scholarly journals Multi-Objective Optimization of Spatially Truss Structures Based on Node Movement

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1964
Author(s):  
Bo Nan ◽  
Yikui Bai ◽  
Yue Wu
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Front Surface ◽  
Truss Structures ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Discrete Structure ◽  
Maximum Displacement ◽  
C Language ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Discrete Structures

This paper discusses the solutions for topology optimization of spatially discrete structures. The optimization objects are the structural weight and the maximum displacement. The optimization variables include structural node coordinates, and the improved MOEA (Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm) method is used to optimize the structure. The innovation of this study is that it breaks through the shortage of constant node position in the optimization thought of traditionally discrete structure in the “Ground Structure Approach” and uses the coordinate of the node as the optimization variable for the optimization calculation. The result is not a single one but a set of optimal solutions through the evolution (i.e., Pareto optimal solutions); on this basis, the most suitable solution can be found according to the boundary conditions or other related requirements. Using the C# language to compile the calculation program, ANSYS finite element software is used to analyze the structure, and the Pareto front surface was automatically drawn to determine the optimal layout form of the discrete structure. The analysis results show that the improved MOEA method can provide an effective method to solve such optimization problems.

Multi Objective Design Optimization of Two Bar Truss Using NSGA II and TOPSIS

2014 ◽  
Vol 984-985 ◽  
pp. 419-424
Author(s):  
P. Sabarinath ◽  
M.R. Thansekhar ◽  
R. Saravanan
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Total Displacement ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Conflicting Objectives

Arriving optimal solutions is one of the important tasks in engineering design. Many real-world design optimization problems involve multiple conflicting objectives. The design variables are of continuous or discrete in nature. In general, for solving Multi Objective Optimization methods weight method is preferred. In this method, all the objective functions are converted into a single objective function by assigning suitable weights to each objective functions. The main drawback lies in the selection of proper weights. Recently, evolutionary algorithms are used to find the nondominated optimal solutions called as Pareto optimal front in a single run. In recent years, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) finds increasing applications in solving multi objective problems comprising of conflicting objectives because of low computational requirements, elitism and parameter-less sharing approach. In this work, we propose a methodology which integrates NSGA-II and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for solving a two bar truss problem. NSGA-II searches for the Pareto set where two bar truss is evaluated in terms of minimizing the weight of the truss and minimizing the total displacement of the joint under the given load. Subsequently, TOPSIS selects the best compromise solution.

scholarly journals An Effective Couple Method for Reliability-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Truss Structures with Static and Dynamic Constraints

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950016 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vo-Duy ◽  
D. Duong-Gia ◽  
V. Ho-Huu ◽  
T. Nguyen-Thoi
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Truss Structures ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Dynamic Constraints ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Couple Method

This paper proposes an effective couple method for solving reliability-based multi-objective optimization problems of truss structures with static and dynamic constraints. The proposed coupling method integrates a single-loop deterministic method (SLDM) into the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) algorithm to give the so-called SLDM-NSGA-II. Thanks to the advantage of SLDM, the probabilistic constraints are treated as approximating deterministic constraints. And therefore the reliability-based multi-objective optimization problems can be transformed into the deterministic multi-objective optimization problems of which the computational cost is reduced significantly. In these reliability-based multi-objective optimization problems, the conflicting objective functions are to minimize the weight and the displacements of the truss. The design variables are cross-section areas of the bars and contraints include static and dynamic constraints. For reliability analysis, the effect of uncertainty of parameters such as force, added mass in the nodes, material properties and cross-section areas of the bars are taken into account. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method are demonstrated through three benchmark-type truss structures including a 10-bar planar truss, a 72-bar spatial truss and a 200-bar planar truss. Moreover, the influence of parameters on the reliability-based Pareto optimal fronts is also carried out.

scholarly journals A New Method for Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Segment and Cloud Prediction

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Ni ◽  
Jiale Gao ◽  
Yafei Song ◽  
Wen Quan ◽  
Qinghua Xing
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Pareto Set ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Small Range ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Good Convergence ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
The Law ◽  
Cloud Theory

In the real world, multi-objective optimization problems always change over time in most projects. Once the environment changes, the distribution of the optimal solutions would also be changed in decision space. Sometimes, such change may obey the law of symmetry, i.e., the minimum of the objective function in such environment is its maximum in another environment. In such cases, the optimal solutions keep unchanged or vibrate in a small range. However, in most cases, they do not obey the law of symmetry. In order to continue the search that maintains previous search advantages in the changed environment, some prediction strategy would be used to predict the operation position of the Pareto set. Because of this, the segment and multi-directional prediction is proposed in this paper, which consists of three mechanisms. First, by segmenting the optimal solutions set, the prediction about the changes in the distribution of the Pareto front can be ensured. Second, by introducing the cloud theory, the distance error of direction prediction can be offset effectively. Third, by using extra angle search, the angle error of prediction caused by the Pareto set nonlinear variation can also be offset effectively. Finally, eight benchmark problems were used to verify the performance of the proposed algorithm and compared algorithms. The results indicate that the algorithm proposed in this paper has good convergence and distribution, as well as a quick response ability to the changed environment.

