scholarly journals Land and Water Usage in Beef Production Systems

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald M. Broom
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Silvopastoral Systems ◽  
Water Usage ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Cattle Feed ◽  
Sustainable Systems ◽  
Intensive Rearing ◽  
The Impact

This analysis, using published data, compared all land and conserved water use in four beef production systems. A widespread feedlot system and fertilised irrigated pasture systems used similar amounts of land. However, extensive unmodified pasture systems used three times more land, and semi-intensive silvopastoral systems used four times less land, so the highest use was 13 times the lowest. The amount of conserved water used was 64% higher in feedlots with relatively intensive rearing systems than in fertilised irrigated pasture; in extensive unmodified pasture systems, it was 38% and in semi-intensive silvopastoral systems, it was 21% of the fertilised irrigated pasture value, so the highest use was eight times the lowest. If there was no irrigation of pasture or of plants used for cattle feed, the feedlot water use was 12% higher than the fertilised pasture use and 57% higher than that in semi-intensive silvopastoral systems. These large effects of systems on resource use indicate the need to consider all systems when referring to the impact of beef or other products on the global environment. Whilst the use of animals as human food should be reduced, herbivorous animals that consume food that humans cannot eat and are kept using sustainable systems are important for the future use of world resources.

scholarly journals Effect of Colored Shading Nets on the Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Pepper Grown under Semi-arid Conditions

2022 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Osama Mohawesh ◽  
Ammar Albalasmeh ◽  
Sanjit Deb ◽  
Sukhbir Singh ◽  
Catherine Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Sweet Pepper ◽  
Arid Environments ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Semi Arid

Colored shading nets have been increasingly studied in semi-arid crop production systems, primarily because of their ability to reduce solar radiation with the attendant reductions in air, plant, and soil temperatures. However, there is a paucity of research concerning the impact of colored shading nets on various crops grown under semi-arid environments, particularly the sweet pepper (Capsicum annum) production system. This study aimed to investigate the effects of three colored shading net treatments (i.e., white, green, and black shading nets with 50% shading intensity and control with unshaded conditions) on the growth and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) of sweet pepper. The results showed that all colored shading nets exhibited significantly lower daytime air temperatures and light intensity (22 to 28 °C and 9992 lx, respectively) compared with the control (32 to 37 °C and 24,973 lx, respectively). There were significant differences in sweet pepper growth performance among treatments, including plant height, shoot dry weight, leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, and vitamin C in ripened fruit. The enhanced photosynthetic rates were observed in sweet pepper plants under the colored shading nets compared with control plants. WUE increased among the colored shading net treatments in the following order: control ≤ white < black < green. Overall, the application of green and black shading nets to sweet pepper production systems under semi-arid environments significantly enhanced plant growth responses and WUE.

scholarly journals Influence of Beef Production System Technology on Calpain-1 Autolysis and Troponin-T Degradation

