scholarly journals Turning Negatives into Positives for Pet Trading and Keeping: A Review of Positive Lists

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2371
Author(s):  
Elaine Toland ◽  
Monica Bando ◽  
Michèle Hamers ◽  
Vanessa Cadenas ◽  
Rob Laidlaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Agricultural Animal ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Public Health And Safety ◽  
Regulatory Challenges

The trading and keeping of exotic pets are associated with animal welfare, conservation, environmental protection, agricultural animal health, and public health concerns and present serious regulatory challenges to legislators and enforcers. Most legislation concerning exotic pet trading and keeping involves restricting or banning problematic species, a practice known as “negative listing”. However, an alternative approach adopted by some governments permits only the keeping of animals that meet certain scientifically proven criteria as suitable in respect of species, environmental, and public health and safety protections. We conducted an evaluation of positive lists for the regulation of pet trading and keeping within the context of the more prevalent system of restricting or prohibiting species via negative lists. Our examination of international, national, and regional regulations in Europe, the United States, and Canada found that criteria used for the development of both negative and positive lists were inconsistent or non-specific. Our online surveys of governments received limited responses, although telephone interviews with officials from governments either considering or developing positive lists provided useful insights into their attitudes and motivations towards adopting positive lists. We discuss key issues raised by civil servants including perceived advantages of positive lists and anticipated challenges when developing lists of suitable species. In addition, we compare functions of negative and positive lists, and recommend key principles that we hope will be helpful to governments concerning development and implementation of regulations based on positive lists.

scholarly journals Effects of Laws Expanding Civilian Rights to Use Deadly Force in Self-Defense on Violence and Crime: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e14
Author(s):  
Alexa R. Yakubovich ◽  
Michelle Degli Esposti ◽  
Brittany C. L. Lange ◽  
G. J. Melendez-Torres ◽  
Alpa Parmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Deadly Force ◽  
Us States ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Social Inequities ◽  
Public Health And Safety

Background. Since 2005, most US states have expanded civilian rights to use deadly force in self-defense outside the home. In most cases, legislation has included removing the duty to retreat anywhere one may legally be, commonly known as stand-your-ground laws. The extent to which these laws affect public health and safety is widely debated in public and policy discourse. Objectives. To synthesize the available evidence on the impacts and social inequities associated with changing civilian rights to use deadly force in self-defense on violence, injury, crime, and firearm-related outcomes. Search Methods. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts, National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts, Education Resources Information Center, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, National Bureau of Economic Research working papers, and SocArXiv; harvested references of included studies; and consulted with experts to identify studies until April 2020. Selection Criteria. Eligible studies quantitatively estimated the association between laws that expanded or restricted the right to use deadly force in self-defense and population or subgroup outcomes among civilians with a comparator. Data Collection and Analysis. Two reviewers extracted study data using a common form. We assessed study quality using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tools adapted for (controlled) before–after studies. To account for data dependencies, we conducted graphical syntheses (forest plots and harvest plots) to summarize the evidence on impacts and inequities associated with changing self-defense laws. Main Results. We identified 25 studies that estimated population-level impacts of laws expanding civilian rights to use deadly force in self-defense, all of which focused on stand-your-ground or other expansions to self-defense laws in the United States. Studies were scored as having serious or critical risk of bias attributable to confounding. Risk of bias was low across most other domains (i.e., selection, missing data, outcome, and reporting biases). Stand-your-ground laws were associated with no change to small increases in violent crime (total and firearm homicide, aggravated assault, robbery) on average across states. Florida-based studies showed robust increases (24% to 45%) in firearm and total homicide while self-defense claims under stand-your-ground law were more often denied when victims were White, especially when claimants were racial minorities. Author’s Conclusions. The existing evidence contradicts claims that expanding self-defense laws deters violent crime across the United States. In at least some contexts, including Florida, stand-your-ground laws are associated with increases in violence, and there are racial inequities in the application of these laws. Public Health Implications. In some US states, most notably Florida, stand-your-ground laws may have harmed public health and safety and exacerbated social inequities. Our findings highlight the need for scientific evidence on both population and equity impacts of self-defense laws to guide legislative action that promotes public health and safety for all. Trial Registration. Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/uz68e ). (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print February 23, 2021: e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306101 )

Building Safety Partnerships Using Social Network Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Sorensen ◽  
Devon Brewer ◽  
Lynae Wyckoff ◽  
Melissa Horsman ◽  
Erika Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Network ◽  
Social Network Analysis ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Social Marketing ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
Tractor Safety ◽  
Public Health And Safety ◽  
Safety Initiative

Although public–private partnerships have been useful components in public health and safety initiatives, little has been published on how to cultivate effective public health and safety partnerships for upstream social marketing initiatives. Using the development of a U.S. tractor safety alliance as an example, we illustrate how social network analysis can be used to identify organizations that are likely to be strategic partners and targets for upstream social marketing. In our project, knowledgeable informants first identified members of a national agricultural stakeholder network in the United States. Then, we surveyed the representatives of these organizations about their organizations’ interest in joining a new U.S. tractor safety initiative, the connections between their own and other stakeholder organizations, and their perceptions of the organizations most able to advance a U.S. tractor safety initiative. From our analysis of these data, we identified 10 organizations that have the partnerships, resources, and interest necessary to lead an effective tractor safety partnership. These organizations will be the focus of an upstream social marketing initiative aimed at building a strategic tractor safety alliance.

