm (national diagnostic reference level 2400) and 22.29 mSv for a SWBCT.

3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 108659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
Andreas Steven Kunz ◽  
Carsten Herbert Gietzen ◽  
Andreas Max Weng ◽  
Maike Veyhl-Wichmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
X Ray ◽  
System Assessment

scholarly journals Optimizing a perfusion CT protocol for head and neck cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Stüssi ◽  
Marta Bogowicz ◽  
Verena Weichselbaumer ◽  
Patrick Veit-Haibach ◽  
Oliver Riesterer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Image Resolution ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Scanning Protocol ◽  
Optimized Protocol

AbstractPerfusion computed tomography (CTP) images tumor angiogenesis and can assess tumor aggressiveness. However, the CTP examinations are dose intensive. This study aimed to optimize a routinely used CTP protocol for the head and neck region in oncology in order to reduce the effective dose to the patient and simultaneously achieve the same image quality.The Alderson phantom was scanned on a GE Revolution CT scanner. A scan with our standard protocol for head and neck cancer patients was used (100kV, 80mAs, 5mm slice thickness and backprojection algorithm) and in seven predefined regions (ROI) the signal to noise ratio (SNR) was measured. For the dose optimized protocol, the tube voltage was lowered and the mAs adaptation protocol was used. To improve image quality different percentage of an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) was applied. For a better resolution we set the slice thickness to 2.5 mm. The mAs adaption range and the percentage of the ASiR reconstruction were varied until we found a combination with the same median SNR in the seven defined ROIs as for our old protocol. For the old and the optimized protocol dose measurements were performed using 25 LiF-TLDs. Organ doses were calculated and the effective dose was determined based on the weighting factors of ICRP103.The optimized scanning protocol used a voltage of 80kV, a mAs range between 15 and 80, a noise level of 10%, and 50% ASiR reconstruction. The median SNR ratio was slightly better (14% better SNR) with the new protocol. An effective dose of 8 mSv was measured with the original protocol and 4 mSv with the optimized scanning protocol. For organs in the scanning field the dose was reduced by a factor of 2 and outside the field by a factor of 2.2.Advanced reconstruction algorithms allow a significant dose reduction and an improvement of image resolution, while maintaining the image quality.

scholarly journals Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?

2014 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Davies ◽  
A. J. Gislason-Lee ◽  
A. R. Cowen ◽  
S. M. Kengyelics ◽  
M. Lupton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Clinical Image ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Interventional Imaging ◽  
Cine Acquisition
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document