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. Johnson ◽  
J. K. Grubbs ◽  
K. R. Underwood ◽  
M. J. Webb ◽  
A. D. Blair
Keyword(s):  
Production System ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Myofibrillar Proteins ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Western Blots ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesBeef production systems utilize implants and β-agonists to improve beef cattle feed efficiency and promote muscle growth. Warner-Bratzler shear force values can be greater in strip loin steaks from cattle treated with implants or β-agonists. Calpain-1 degrades myofibrillar proteins post-mortem, thus altering calpain-1 activation or autolysis which can influence meat tenderness and proteolysis. The objective of this study was to determine the impact beef production system technologies on calpain-1 autolysis and troponin-T degradation as an indicator of tenderness formation and postmortem proteolysis.Materials and MethodsFrom a larger study, beef striploins (n = 16, n = 4/treatment) from cattle finished utilizing four different production systems were collected for analysis: 1) no antibiotics (NA; receiving no technology); 2) non-hormone treated cattle (NHTC; fed 300 mg monensin and 90 mg tylosin during the finishing phase); 3) implant (IMPL; same technologies as NHTC and administered a series of three implants including a low- potency calf implant [36 mg zeranol], a moderate-potency initial feedyard implant [80 mg trenbolone acetate and 16 mg estradiol], and a high potency finishing implant [200 mg of trenbolone acetate and 20 mg estradiol]; and 4) all previous technologies plus fed a β-agonist (IMBA; same technologies as IMPL and fed 200 mg ractopamine hydrochloride per steer per d). Striploins were vacuum packaged, aged for 7 d, and frozen. Western Blots were conducted for calpain-1 autolysis and troponin-T degradation (30 kDa). Abundance of calpain-1 bands and troponin-T degradation product was normalized by a reference on each gel. Treatments were evaluated in PROC MIXED of SAS 9.2 where least squares means and SEM were computed and separated using least significant differences (PDIFF) when tests for fixed effects were significant at P < 0.05 and trending P ≤ 0.10.ResultsCalpain-1 autolysis differed (P < 0.05) in the IMPL group compared to the NHTC group for both active, 78 kDa band, and the fully autolyzed, 76 kDa band. The IMPL group had a greater percentage (P = 0.0048) of active calpain-1 and a lower percentage (P = 0.0048) of fully autolyzed calpain-1 compared to the NHTC group. Also, a trend was detected when comparing both the active, 78 kDa band, and fully autolyzed, 76 kDa band, in the IMBA and IMPL group where the IMPL group had a greater percentage (P = 0.0727) of active calpain-1 and a lower percentage (P = 0.0727) of fully autolyzed calpain-1. Production system did not influence (P > 0.05) 30 kDa troponin-T product abundance.ConclusionThese data indicate level of technology may play a role in the activation and autolysis of calpain-1 from the 80 kDa inactive form to the 78 kDa active product and finally to the 76 kDa autolyzed product. Calpain-1 autolysis was not measured; however, these data suggest calpain-1 autolysis in the IMPL group may be limited compared with NHTC and IMBA groups. Consequently, calpain-1 may remain in the 78 kDa active form in the implanted cattle, actively degrading myofibrillar proteins. However, production system did not influence troponin-T 30 kDa degradation products. Further analysis of the rate of calpain-1 autolysis and troponin-T degradation at different days of postmortem aging could provide further evidence that different beef production technologies impact calpain-1 autolysis and postmortem proteolysis.

Successes and Problems with Measuring Water Consumption in Beef Systems

2019 ◽  
pp. 651-670
Author(s):  
Mieghan Bruce ◽  
Camille Bellet ◽  
Jonathan Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
Water Consumption ◽  
Food Systems ◽  
Water Footprint ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Multiple Uses ◽  
Large Water ◽  
Efficient Water Use ◽  
Livestock Systems

Beef production is considered to have a large water footprint, with values ranging from 3.3 to 75,000 L H20/kg. The water consumption in beef production is primarily associated with feed, estimated to be about 98%, with other requirements representing less than 1%. However, beef production is a complex system where cattle are often raised in different areas using a range of resources over their lifetime. This complexity is demonstrated using three countries with very different environments and production systems, namely Australia, Brazil, and Kenya. To achieve efficient water use in beef systems, and food systems more generally, a classification system that reflects how animals are managed, slaughtered, and processed is required. Methods for assessing water use in livestock systems, from production to consumption, need to be standardized, whilst also including the alternative uses, multiple uses, and benefits of a certain resource in a specific location.