Evaluating the ε-Domination Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for a Quick Computation of Pareto-Optimal Solutions

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalyanmoy Deb ◽  
Manikanth Mohan ◽  
Shikhar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective

Since the suggestion of a computing procedure of multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization problems in the early Nineties, researchers have been on the look out for a procedure which is computationally fast and simultaneously capable of finding a well-converged and well-distributed set of solutions. Most multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) developed in the past decade are either good for achieving a well-distributed solutions at the expense of a large computational effort or computationally fast at the expense of achieving a not-so-good distribution of solutions. For example, although the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm or SPEA (Zitzler and Thiele, 1999) produces a much better distribution compared to the elitist non-dominated sorting GA or NSGA-II (Deb et al., 2002a), the computational time needed to run SPEA is much greater. In this paper, we evaluate a recently-proposed steady-state MOEA (Deb et al., 2003) which was developed based on the ε-dominance concept introduced earlier (Laumanns et al., 2002) and using efficient parent and archive update strategies for achieving a well-distributed and well-converged set of solutions quickly. Based on an extensive comparative study with four other state-of-the-art MOEAs on a number of two, three, and four objective test problems, it is observed that the steady-state MOEA is a good compromise in terms of convergence near to the Pareto-optimal front, diversity of solutions, and computational time. Moreover, the ε-MOEA is a step closer towards making MOEAs pragmatic, particularly allowing a decision-maker to control the achievable accuracy in the obtained Pareto-optimal solutions.

scholarly journals A NEW PROBABILISTIC ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING A CLASS OF SINGLE OR MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMAL PROBLEMS

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 11-26
Author(s):  
Hao Van Tran ◽  
Thong Huu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Fixed Number ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Probabilistic Algorithm ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Single Objective

We consider a class of single-objective optimization problems which haves the character: there is a fixed number k (1≤k<n) that is independent of the size n of the problem such that if we only need to change values of k variables then it has the ability to find a better solution than the current one, let us call it Ok. In this paper, we propose a new numerical optimization technique, Search Via Probability (SVP) algorithm, for solving single objective optimization problems of the class Ok. The SVP algorithm uses probabilities to control the process of searching for optimal solutions. We calculate probabilities of the appearance of a better solution than the current one on each of iterations, and on the performance of SVP algorithm we create good conditions for its appearance. We tested this approach by implementing the SVP algorithm on some test single-objective and multi objective optimization problems, and we found good and very stable results.

Robustness Against Large Variations in Multi-Objective Optimization Problems

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijun Wang ◽  
Stéphane Caro ◽  
Fouad Bennis
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Design Environment ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Uncertainty Sources ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Robustness Index ◽  
Environment Parameters

In the presence of multiple optimal solutions in multi-modal optimization problems and in multi-objective optimization problems, the designer may be interested in the robustness of those solutions to make a decision. Here, the robustness is related to the sensitivity of the performance functions to uncertainties. The uncertainty sources include the uncertainties in the design variables, in the design environment parameters, in the model of objective functions and in the designer’s preference. There exist many robustness indices in the literature that deal with small variations in the design variables and design environment parameters, but few robustness indices consider large variations. In this paper, a new robustness index is introduced to deal with large variations in the design environment parameters. The proposed index is bounded between zero and one, and measures the probability of a solution to be optimal with respect to the values of the design environment parameters. The larger the robustness index, the more robust the solution with regard to large variations in the design environment parameters. Finally, two illustrative examples are given to highlight the contributions of this paper.

Multi-Objective Optimal Control Design With the Simple Cell Mapping Method

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousef Sardahi ◽  
Yousef Naranjani ◽  
Wei Liang ◽  
Jian-Qiao Sun ◽  
Carlos Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Control ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Cell Mapping ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Simple Cell Mapping ◽  
Pareto Sets ◽  
Single Objective

Controls are often designed to meet different and conflicting goals. Consider the well-known LQR optimal control. The performance index contains a response measure and a control penalty, which are conflicting requirements. Proper linear or nonlinear combinations of the conflicting objective functions have led to single objective optimization problems. However, such a single objective optimization is dependent on the combination algorithm, and only provides a narrow window of all possible optimal solutions that a system may have. Multi-objective optimization provides a set of optimal solutions, known as Pareto set. There have been many studies of search algorithms for Pareto sets of multi-objective optimization problems for complex dynamical systems. Recently, the simple cell mapping (SCM) method due to C.S. Hsu has been found to be a highly effective tool to compute Pareto sets. This paper applies the SCM method to several control design problems of linear and nonlinear dynamical systems. The results of the work are very exciting to report.

MOTEO: A Novel Multi-Objective Thermal Exchange Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Design of Truss Structures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Khodadadi ◽  
Siamak Talatahari ◽  
Armin Dadras Eslamlou
Keyword(s):  
Structural Design ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Truss Structures ◽  
Metaheuristic Algorithm ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Thermal Exchange ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Pareto Fronts ◽  
Single Objective

Abstract In the present paper, a physics-inspired metaheuristic algorithm is presented to solve multi-objective optimization problems. The algorithm is developed based on the concept of Newtonian cooling law that recently has been employed by the Thermal Exchange Optimization (TEO) algorithm to efficiently solve single-objective optimization problems. The performance of the multi-objective version of TEO (MOTEO) is examined through bi- and tri-objective mathematical problems as well as bi-objective structural design examples. According to the comparisons between the MOTEO and several well-known algorithms, the proposed algorithm can provide quality Pareto fronts with appropriate accuracy, uniformity and coverage for multi-objective problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document