scholarly journals Words Can Be Deceiving: A Review of Variation among Legally Effective Medical Marijuana Laws in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalie L. Pacula ◽  
Anne E. Boustead ◽  
Priscillia Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Medical Marijuana ◽  
The United States ◽  
Us States ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Public Debates ◽  
Medical Marijuana Laws ◽  
Recreational Use ◽  
Public Health And Safety

AbstractWhen voters in two US states approved the recreational use of marijuana in 2012, public debates for how best to promote and protect public health and safety started drawing implications from states’ medical marijuana laws (MMLs). However, many of the discussions were simplified to the notion that states either have an MML or do not; little reference was made to the fact that legal provisions differ across states. This study seeks to clarify the characteristics of state MMLs in place since 1990 that are most relevant to consumers/patients and categorizes those aspects most likely to affect the prevalence of use, and consequently the intensity of public health and welfare effects. Evidence shows treating MMLs as homogeneous across states is misleading and does not reflect the reality of MML making. This variation likely has implications for use and health outcomes, and thus states’ public health.

scholarly journals Bacteriological analysis of indoor and outdoor water parks in Wisconsin

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 452-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracynda L. Davis ◽  
Jon H. Standridge ◽  
Alan J. Degnan
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Heterotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Public ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Physical Injuries ◽  
Health Community ◽  
Bacteriological Testing ◽  
Public Health And Safety

Water parks are a rapidly growing element of the United States tourist industry. To reduce incidence of abrasion and impact injuries in such parks, designers are searching for padding materials that can withstand the harsh oxidative environments of chlorinated water. Although padded features help reduce physical injuries, they may also compromise the microbiological safety of water attractions. This study describes bacteriological testing performed on 31 different pad materials, play features and pools from 10 Wisconsin water parks. Materials and surrounding pool waters were sampled and tested quantitatively for total coliforms, Escherichia coli, E. coli 0157:H7, enterococci, staphylococci, heterotrophic bacteria, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using standard methods. Each location was sampled during three visits, and results were averaged. Pool waters were within acceptable levels of target organisms and disinfectant residuals, but target organisms were found on water features, even those submerged in chlorinated water. Bacteria were detected more frequently in pools using pad materials compared with pools without. These findings provide data that will help the public health community understand the relations between designs, materials and maintenance of water features. Additionally, the information will help state regulators and owner/operators develop guidelines to improve public health and safety at water parks.

scholarly journals Implications of the Coronavirus on Sales Tax Revenue and Local Government Fiscal Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-400
Author(s):  
Bruce D. McDonald, III ◽  
Sarah E. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sales Tax ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Fiscal Health ◽  
Public Health And Safety

The outbreak of COVID—19 has raised considerable alarm about public health and safety. The response to the outbreak, however, has also brought concern regarding its impact on local governments in the United States. Local governments have been a primary respondent in the fight against the COVID—19 disease, but the response has also reduced income from a key source of revenue, sales tax. Using North Carolina counties as a case study, we explore the shock to sales and use tax revenue faced by local governments from COVID—19; we, then, estimate its impact on county fiscal health. Our results show that while many local governments were financially struggling before the outbreak, the drop in sales tax revenue severely threatens their ability to provide continued response to the virus as well as their ability to remain solvent.

scholarly journals Wildlife-pet markets in a one-health context

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-64
Author(s):  
Clifford Warwick ◽  
Catrina Steedman
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
One Health ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Species Conservation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Observational Research ◽  
Health State ◽  
Domesticated Animals ◽  
Agricultural Animal

Background and Aim: Wildlife markets are centers of trade involving live animals and their derivatives from wild-caught and captive-bred non-domesticated animals, including for the culinary, fashion, traditional medicine, curio, and pet sectors. These markets occur in Southeast Asia, India, North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa, and elsewhere. This study aims to address a diversity of related issues that have a one-health bearing while focusing on wildlife markets in relation to the pet trade. Across relevant regions and countries, all major animal classes are traded at wildlife-pet markets. Wildlife markets, in general, are considered distinct from so-called "wet markets" at which domesticated animals, fish, and other "seafood" are offered only for consumption. Several aspects of wildlife markets have attracted scientific and popular scrutiny, including animal welfare concerns, species conservation threats, legality, ecological alteration, introduction of invasive alien species, presence of undescribed species, and public and agricultural animal health issues. Materials and Methods: Onsite inspections were conducted for markets in the United States, Spain, Germany, The Netherlands, and the UK, as well as observational research of visual imagery of market conditions, and we compared these conditions with evidence-based standards for animal welfare and public health management. Results: Wildlife markets globally shared common similar structures and practices including the presence of sick, injured, or stressed animals; mixing of animals of uncertain origin and health state; and no specific or any hygiene protocols, with issues of animal welfare, public health and safety, agricultural animal health, and other one-health concerns being inherently involved. Conclusion: We conclude that wildlife markets are incompatible with responsible standards and practices, and we recommend that such events are banned globally to ameliorate inherent major problems.