Life-cycle assessment of the intensity of production on the greenhouse gas emissions and economics of grass-based suckler beef production systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 714-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. CLARKE ◽  
P. BRENNAN ◽  
P. CROSSON
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Bioeconomic Model ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
N Application ◽  
Application Rates ◽  
The Impact

SUMMARYIn Ireland, the largest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is agriculture. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of stocking intensities of beef cattle production systems on technical and economic performance and GHG emissions. A bioeconomic model of Irish suckler beef production systems was used to generate scenarios and to evaluate their technical and economic performance. To model the impact of each scenario on GHG emissions, the output of the bioeconomic model was used as an inventory analysis in a life-cycle assessment model and various GHG emission factors were integrated with the production profile. All the estimated GHG emissions were converted to their 100-year global warming potential carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). The scenarios modelled were bull/heifer and steer/heifer suckler beef production systems at varying stocking intensities. According to policy constraints, stocking intensities were based on the excretion of organic nitrogen (N), which varied depending on animal category. Stocking intensity was increased by increasing fertilizer N application rates. Carcass output and profitability increased with increasing stocking intensity. At a stocking intensity of 150 kg N/ha total emissions were lowest when expressed per kg of beef carcass (20·1 kg CO2e/kg beef) and per hectare (9·2 tCO2e/ha) in the bull/heifer system. Enteric fermentation was the greatest source of GHG emissions and ranged from 0·49 to 0·47 of total emissions with increasing stocking intensity for both production systems. The current study shows that increasing stocking intensity via increased fertilizer N application rates leads to increased profitability on beef farms with only modest increases in GHG emissions.

scholarly journals Environmental Sustainability in Beef Production and Life Cycle Assessment as a Tool for Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Pedro Henrique Presumido ◽  
Fernando Sousa ◽  
Artur Gonçalves ◽  
Tatiane Cristina Dal Bosco ◽  
Manuel Feliciano
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Meat Production ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Conservation Of Natural Resources ◽  
Intuitive Method ◽  
The Impact

The sustainability of meat production systems has been highlighted by the impact on the environment and the conservation of natural resources. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a specific review of the environmental sustainability of beef production in a life cycle assessment (LCA) context. Questions about the main environmental impacts caused by beef production were discussed. The phases of the LCA were detailed as well as the main functional units, boundaries of the systems and categories of impacts used in recent studies. LCA is a fast, easy and intuitive method that correlates human activities and their environmental performance in different sectors, such as beef production.

scholarly journals A Review of Beef Production Systems for the Sustainable Use of Surplus Male Dairy-Origin Calves Within the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi H. Rutherford ◽  
Francis O. Lively ◽  
Gareth Arnott
Keyword(s):  
Production Systems ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Sustainable Use ◽  
Dairy Herd ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Welfare Benefits ◽  
Market Requirements ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

The UK dairy herd is predominantly of the Holstein-Friesian (HF) breed, with a major emphasis placed on milk yield. Subsequently, following years of continued single-trait selection, the beef production potential of dairy bred calves has declined. Thus, male HF calves are commonly seen as a by-product of the dairy industry. Limited markets, perceived low economic value and high rearing costs mean that these surplus calves are often euthanised shortly after birth or exported to the EU for further production. Welfare concerns have been raised regarding both euthanasia and long distance transportation of these calves. Furthermore, total UK beef consumption increased by 8.5% from 2009 to 2019. Thus, in light of this growing demand, beef from the dairy herd could be better utilized within the UK. Therefore, the potential for these calves to be used in a sustainable, cost-effective beef production system with high welfare standards within the UK requires investigation. Thus, the aim of this review was to evaluate both steer and bull beef production systems, examining the impact on performance, health, welfare, and economic potential to enable a sustainable farming practice, while meeting UK market requirements. The principal conclusions from this review indicate that there is the potential for these calves to be used in UK based production systems and meet market requirements. Of the steer production systems, a 24 month system appears to achieve a balance between input costs, growth from pasture and carcass output, albeit the literature is undecided on the optimum system. The situation is similar for bull beef production systems, high input systems do achieve the greatest gain in the shortest period of time, however, these systems are not sustainable in volatile markets with fluctuating concentrate prices. Thus, again the inclusion of a grazing period, may increase the resilience of these systems. Furthermore, production systems incorporating a period at pasture are seen to have animal welfare benefits. The main welfare concern for surplus dairy bred calves is often poor colostrum management at birth. While in steer systems, consideration needs to be given to welfare regarding castration, with the negative impacts being minimized by completing this procedure soon after birth.

