scholarly journals Comparison of Droplet Deposition Control Efficacy on Phytophthora capsica and Aphids in the Processing Pepper Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Knapsack Sprayer

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinggang Xiao ◽  
Rui Du ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Xiaoqiang Han ◽  
Sifeng Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Droplet Deposition ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Control Efficacy ◽  
Continuous Growth ◽  
Knapsack Sprayer ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Pillar Industry

Processing pepper planting and processing have become an important red pillar industry in Xinjiang. With the continuous growth of processing pepper planting areas in Xinjiang, diseases and pests are increasing year by year. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition and control efficiency of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) sprayers on a processing pepper field. The UAV sprayer had a poor droplet coverage rate, droplet density, and deposition uniformity, but displayed the best deposition (1.01 μg/cm2, which was 98% more than the EAP sprayer). The control efficacy of the UAV sprayer on processing pepper fields with Phytophthora capsici and aphids was slightly lower than that of the EAP sprayer. When the UAV sprayer was used to control processing pepper diseases and pests, it could reduce the pesticide dosage on the premise of ensuring the control effect. Further study of the residue of high concentration pesticides in pepper fruit and environment sprayed by UAVs are needed.

scholarly journals Droplet Deposition and Control of Planthoppers of Different Nozzles in Two-Stage Rice with a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Pengchao Chen ◽  
Yubin Lan ◽  
Xiaoyu Huang ◽  
Haixia Qi ◽  
Guobin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Droplet Deposition ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Flowering Stage ◽  
Rice Planthoppers ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Carrier Volume ◽  
And Control

Previous studies have confirmed that choosing nozzles that produce coarser droplets could reduce the risk of pesticide spray drift, but this conclusion is based on a large volume of application, and it is easy to ignore how this impacts the control effect. The difference from the conventional spray is that the carrier volume of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is very limited. Little was known about how to choose suitable nozzles with UAV’s limited volume to ensure appropriate pest control. Droplet deposition with the addition of adjuvant and the LU110-010, LU110-015, and LU110-020 nozzles and control of planthoppers within nozzles treatments were studied by a quadrotor UAV in rice (Tillering and Flowering stages). Allura Red (10 g/L) was used as a tracer and Kromekote cards were used to collect droplet deposits. The results indicate that the density of the droplets covered by the LU110-01 nozzle is well above other treatments, while the differences in droplet deposition and coverage are not significant. The deposition and coverage were improved with the addition of adjuvant, especially in LU110-01 nozzles’ treatment. The control effects of rice planthoppers treated by LU110-01 nozzle were 89.4% and 90.8% respectively, which were much higher than 67.6% and 58.5% of LU110-020 nozzle at 7 days in the Tillering and Flowering stage. The results suggest that selecting a nozzle with a small atomizing particle size for UAV could improve the control effect of planthoppers.

Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Cai Qin ◽  
Bai-Jing Qiu ◽  
Xin-Yu Xue ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Zhu-Feng Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Droplet Deposition ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
And Control

scholarly journals Minimizing Occupational Exposure to Pesticide and Increasing Control Efficacy of Pests by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Application on Cowpea

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 9579
Author(s):  
Xiaojing Yan ◽  
Yangyang Zhou ◽  
Xiaohui Liu ◽  
Daibin Yang ◽  
Huizhu Yuan
Keyword(s):  
High Efficiency ◽  
Pesticide Exposure ◽  
Plant Protection ◽  
Exposure Level ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Control Efficacy ◽  
Tropical Regions ◽  
Field Control ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Ground Spraying

Pesticide operators are often exposed to high levels of contaminants, leading to potential adverse health impacts on these agricultural workers. In tropical regions, pesticide applicators are more vulnerable to dermal exposure than their counterparts in temperate regions. Thus, it is highly desirable to develop new spraying methods to minimize the pesticide exposure level without sacrificing the pest control efficiency. Due to their flexibility, high efficiency, and lower labor intensity, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have attracted considerable attention in precision pest management. However, the pesticide operator exposure assessment during the spraying application with UAVs, especially the comparison with conventional ground sprayers, has not been well investigated. In this work, the control effect against thrips on cowpea and operator exposure determination by aerial and ground spraying in Hainan Province were carried out and compared. When biopesticide spinetoram with the same dosage was applied, the field control efficacy against cowpea thrips sprayed by UAVs was higher than that of knapsack electric sprayers. Moreover, UAV spraying could greatly reduce water consumption and working time. For UAV spraying, when the amounts of water applied per hectare were 22.5, 30, and 37.5 L, the control effects on thrips on the first day were about 69.79%, 80.15%, and 80.58%, respectively. When Allura Red as a pesticide surrogate was applied under similar spraying scenarios with the field control against thrips on cowpea, the average total unit exposure of the knapsack operator (1952.02 mg/kg) was greatly higher than that of the UAV operator (134.51 mg/kg). The present research indicates that plant protection UAV is the direction of development of modern intensive sustainable agriculture.

