scholarly journals The Acute Influence of Running-Induced Fatigue on the Performance and Biomechanics of a Countermovement Jump

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peimin Yu ◽  
Zhen Gong ◽  
Yao Meng ◽  
Julien S Baker ◽  
Bíró István ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Rotation Angle ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Abduction Angle ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Flexion Moment ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

Lower limb kinematics and kinetics during the landing phase of jumping might change because of localized muscle fatigue. This study aimed to investigate the acute influence of running-induced fatigue on the performance and lower limb kinematics and kinetics of a countermovement jump. A running-induced fatigue protocol was applied to fifteen male subjects. Participants were asked to perform three successful countermovement jumps before and after fatigue. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected to compare any fatigue influences. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and paired-sample t-tests were used to analyze the data. Running-induced fatigue did not significantly change vertical jump height and peak vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) during the push-off and landing phases. Lower limb biomechanics significantly changed, especially kinematic parameters. During the push-off phase, fatigue resulted in an increased ankle peak inversion angle, knee minimal flexion angle, knee peak abduction angle, and hip peak flexion moment. In addition, the range of motion (ROM) of the ankle and knee joints in the frontal plane was also increased. Certain parameters decreased as a result of fatigue, such as the ankle peak internal rotation angle, hip peak abduction angle, the ROM of the ankle joint in the sagittal plane, and ROM of the hip joint in the frontal plane. During the landing phase, the peak inversion angle and peak external rotation angle of the ankle joint, peak abduction angle of the knee and hip joint, ROM of the ankle joint in the horizontal plane, ROM of the ankle and knee joint in the frontal plane were all increased as a result of fatigue. The knee peak flexion moment and hip peak extension moment, however, were decreased. Under fatigue conditions, lower limb kinetics and kinematics were changed during both the push-off and landing phases. More attention should be focused on the landing phase and the last period of the push-off phase due to potentially higher risks of injury. The findings of the current study may be beneficial to athletes and coaches in preventing jumping related injuries.

Analysis of the Relationships between Balance Ability and Walking in Terms of Muscle Activities and Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics

Biomechanics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-201
Author(s):  
Pathmanathan Cinthuja ◽  
Graham Arnold ◽  
Rami J. Abboud ◽  
Weijie Wang
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Vastus Medialis ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Balance Ability ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

There is a lack of evidence about the ways in which balance ability influences the kinematic and kinetic parameters and muscle activities during gait among healthy individuals. The hypothesis is that balance ability would be associated with the lower limb kinematics, kinetics and muscle activities during gait. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers (Age 32.8 ± 9.1; 18 males and 11 females) performed a Star Excursion Balance test to measure their dynamic balance and walked for at least three trials in order to obtain a good quality of data. A Vicon® 3D motion capture system and AMTI® force plates were used for the collection of the movement data. The selected muscle activities were recorded using Delsys® Electromyography (EMG). The EMG activities were compared using the maximum values and root mean squared (RMS) values within the participants. The joint angle, moment, force and power were calculated using a Vicon Plug-in-Gait model. Descriptive analysis, correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis were performed using SPSS version 23. In the muscle activities, positive linear correlations were found between the walking and balance test in all muscles, e.g., in the multifidus (RMS) (r = 0.800 p < 0.0001), vastus lateralis (RMS) (r = 0.639, p < 0.0001) and tibialis anterior (RMS) (r = 0.539, p < 0.0001). The regression analysis models showed that there was a strong association between balance ability (i.e., reaching distance) and the lower limb muscle activities (i.e., vastus medialis–RMS) (R = 0.885, p < 0.0001), and also between balance ability (i.e., reaching distance) and the lower limb kinematics and kinetics during gait (R = 0.906, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the results showed that vastus medialis (RMS) muscle activity mainly contributes to balance ability, and that balance ability influences the lower limb kinetics and kinematics during gait.

