scholarly journals A New Chaotic-Based Approach for Multi-Objective Optimization

Algorithms ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
Nassime Aslimani ◽  
Talbi El-ghazali ◽  
Rachid Ellaia
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Chaotic Search ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Search Approach

Multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) have been widely studied during the last decades. In this paper, we present a new approach based on Chaotic search to solve MOPs. Various Tchebychev scalarization strategies have been investigated. Moreover, a comparison with state of the art algorithms on different well known bound constrained benchmarks shows the efficiency and the effectiveness of the proposed Chaotic search approach.

A Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems Containing an Infinite Number of Parameterized Objectives

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliot Rudnick-Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Infinite Number ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Pareto Frontier ◽  
Brute Force ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Brute Force Approach ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Multi-objective decision making problems can sometimes involve an infinite number of objectives. In this paper, an approach is presented for solving multi-objective optimization problems containing an infinite number of parameterized objectives, termed “infinite objective optimization”. A formulation is given for infinite objective optimization problems and an approach for checking whether a Pareto frontier is a solution to this formulation is detailed. Using this approach, a new sampling based approach is developed for solving infinite objective optimization problems. The new approach is tested on several different example problems and is shown to be faster and perform better than a brute force approach.

A Memetic Optimization Strategy Based on Dimension Reduction in Decision Space

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Handing Wang ◽  
Licheng Jiao ◽  
Ronghua Shang ◽  
Shan He ◽  
Fang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Dimension Reduction ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Optimization Strategy ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Decision Space ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Decision Variables

There can be a complicated mapping relation between decision variables and objective functions in multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). It is uncommon that decision variables influence objective functions equally. Decision variables act differently in different objective functions. Hence, often, the mapping relation is unbalanced, which causes some redundancy during the search in a decision space. In response to this scenario, we propose a novel memetic (multi-objective) optimization strategy based on dimension reduction in decision space (DRMOS). DRMOS firstly analyzes the mapping relation between decision variables and objective functions. Then, it reduces the dimension of the search space by dividing the decision space into several subspaces according to the obtained relation. Finally, it improves the population by the memetic local search strategies in these decision subspaces separately. Further, DRMOS has good portability to other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs); that is, it is easily compatible with existing MOEAs. In order to evaluate its performance, we embed DRMOS in several state of the art MOEAs to facilitate our experiments. The results show that DRMOS has the advantage in terms of convergence speed, diversity maintenance, and portability when solving MOPs with an unbalanced mapping relation between decision variables and objective functions.

scholarly journals An Ensemble Framework of Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization

Symmetry ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Junhua Ku ◽  
Fei Ming ◽  
Wenyin Gong
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Real World ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
The Real ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
The Past ◽  
Hypervolume Indicator ◽  
Real World Problems

In the real-world, symmetry or asymmetry widely exists in various problems. Some of them can be formulated as constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). During the past few years, handling CMOPs by evolutionary algorithms has become more popular. Lots of constrained multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) have been proposed. Whereas different CMOEAs may be more suitable for different CMOPs, it is difficult to choose the best one for a CMOP at hand. In this paper, we propose an ensemble framework of CMOEAs that aims to achieve better versatility on handling diverse CMOPs. In the proposed framework, the hypervolume indicator is used to evaluate the performance of CMOEAs, and a decreasing mechanism is devised to delete the poorly performed CMOEAs and to gradually determine the most suitable CMOEA. A new CMOEA, namely ECMOEA, is developed based on the framework and three state-of-the-art CMOEAs. Experimental results on five benchmarks with totally 52 instances demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. In addition, the superiority of ECMOEA is verified through comparisons to seven state-of-the-art CMOEAs. Moreover, the effectiveness of ECMOEA on the real-world problems is also evaluated for eight instances.

scholarly journals D2MOPSO: MOPSO Based on Decomposition and Dominance with Archiving Using Crowding Distance in Objective and Solution Spaces

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Al Moubayed ◽  
A. Petrovski ◽  
J. McCall
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Improved Method ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Comparison And Analysis

This paper improves a recently developed multi-objective particle swarm optimizer ([Formula: see text]) that incorporates dominance with decomposition used in the context of multi-objective optimization. Decomposition simplifies a multi-objective problem (MOP) by transforming it to a set of aggregation problems, whereas dominance plays a major role in building the leaders’ archive. [Formula: see text] introduces a new archiving technique that facilitates attaining better diversity and coverage in both objective and solution spaces. The improved method is evaluated on standard benchmarks including both constrained and unconstrained test problems, by comparing it with three state of the art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: MOEA/D, OMOPSO, and dMOPSO. The comparison and analysis of the experimental results, supported by statistical tests, indicate that the proposed algorithm is highly competitive, efficient, and applicable to a wide range of multi-objective optimization problems.