scholarly journals A simple dryland beef production system

1990 ◽  
pp. 129-132
Author(s):  
A.M. Nicol
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Production System ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Pasture Production ◽  
Cattle Feed ◽  
Target Animal ◽  
Gross Margins ◽  
Lincoln University

At Lincoln University, a small (3.7 ha) beef unit operates annually with the objective of closely fitting seasonal pasture growth rate to cattle feed demand on Canterbury dryland pasture with no requirement for making or feeding conserved feed. Inputs to this dryland pasture beef production system are kept low. Cattle are not purchased in autumn until the results of a feed budget show that pasture mass plus expected winter pasture growth will meet target animal winter intake. In some years not all cattle are bought at the same time, but the unit is fully stocked (around 6 cattle/ha) by the end of July. Cattle are sold for slaughter progressively from December through February as pasture production ceases to meet animal demands. Grazing methods typically vary from autumn-winter rotations of up to 100 days with weekly block grazing, to 6-paddock rotations of 28-34 days in spring and 2-paddock, 30-day spelling intervals later in the grazing season. The unit-consistently produces each year a carcass weight gain of 500 kg/ha with gross margins of around $400-600/ha representing a utilisation of 100 GJ ME/ha. This performance is consistent with that of other intensive beef production systems. Keywords beef production, dryland, seasonal pasture production

scholarly journals Water Use and Leaf Nutrient Status for Terraced Cherimoya Trees in a Subtropical Mediterranean Environment

Horticulturae ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Hugo Durán-Zuazo ◽  
Dionisio Franco Tarifa ◽  
Iván Francisco García-Tejero ◽  
Saray Gutiérrez Gordillo ◽  
Pedro Cermeño Sacristan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Crop Coefficient ◽  
Nutrient Status ◽  
Organic Production ◽  
Fruit Growth ◽  
Fruit Yield ◽  
Irrigated Agriculture ◽  
Agricultural Areas ◽  
The Impact

Water scarcity in many semi-arid agricultural areas, in particular for the Mediterranean basin, is promoting changes in irrigated agriculture, with alternative strategies being introduced for water-use optimization. The coast of Granada and Malaga (Southeast Spain) is an economically important area for subtropical fruit cultivation. This intensively irrigated agriculture is characterized by requiring extra amounts of water and the adoption of sustainable practices to improve agricultural water management. A two-season experiment was conducted to assess (1) the water use in terraced cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill. cv. Fino de Jete) orchards under conventional and organic production systems with drainage lysimeters, and (2) the impact on fruit yield and nutritional effects between the two considered production systems. Crop coefficient (Kc) values for cherimoya were 0.60–0.66, 0.64–0.71, and 0.48–0.62 at flowering, fruit set, and fruit growth, respectively. Fruit yield was similar in both systems, ranging from 47.1 for conventional to 44.1 kg tree−1 for organic farming, averaging 13.2 and 12.3 t·ha−1, respectively. No differences between these systems were observed in terms of leaf nutrient status, with variations in the N, P, and K contents during the different phenological stages. The N, P, and K lessen during flowering and fruit growth; the highest levels of these nutrients were fixed at harvest. These patterns were the opposite in Ca and Mg, ascribable to the antagonism between K and both Ca and Mg. Thus, these findings highlight the need to establish the optimal use of irrigation water with respect to crop requirements, thereby encouraging sustainable subtropical farming in terraces.

scholarly journals 144 A modeling framework to assess the impact of the texas beef cattle water footprint on livestock sustainability