scholarly journals Lower-limb kinematics and kinetics during continuously varying human locomotion

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Reznick ◽  
Kyle R. Embry ◽  
Ross Neuman ◽  
Edgar Bolívar-Nieto ◽  
Nicholas P. Fey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Human Locomotion ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Stair Climbing ◽  
Constant Acceleration ◽  
Stair Ascent ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

AbstractHuman locomotion involves continuously variable activities including walking, running, and stair climbing over a range of speeds and inclinations as well as sit-stand, walk-run, and walk-stairs transitions. Understanding the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs during continuously varying locomotion is fundamental to developing robotic prostheses and exoskeletons that assist in community ambulation. However, available datasets on human locomotion neglect transitions between activities and/or continuous variations in speed and inclination during these activities. This data paper reports a new dataset that includes the lower-limb kinematics and kinetics of ten able-bodied participants walking at multiple inclines (±0°; 5° and 10°) and speeds (0.8 m/s; 1 m/s; 1.2 m/s), running at multiple speeds (1.8 m/s; 2 m/s; 2.2 m/s and 2.4 m/s), walking and running with constant acceleration (±0.2; 0.5), and stair ascent/descent with multiple stair inclines (20°; 25°; 30° and 35°). This dataset also includes sit-stand transitions, walk-run transitions, and walk-stairs transitions. Data were recorded by a Vicon motion capture system and, for applicable tasks, a Bertec instrumented treadmill.

Local Anesthesia of the Sole of the Foot Alters Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics During Running

2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S236
Author(s):  
Martin P. Schwellnus ◽  
Liane Azevedo ◽  
Rob Rayner ◽  
Regan Arendse ◽  
Timothy Noakes
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics ◽  
Sole Of The Foot

scholarly journals Exploring lumbar and lower limb kinematics and kinetics for evidence that lifting technique is associated with LBP

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254241
Author(s):  
Nic Saraceni ◽  
Amity Campbell ◽  
Peter Kent ◽  
Leo Ng ◽  
Leon Straker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Ecological Validity ◽  
Lifting Technique ◽  
Peak Knee ◽  
History Of ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Lift Off ◽  
Lifting Task ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

Purpose To investigate if lumbar and lower limb kinematics or kinetics are different between groups with and without a history of LBP during lifting. Secondly, to investigate relationships between biomechanical variables and pain ramp during repeated lifting. Methods 21 LBP and 20 noLBP participants completed a 100-lift task, where lumbar and lower limb kinematics and kinetics were measured during lifting, with a simultaneous report of LBP intensity every 10 lifts. Lifts were performed in a laboratory setting, limiting ecological validity. Results The LBP group used a different lifting technique to the noLBP group at the beginning of the task (slower and more squat-like). Kinetic differences at the beginning included less peak lumbar external anterior shear force and greater peak knee power demonstrated by the LBP group. However, at the end of the task, both groups lifted with a much more similar technique that could be classified as more stoop-like and faster. Peak knee power remained greater in the LBP group throughout and was the only kinetic difference between groups at the end of the lifting task. While both groups lifted using a more comparable technique at the end, the LBP group still demonstrated a tendency to perform a slower and more squat-like lift throughout the task. Only one of 21 variables (pelvic tilt at box lift-off), was associated with pain ramp in the LBP group. Conclusions: Workers with a history of LBP, lift with a style that is slower and more squat-like than workers without any history of LBP. Common assumptions that LBP is associated with lumbar kinematics or kinetics such as greater lumbar flexion or greater forces were not observed in this study, raising questions about the current paradigm around ‘safe lifting’.

How Reliable Are Lower-Limb Kinematics and Kinetics during a Drop Vertical Jump?

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Malfait ◽  
Sean Sankey ◽  
Raja M. Firhad Raja Azidin ◽  
Kevin Deschamps ◽  
Jos Vanrenterghem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics ◽  
Drop Vertical Jump
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document