scholarly journals Improved Lebesgue Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm: Reducing Hypervolume Computations

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Saúl Zapotecas-Martínez ◽  
Abel García-Nájera ◽  
Adriana Menchaca-Méndez
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Lebesgue Measure ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

One of the major limitations of evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure for multi-objective optimization is the computational cost required to approximate the Pareto front of a problem. Nonetheless, the Pareto compliance property of the Lebesgue measure makes it one of the most investigated indicators in the designing of indicator-based evolutionary algorithms (IBEAs). The main deficiency of IBEAs that use the Lebesgue measure is their computational cost which increases with the number of objectives of the problem. On this matter, the investigation presented in this paper introduces an evolutionary algorithm based on the Lebesgue measure to deal with box-constrained continuous multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm implicitly uses the regularity property of continuous multi-objective optimization problems that has suggested effectiveness when solving continuous problems with rough Pareto sets. On the other hand, the survival selection mechanism considers the local property of the Lebesgue measure, thus reducing the computational time in our algorithmic approach. The emerging indicator-based evolutionary algorithm is examined and compared versus three state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure. In addition, we validate its performance on a set of artificial test problems with various characteristics, including multimodality, separability, and various Pareto front forms, incorporating concavity, convexity, and discontinuity. For a more exhaustive study, the proposed algorithm is evaluated in three real-world applications having four, five, and seven objective functions whose properties are unknown. We show the high competitiveness of our proposed approach, which, in many cases, improved the state-of-the-art indicator-based evolutionary algorithms on the multi-objective problems adopted in our investigation.

scholarly journals Improved SparseEA for sparse large-scale multi-objective optimization problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yajie Zhang ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Xingyi Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Limited Budget ◽  
Decision Variables ◽  
Real World Applications

AbstractSparse large-scale multi-objective optimization problems (LSMOPs) widely exist in real-world applications, which have the properties of involving a large number of decision variables and sparse Pareto optimal solutions, i.e., most decision variables of these solutions are zero. In recent years, sparse LSMOPs have attracted increasing attentions in the evolutionary computation community. However, all the recently tailored algorithms for sparse LSMOPs put the sparsity detection and maintenance in the first place, where the nonzero variables can hardly be optimized sufficiently within a limited budget of function evaluations. To address this issue, this paper proposes to enhance the connection between real variables and binary variables within the two-layer encoding scheme with the assistance of variable grouping techniques. In this way, more efforts can be devoted to the real part of nonzero variables, achieving the balance between sparsity maintenance and variable optimization. According to the experimental results on eight benchmark problems and three real-world applications, the proposed algorithm is superior over existing state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms for sparse LSMOPs.

scholarly journals A New Approach to Group Multi-Objective Optimization under Imperfect Information and Its Application to Project Portfolio Optimization

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4575
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fernández ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Claudia Gomez-Santillan
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Imperfect Information ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Project Portfolio ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Group Member

This paper addresses group multi-objective optimization under a new perspective. For each point in the feasible decision set, satisfaction or dissatisfaction from each group member is determined by a multi-criteria ordinal classification approach, based on comparing solutions with a limiting boundary between classes “unsatisfactory” and “satisfactory”. The whole group satisfaction can be maximized, finding solutions as close as possible to the ideal consensus. The group moderator is in charge of making the final decision, finding the best compromise between the collective satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Imperfect information on values of objective functions, required and available resources, and decision model parameters are handled by using interval numbers. Two different kinds of multi-criteria decision models are considered: (i) an interval outranking approach and (ii) an interval weighted-sum value function. The proposal is more general than other approaches to group multi-objective optimization since (a) some (even all) objective values may be not the same for different DMs; (b) each group member may consider their own set of objective functions and constraints; (c) objective values may be imprecise or uncertain; (d) imperfect information on resources availability and requirements may be handled; (e) each group member may have their own perception about the availability of resources and the requirement of resources per activity. An important application of the new approach is collective multi-objective project portfolio optimization. This is illustrated by solving a real size group many-objective project portfolio optimization problem using evolutionary computation tools.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document