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
Hector M Menendez ◽  
Benjamin L Turner ◽  
Luis O Tedeschi
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Water Footprint ◽  
Phase Region ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Anticipated growth in the demand for beef products driven by increased protein consumption, brings into question the efficiency, sustainability, profitability, and social dimensions of water use for U.S. beef production. Current assessment of U.S. beef production provides a wide range (695 to 14,191 L H2O/kg) of water footprint (WF) measurements of green (rainfed), blue (ground or surface), and grey (waste treatment) water use, but lacks defined region-specific estimates. The objective of this ongoing study is to develop a dynamic mathematical model for Texas beef cattle WF (TXWFB) that allows users to estimate a Texas WF, evaluate assumptions and parameters of current WF methodologies, identify water-use inefficiencies, and provide policy recommendations for a sustainable WF. The TXWFB was developed using Vensim DSS™ and evaluated with the Model Evaluation System™. The TXWFB model correctly replicated the previously published Chapagain and Hoekstra (2003; CH2003) water footprint results for beef cattle with a 36-month lifespan in both grazing [11,915 m3/t (0.4 t)] and industrial beef cattle [9636 m3/t (0.545 t)] systems. Then, parameters (diet composition and water footprints) from the CH2003 model were used as inputs into the TXWFB model to develop baseline scenarios for Texas, using ten climate regions (36-month lifespan; baseline grazing µ = 26,389 m3/t and industrial µ = 24,615 m3/t). The baseline results were then compared to grazing and industrial scenarios with regionalized Texas parameters for pasture, forage, and crop production (evapotranspiration, drought), diet/phase/region (cow-calf, stocker, and feedlot; 24 months). The TXWFB predictions for regional grazing (µ = 7,591 m3/t) and industrial (µ = 5,948 m3/t) results were 71 to 75% less than the baseline scenarios (P &lt; 0.05). We concluded that the TXWFB estimates were considerably smaller than those previously published, suggesting that current WF methodologies can be refined to more adequately assess beef cattle WF in the US.

scholarly journals Review: Impacts of shade on cattle well-being in the beef supply chain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily N Edwards-Callaway ◽  
M Caitlin Cramer ◽  
Caitlin N Cadaret ◽  
Elizabeth J Bigler ◽  
Terry E Engle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Construction Materials ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Ambient Temperatures ◽  
Stress Susceptibility ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Shade is a mechanism to reduce heat load providing cattle with an environment supportive of their welfare needs. Although heat stress has been extensively reviewed, researched, and addressed in dairy production systems, it has not been investigated in the same manner in the beef cattle supply chain. Like all animals, beef cattle are susceptible to heat stress if they are unable to dissipate heat during times of elevated ambient temperatures. There are many factors that impact heat stress susceptibility in beef cattle throughout the different supply chain sectors, many of which relate to the production system, i.e. availability of shade, microclimate of environment, and nutrition management. The results from studies evaluating the effects of shade on production and welfare are difficult to compare due to variation in structural design, construction materials used, height, shape, and area of shade provided. Additionally, depending on operation location, shade may or may not be beneficial during all times of the year, which can influence the decision to make shade a permanent part of management systems. Shade has been shown to lessen the physiologic response of cattle to heat stress. Shaded cattle exhibit lower respiration rates, body temperatures, and panting scores compared to un-shaded cattle in weather that increases the risk of heat stress. Results from studies investigating the provision of shade indicate that cattle seek shade in hot weather. The impact of shade on behavioral patterns is inconsistent in the current body of research, some studies indicating shade provision impacts behavior and other studies reporting no difference between shaded and un-shaded groups. Analysis of performance and carcass characteristics across feedlot studies demonstrated that shaded cattle had increased ADG, improved feed efficiency, HCW, and dressing percentage when compared to cattle without shade. Despite the documented benefits of shade, current industry statistics, although severely limited in scope, indicate low shade implementation rates in feedlots and data in other supply chain sectors do not exist. Industry guidelines and third party on-farm certification programs articulate the critical need for protection from extreme weather but are not consistent in providing specific recommendations and requirements. Future efforts should include: updated economic analyses of cost versus benefit of shade implementation, exploration of producer perspectives and needs relative to shade, consideration of shade impacts in the cow-calf and slaughter plant segments of the supply chain, and integration of indicators of affective (mental) state and preference in research studies to enhance the holistic assessment of cattle welfare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document