Numerical Simulation and Experimental Verification of the Deposition Concentration of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Shi ◽  
Hanping Mao ◽  
Xianping Guan
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Simulation Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laser Scanner ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Droplet Deposition ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Motion Characteristics

Abstract. To analyze the droplet deposition under the influence of the flow field of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a hand-held three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner was used to scan 3D images of the UAV. Fluent software was used to simulate the motion characteristics of droplets and flow fields under the conditions of a flight speed of 3 m/s and an altitude of 1.5 m. The results indicated that the ground deposition concentration in the nonrotor flow field was high, the spray field width was 2.6 m, and the droplet deposition concentration was 50 to 200 ug/cm2. Under the influence of the rotor flow field, the widest deposition range of droplets reached 12.8 m. Notably, the droplet deposition uniformity worsened, and the concentration range of the droplet deposition was 0 to 500 ug/cm2. With the downward development of the downwash flow field, the overall velocity of the flow field gradually decreased, and the influence interval of the flow field gradually expanded. In this article, the droplet concentration was verified under simulated working conditions by a field experiment, thereby demonstrating the reliability of the numerical simulation results. This research could provide a basis for determining optimal UAV operating parameters, reducing the drift of droplets and increasing the utilization rate of pesticides. Keywords: Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), Aerial application, Downwash flow field, Droplet deposition, Simulation analysis.

scholarly journals Online Adaptive Error Compensation SVM-Based Sliding Mode Control of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaijia Xue ◽  
Congqing Wang ◽  
Zhiyu Li ◽  
Hanxin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Sliding Mode Control ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Error Compensation ◽  
Sliding Mode ◽  
Control Process ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Unknown Parameters ◽  
Mode Control ◽  
Aerial Vehicle

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is a nonlinear dynamic system with uncertainties and noises. Therefore, an appropriate control system has an obligation to ensure the stabilization and navigation of UAV. This paper mainly discusses the control problem of quad-rotor UAV system, which is influenced by unknown parameters and noises. Besides, a sliding mode control based on online adaptive error compensation support vector machine (SVM) is proposed for stabilizing quad-rotor UAV system. Sliding mode controller is established through analyzing quad-rotor dynamics model in which the unknown parameters are computed by offline SVM. During this process, the online adaptive error compensation SVM method is applied in this paper. As modeling errors and noises both exist in the process of flight, the offline SVM one-time mode cannot predict the uncertainties and noises accurately. The control law is adjusted in real-time by introducing new training sample data to online adaptive SVM in the control process, so that the stability and robustness of flight are ensured. It can be demonstrated through the simulation experiments that the UAV that joined online adaptive SVM can track the changing path faster according to its dynamic model. Consequently, the proposed method that is proved has the better control effect in the UAV system.

scholarly journals Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guobin Wang ◽  
Yubin Lan ◽  
Huizhu Yuan ◽  
Haixia Qi ◽  
Pengchao Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Control Efficacy ◽  
Wheat Field ◽  
Run Off ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Deposition Uniformity ◽  
Working Efficiency ◽  
Deposition Control

As a new low volume application technology, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) application is developing quickly in China. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition, control efficacy and working efficiency of a six-rotor UAV with a self-propelled boom sprayer and two conventional knapsack sprayers on the wheat crop. The total deposition of UAV and other sprayers were not statistically significant, but significantly lower for run-off. The deposition uniformity and droplets penetrability of the UAV were poor. The deposition variation coefficient of the UAV was 87.2%, which was higher than the boom sprayer of 31.2%. The deposition on the third top leaf was only 50.0% compared to the boom sprayer. The area of coverage of the UAV was 2.2% under the spray volume of 10 L/ha. The control efficacy on wheat aphids of UAV was 70.9%, which was comparable to other sprayers. The working efficiency of UAV was 4.11 ha/h, which was roughly 1.7–20.0 times higher than the three other sprayers. Comparable control efficacy results suggest that UAV application could be a viable strategy to control pests with higher efficiency. Further improvement on deposition uniformity and penetrability are needed.

scholarly journals Taxiing Characteristic Analysis and Control for Full-Wing Solar-Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Zhenyu Ma ◽  
Xiaoping Zhu ◽  
Zhou Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Good Control ◽  
Front Wheel ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Control Approach ◽  
Disturbance Rejection Control ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Solar Powered ◽  
Propeller Thrust

To solve the taxiing control problem of the full-wing solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) without front wheel steering servo and rudder, a control approach using differential propeller thrust to control the taxiing is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the taxiing mathematical models of two kinds of full-wing solar-powered UAVs with the front wheels turning freely or fixed are established. Meanwhile, the taxiing characteristics of full-wing solar-powered UAV in different taxiing speeds are analyzed. Secondly, based on the linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) theory, a yaw angle controller is designed by using differential propeller thrust as the control output. Finally, a straight line trajectory tracking scheme which is suitable for take-off and landing taxiing is designed on the base of improved vector field theory. Simulation results show that the designed controller has a good control effect on full-wing solar-powered UAV's take-off and landing taxiing periods, and better robustness.

scholarly journals Effect of Aviation Spray Adjuvants on Defoliant Droplet Deposition and Cotton Defoliation Efficacy Sprayed by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinggang Xiao ◽  
Fang Xin ◽  
Zhaoxia Lou ◽  
Tingting Zhou ◽  
Guobin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Vegetable Oil ◽  
Impurity Content ◽  
Coverage Rate ◽  
Droplet Deposition ◽  
Aerial Vehicles ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Spray Adjuvants

Defoliant spraying is an important aspect of mechanized cotton harvesting. Fully and uniformly spraying defoliant could improve the quality of defoliation and reduce the impurity content in cotton. Improving the coverage of defoliant droplets in the middle and lower layers of cotton and ensuring the full and even dispersion of droplets in the cotton canopy are essentially in increasing the defoliation effect. In this study, we assessed the effect of aviation spray adjuvants on droplet deposition, defoliation, boll opening and defoliant retention in cotton leaves sprayed by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The results showed that adding aviation spray adjuvants could significantly improve the defoliant droplet deposition. Fifteen days after spraying, the defoliation rate was 80.31% and the boll opening was 90.61%. The defoliation rate increased by 3.12–34.62% and the boll opening rate increased by 6.67–29.56% after the addition of aviation spray adjuvants. Using a vegetable oil adjuvant could significantly increase the droplet coverage rate and the retention of defoliants in cotton leaves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document