Decompression Sickness Risk Assessment and Awareness in General Aviation

2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
Michael F. Harrison ◽  
William P. Butler ◽  
M. Hassan Murad ◽  
Gary N. Toups
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decompression Sickness ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Medical Attention ◽  
Online Discussion Forum ◽  
Aircraft Performance ◽  
Public Health And Safety

INTRODUCTION: Decompression sickness (DCS) can occur during unpressurized flight to altitudes >18,000 ft (FL180; 5486 m). To our knowledge, this has not been studied in general aviation (GA). This knowledge gap may have public health and safety implications because the most popular models of GA aircraft by sales volume are capable of flying >FL180.METHODS: Data from a 1-yr period in a commercial flight tracking database were analyzed to identify flights >FL180 in unpressurized, piston aircraft in the United States. Peak altitude and duration at that altitude were used to calculate DCS risk employing the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Altitude Decompression Sickness Risk Assessment Computer (ADRAC). Registration numbers were cross referenced in publicly available federal databases to identify any events that might be attributable to impairment due to DCS. A web-based survey of practices and associated symptoms was also made available to GA pilots through an online discussion forum.RESULTS: During the data collection period, 1696 flights occurred. The DCS risk was calculated to be 1.9 4.2%. There were 42 responses to the survey. Of these, 25 (59.5%) pilots reported having flown at altitudes >FL180 and 21 (84%) of them reported symptoms possibly attributable to DCS. None sought medical attention. No safety events were identified for any of the aircraft during the study period.CONCLUSION: The risk of DCS in the GA community is not zero. As GA aircraft performance profiles advance and sales increase, this may have significant implications from a public health and safety perspective. Further study is warranted.Harrison MF, Butler WP, Murad MH, Toups GN. Decompression sickness risk assessment and awareness in general aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(3):138145.

scholarly journals United States Supreme Court Approach to First Amendment Freedom of Religion in Response to the COVID Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-261
Author(s):  
Delaine Russell Swenson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
First Amendment ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
United States Supreme Court ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Constitution ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
The Right ◽  
Public Health And Safety

The 2020-21 Covid 19 Pandemic has raised many legal challenges as governments world-wide have struggled to deal with the public health and safety challenges of Covid. At the center of many of these decisions is the need to balance public health protections against other rights that have been infringed by legislation related to Covid Pandemic restrictions. One of the most important rights that have been implicated by Covid restrictions in the United States has been in the area of restrictions on religious worship which implicates the right to freedom of religion as enshrined in the United States Constitution. During the time of the Pandemic the United States Supreme Court, as the final arbiter of the United States Constitution has had to work to balance the interests of the government in protecting public health and safety with the right to freedom of religion. The Supreme Court’s approach to these cases reflects the difficulties inherent in balancing two such important interests in difficult circumstances and also represents the reality of the shifting majority in the Court as a result of new Justices appointed under the administration of Donald Trump. The Court has transitioned from a majority that opposed restrictions on governmental action during COVID to a majority that is more willing to stop governmental action that is deemed to be in violation of the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment.

scholarly journals Dual MD–MPH Degree Students in the United States: Moving the Medical Workforce Toward Population Health

2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492097842
Author(s):  
Jo Marie Reilly ◽  
Christine M. Plepys ◽  
Michael R. Cousineau
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Health Care Policy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Master Of Public Health ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Public Health Training ◽  
The Impact

Objective A growing need exists to train physicians in population health to meet the increasing need and demand for physicians with leadership, health data management/metrics, and epidemiology skills to better serve the health of the community. This study examines current trends in students pursuing a dual doctor of medicine (MD)–master of public health (MPH) degree (MD–MPH) in the United States. Methods We conducted an extensive literature review of existing MD–MPH databases to determine characteristics (eg, sex, race/ethnicity, MPH area of study) of this student cohort in 2019. We examined a trend in the MD community to pursue an MPH career, adding additional public health and health care policy training to the MD workforce. We conducted targeted telephone interviews with 20 admissions personnel and faculty at schools offering MD–MPH degrees in the United States with the highest number of matriculants and graduates. Interviews focused on curricula trends in medical schools that offer an MD–MPH degree. Results No literature describes the US MD–MPH cohort, and available MD–MPH databases are limited and incomplete. We found a 434% increase in the number of students pursuing an MD–MPH degree from 2010 to 2018. The rate of growth was greater than the increase in either the number of medical students (16%) or the number of MPH students (65%) alone. Moreover, MD–MPH students as a percentage of total MPH students more than tripled, from 1.1% in 2010 to 3.6% in 2018. Conclusions As more MD students pursue public health training, the impact of an MPH degree on medical school curricula, MD–MPH graduates, and MD–MPH career pursuits should be studied using accurate and comprehensive databases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document