scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Risk Stratification of SCN5A With Brugada Syndrome: Is SCN5A Always a Marker of Low Risk?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihan Yang ◽  
Dan Hu ◽  
Frederic Sacher ◽  
Kengo F. Kusano ◽  
Xinye Li ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Laureano-Phillips ◽  
Richard D. Robinson ◽  
Subhash Aryal ◽  
Somer Blair ◽  
Damalia Wilson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Tse ◽  
Mengqi Gong ◽  
Christien Ka Hou Li ◽  
Keith Sai Kit Leung ◽  
Stamatis Georgopoulos ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Takagi ◽  
Yasuhiro Yokoyama ◽  
Kazutaka Aonuma ◽  
Naohiko Aihara ◽  
Masayasu Hiraoka

Background Neither the clinical characteristics nor risk stratification of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome have been clearly determined. We compared clinical and ECG characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome to identify new markers for distinguishing high- from low-risk patients. Methods A total of 216 consecutive individuals with Brugada syndrome (mean age 52±14 years, 197 males) were enrolled in the Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study (J-IVFS). Clinical and ECG characteristics were compared among 3 groups of patients: VF group; patients with aborted sudden death and documented VF (N=34), Syncope (Sy) group; patients with syncope without documented VF (N=70), and Asymptomatic (As) group; subjects without symptoms (N=112). Comparisons were made among the 3 groups as well as between the symptomatic (VF/Sy) and asymptomatic (As) groups. Short-term prognosis was also compared among the 3 groups, and between the VF/Sy and As groups. Results 1) Clinical characteristics: incidence of past history of AF was significantly higher in the VF and Sy groups than in the AS group (26, 26, and 12 %, respectively; [p=0.04]), though no other clinical parameters differed among the groups. 2) On resting 12-lead ECG, r-J interval (interval from QRS onset to J point) in lead V2 and QRS duration in lead V6 were highest in the VF group (104, 98, and 92 msec in V2 [p<0.001]; 106, 103, and 94 msec in V6 [p<0.0001], respectively, VF vs. Sy vs. As). 3) Positive late potential and inducibility of VF by EPS did not differ in incidence among the 3 groups. 4) Clinical follow-up: during a mean follow-up of 36±16 months, incidence of cardiac events (sudden death and/or VF) was higher in the VF/Sy groups than in the As group (29, 8, and 0 %, respectively [p<0.001]). Multivariate analysis showed that the frequencies of r-J interval ≥ 90 msec in lead V2 and QRS duration ≥ 90 msec in lead V6 were significantly higher in patients with cardiac events (p=0.02, 0.02, respectively). Conclusions In symptomatic patients, prolonged ventricular depolarization in precordial leads of the ECG was prominent in the VF group, and this sign can be used to distinguish high- from low-risk patients with Brugada syndrome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tian ◽  
Na An ◽  
Mengchen Yuan ◽  
Liqin Wang ◽  
Hanlai Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: Guidelines have previously suggested that atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic death in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients. However, only two articles consisting of 17 AF patients with BrS supported these views. The risk stratification of BrS patients with AF remains controversial. Thus, a meta-analysis is used to estimate the risk stratification of BrS patients with AF. Methods: We searched for relevant studies published from 2000 to December 30, 2018. A total of 1712 patients with BrS from five studies were included: 200 patients (12%) were reported with AF, among whom 37 patients (19%) had arrhythmic events. Results: BrS patients with AF in all studies (OR 1.92, 95% CI:0.91to 4.04, P =0.09; Heterogeneity: P = 0.03, I2=61%) and some European studies (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.18 to 6.94, P=0.91; Heterogeneity: P = 0.006, I2=80%) did not display a higher risk of arrhythmic events than those without AF, but BrS patients with AF in Japanese studies (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.93, P=0.002; Heterogeneity: P = 0.40, I2=0%) had a higher risk of arrhythmic events than those without AF. The proportion of BrS patients with AF was greater in Japanese studies than in some European studies (16% vs. 9%, P<0.001). Conclusions: On the whole, BrS patients with AF showed no higher risk of arrhythmic events than those without AF, but BrS patients with AF in Japan had a higher risk of arrhythmic events than those without AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document