scholarly journals Physiological and Performance Impacts After Field Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training With Different Work-Recovery Duration

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Henrique Albuquerque Brandão ◽  
Thaysa Passos Nery Chagas ◽  
Alan Bruno Silva Vasconcelos ◽  
Vivian Conceição de Oliveira ◽  
Leonardo de Sousa Fortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Recovery Duration ◽  
Work Recovery ◽  
And Performance ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals Supplements and Nutritional Interventions to Augment High-Intensity Interval Training Physiological and Performance Adaptations—A Narrative Review

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott C. Forbes ◽  
Darren G. Candow ◽  
Abbie E. Smith-Ryan ◽  
Katie R. Hirsch ◽  
Michael D. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Beta Alanine ◽  
And Performance ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Nutritional Strategies

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) involves short bursts of intense activity interspersed by periods of low-intensity exercise or rest. HIIT is a viable alternative to traditional continuous moderate-intensity endurance training to enhance maximal oxygen uptake and endurance performance. Combining nutritional strategies with HIIT may result in more favorable outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight key dietary interventions that may augment adaptations to HIIT, including creatine monohydrate, caffeine, nitrate, sodium bicarbonate, beta-alanine, protein, and essential amino acids, as well as manipulating carbohydrate availability. Nutrient timing and potential sex differences are also discussed. Overall, sodium bicarbonate and nitrates show promise for enhancing HIIT adaptations and performance. Beta-alanine has the potential to increase training volume and intensity and improve HIIT adaptations. Caffeine and creatine have potential benefits, however, longer-term studies are lacking. Presently, there is a lack of evidence supporting high protein diets to augment HIIT. Low carbohydrate training enhances the upregulation of mitochondrial enzymes, however, there does not seem to be a performance advantage, and a periodized approach may be warranted. Lastly, potential sex differences suggest the need for future research to examine sex-specific nutritional strategies in response to HIIT.

Physiological and performance responses to high-intensity interval training in female inline speed skaters

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (196) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Fereshtian ◽  
Mohsen Sheykhlouvand ◽  
Scott Forbes ◽  
Hamid Agha-Alinejad ◽  
Mohammadali Gharaat
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
And Performance ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals The Investigation of the Physical and Performance Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HITT) on Sedentary University Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Ali Erdem Cigerci ◽  
Harun Genc
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Performance Characteristics ◽  
Performance Parameters ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
And Performance ◽  
High Intensity Interval

The aim of this study was to examine the physical and selected performance characteristics of 9-week High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on sedentary university students. Participants were separated two groups as HIIT and control group (CG). HIIT group applied training 3 times a week for 9 weeks. CG was not applied any training. Before and after HIIT training program, the subjects were applied to age, height, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI) tests for physical parameters and standing long jump (SLJ), vertical jump (VJ), 10-20 m sprint, T agility test (TAT), star excursion balance test (SEBT), running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST) for performance parameters. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze of inter-group, intra group and the effect of training in repeated measurements. Bonferroni test was used for Post Hoc comparisons; the significance level was accepted as 0.05. There was a significant difference in BW, BMI and all performance parameters in favor of HIIT group. HIIT provided effective development to physical and performance characteristics of university students.

scholarly journals The Moderating Role of Recovery Durations in High-Intensity Interval-Training Protocols

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 859-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick P.J.M. Schoenmakers ◽  
Florentina J. Hettinga ◽  
Kate E. Reed
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Training Adaptations ◽  
Recovery Duration ◽  
Acute Responses ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Moderating Role

Purpose:Over recent years, multiple studies have tried to optimize the exercise intensity and duration of work intervals in high-intensity-interval training (HIIT) protocols. Although an optimal work interval is of major importance to facilitate training adaptations, an optimal HIIT protocol can only be achieved with an adequate recovery interval separating work bouts. Surprisingly, little research has focused on the acute responses and long-term impact of manipulating recovery intervals in HIIT sessions. This invited commentary therefore aimed to review and discuss the current literature and increase the understanding of the moderating role of recovery durations in HIIT protocols.Conclusion:The acute responses to manipulations in recovery durations in repeated-sprint training (RST), sprint interval training (SIT), and aerobic interval training (AIT) protocols have recently begun to receive scientific interest. However, limited studies have manipulated only the recovery duration in RST, SIT, or AIT protocols to analyze the role of recovery durations on long-term training adaptations. In RST and SIT, longer recovery intervals (≥80 s) facilitate higher workloads in subsequent work intervals (compared with short recovery intervals), while potentially lowering the aerobic stimulus of the training session. In AIT, the total physiological strain endured per training protocol appears not to be moderated by the recovery intervals, unless the recovery duration is too short. This invited commentary highlights that further empirical evidence on a variety of RST, SIT, and AIT protocols and in exercise modalities other than cycling is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document