scholarly journals Adverse Psychosocial Work Environments and Depression–A Narrative Review of Selected Theoretical Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Siegrist ◽  
Natalia Wege
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junling Gao ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Denglai Yu ◽  
Junming Dai ◽  
Yongkai Zhu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alqahtani Ibtesam Mohammed

Worldwide, occupational stress among care professionals, nurses in particular, is a major concern in health care systems. Work stress in nursing is linked to high rates of job dissatisfaction, burnout, absenteeism, turnover, and stress-related illness, thus placing job performance among nurses’ and patients’ lives at risk. The purpose of this integrative review is to explore the concepts of occupational stress among nurses. Three main theoretical models are included to illustrate different viewpoints of occupational stress. Meta-analysis of the basic literature and the results of previous research are used. Findings from studies have shown that evaluations of nursing work environments reflect a strong link with burnout. The excessive workload of nursing professionals, complexity of patient care activities, poor organized work environments, and lack of leaders’ support are considered as contributing factor to the job stress which has resulted in providing unsafe care. The findings highlight that nurses frequently experience occupational stress due to the nature of the nursing profession. Thus, it is critical to implement effective organizational interventions to minimize work-related stressors and work performance of nurses. It is significant to have supportive working environments that encourage collaboration and empower nurses to provide excellent care and reduce work-related stressors.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e025948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline S Duchaine ◽  
Mahee Gilbert-Ouimet ◽  
Karine Aubé ◽  
Michel Vezina ◽  
Ruth Ndjaboue ◽  
...  

IntroductionMental health problems (MHPs) are frequent and disabling and are the first or second leading cause of certified sickness absences from work in industrialised countries. They are generally long lasting and generate a considerable human and socioeconomic burden. The deleterious effect of adverse psychosocial work factors on MHP has been documented. However, the evidence regarding the effect of these factors on absences from work for an MHP has not been synthesised since 2007. The proposed systematic review aims to synthesise the effect of adverse psychosocial work factors from three validated theoretical models (the demand–control–support, effort–reward–imbalance and organisational justice models) on the risk of certified absences from work for diagnosed MHP among workers.Method and analysisA systematic search strategy will be conducted in seven databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, a multistep screening process by independent reviewers will lead to study selection. The search strategy was first run in 16 January 2017 and will be updated in October 2018. Only quantitative, prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the validated theoretical models on certified absence from work for a diagnosed MHP will be considered for inclusion. Extracted data will be used for quantitative and qualitative evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided for high-quality studies and by each psychosocial work factor, after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationAs this study will be based only on published studies, ethics approval is not required. Given that psychosocial works factors are frequent and modifiable, the results of this systematic review may provide evidence to support prevention strategies that can help to reduce the human social and economic burden associated with medically certified absences from work for an MHP.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091632.


1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Hall

This study investigates the relative distribution of home responsibilities and psychosocial work environment characteristics and their associations with psychosomatic strain in a random sample of the female and male working population of Sweden (N = 12,772). Occupational variables investigated were psychological and physical demands, job control, social support, and job hazards. Home characteristics included measures of household work, number and age of children, and child care resources. A sex-pooled logistic regression analysis was performed to detect sex differences in the effects of the variables upon strain. Gender was no longer associated with psychosomatic strain after adjusting for work and home characteristics and their interactions, and while there were some similarities between the sexes with respect to the main effects of the home and work characteristics, in 52 of 60 combined effect comparisons women had a greater combined odds ratio for strain than men.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e033093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline S Duchaine ◽  
Karine Aubé ◽  
Mahee Gilbert-Ouimet ◽  
Ana Paula Bruno Pena Gralle ◽  
Michel Vezina ◽  
...  

IntroductionDepression is a common and disabling health problem that contributes to an important social and economic burden, particularly among the working age population. The deleterious effect of psychosocial work factors on depression has been documented. However, the most recent systematic reviews had restrictive eligibility criteria and, since their publications, several original studies have been published. The proposed systematic review aims to update, evaluate and synthesise the effect of psychosocial work factors from three recognised theoretical models, the demand-control-support, effort-reward imbalance and organisational justice models, on the risk of depression among workers.Method and analysisA systematic literature search will be conducted in seven academic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS) as well as three grey literature databases. The search strategy was first run on January 2017, updated in October 2017 and will be updated 6 months prior to submission for publication. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, study selection will be carried out using a rigorous multistep screening process in duplicate by independent reviewers. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the three theoretical models on depression or antidepressant medication use among working adults will be included. Extracted data will be used for evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided after considering homogeneity and number of studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will only draw from published studies and grey literature available in electronic databases; ethics approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in a peer review journal and presented at relevant conferences. Given that psychosocial work factors are frequent and modifiable, the results can help reduce the social and economic burden of depression and support public policy-makers to improve occupational health standards.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018107666


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document