scholarly journals Age and Gender Differences in Facial Attractiveness, but Not Emotion Resemblance, Contribute to Age and Gender Stereotypes

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Palumbo ◽  
Reginald B. Adams ◽  
Ursula Hess ◽  
Robert E. Kleck ◽  
Leslie Zebrowitz
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Gender Stereotypes ◽  
Facial Attractiveness ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
And Gender

scholarly journals Math and language gender stereotypes: Age and gender differences in implicit biases and explicit beliefs

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0238230
Author(s):  
Heidi A. Vuletich ◽  
Beth Kurtz-Costes ◽  
Erin Cooley ◽  
B. Keith Payne
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Gender Stereotypes ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Implicit Biases ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
And Gender

scholarly journals Exploiting the Molecular Basis of Age and Gender Differences in Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Mercatelli ◽  
Elisabetta Pedace ◽  
Pierangelo Veltri ◽  
Federico M. Giorgi ◽  
Pietro Hiram Guzzi
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
And Gender

Do They Really Mean It? Children’s Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-712
Author(s):  
K. Rothermich ◽  
O. Caivano ◽  
L.J. Knoll ◽  
V. Talwar
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Video Clip ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Video Clips ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
Speaker Intentions ◽  
And Gender

Interpreting other people’s intentions during communication represents a remarkable challenge for children. Although many studies have examined children’s understanding of, for example, sarcasm, less is known about their interpretation. Using realistic audiovisual scenes, we invited 124 children between 8 and 12 years old to watch video clips of young adults using different speaker intentions. After watching each video clip, children answered questions about the characters and their beliefs, and the perceived friendliness of the speaker. Children’s responses reveal age and gender differences in the ability to interpret speaker belief and social intentions, especially for scenarios conveying teasing and prosocial lies. We found that the ability to infer speaker belief of prosocial lies and to interpret social intentions increases with age. Our results suggest that children at the age of 8 years already show adult-like abilities to understand literal statements, whereas the ability to infer specific social intentions, such as teasing and prosocial lies, is still developing between the age of 8 and 12 years. Moreover, girls performed better in classifying prosocial lies and sarcasm as insincere than boys. The outcomes expand our understanding of how children observe speaker intentions and suggest further research into the development of teasing and prosocial lie interpretation.

scholarly journals Age and gender differences in excitation-contraction coupling of the rat ventricle

1998 ◽  
Vol 511 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Normand Leblanc ◽  
Denis Chartier ◽  
Hugues Gosselin ◽  
Jean-Lucien Rouleau
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Excitation Contraction Coupling ◽  
Contraction Coupling ◽  
Age And Gender Differences ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Rat Ventricle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document