scholarly journals The Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry London Meeting 2018: Brexit and Other Challenges in Early Phase Drug Development

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Reijntjes ◽  
Muna Albayaty ◽  
James Bush ◽  
Joseph Cheriyan ◽  
Anthea Cromie ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzadgai Khan ◽  
Muna Albayaty ◽  
James Bush ◽  
Joseph Cheriyan ◽  
Anthea Cromie ◽  
...  

The Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry (AHPPI) annual meeting focused on impending change, innovation, and future challenges facing early phase drug development as we move into the second decade of the 21th century. The meeting opened with discussion around the technical revolution in pharmaceutical medicine over the 4 decades since the AHPPI was founded and how transformative technologies have accompanied the introduction of processes such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. During the meeting examples were presented of how in terms of the development of new therapies, the classic phases of clinical drug development are becoming a thing of the past and the lines between the phases have begun to blur, particularly in the field of oncology. The contribution that monoclonal antibodies have made to medicine and the next chapter in their design and use was also discussed. A representative of the UK’s Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency discussed the increasing numbers of requests to approve complex innovative design trials, how novel trial designs are impacting on the traditional linear “phase” approach to drug development and the common pitfalls associated with them. Guidance was provided from a regulator’s viewpoint on what was meant by the term “novel design” and how to submit successful trial applications for such complex trials. In an Oxford-style debate, the audience discussed the motion that “there is no longer a need to include placebo subjects in early clinical trials.” The keynote speaker focused on delivering change in complex environments such as the field of drug development. The afternoon session included presentations on the challenges associated with drug product design, the complexities within non-oral dosage forms and proposed new methods of formulations for drug delivery. Presentations were also given on advances in mechanistic and computational pharmacokinetic modeling and how they have proved to be valuable tools to rationalize and facilitate the process of drug development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarkko Kalliomäki ◽  
Frank Miller ◽  
Matts Kågedal ◽  
Rolf Karlsten

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Zhu

Psychiatric diseases have the lowest probability of success in clinical drug development. This presents not only an issue to address the unmet medical needs of patients, but also a hurdle for pharmaceutical and biotech industry to continue R&D in this disease area. Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles provide an understanding of the drug exposure, target binding and pharmacological activity at the target site of action for a new drug candidate. Collectively, these principles determine the likelihood of testing the mechanism of action and enhancing the likelihood of candidate survival in Phase 2 clinical development, therefore, they are termed as the “three pillars of survival.” Human Phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies provide evidence of the three pillars. Electroencephalogram (EEG) assessments and cognitive function tests in schizophrenia patients can provide proof of pharmacology and ensure that a pharmacological active regimen will be tested in Phase 2 proof of concept (POC) studies for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS).


Bioanalysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Davis ◽  
Joel Usansky ◽  
Shibani Mitra-Kaushik ◽  
John Kellie ◽  
Kimberly Honrine ◽  
...  

Challenges for data storage during drug development have become increasingly complex as the pharmaceutical industry expands in an environment that requires on-demand availability of data and resources for users across the globe. While the efficiency and relative low cost of cloud services have become increasingly attractive, hesitancy toward the use of cloud services has decreased and there has been a significant shift toward real-world implementation. Within GxP laboratories, the considerations for cloud storage of data include data integrity and security, as well as access control and usage for users around the globe. In this review, challenges and considerations when using cloud storage options for the storage of laboratory-based GxP data are discussed and best practices are defined.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-586
Author(s):  
Anita Rao

Do pharmaceutical firms respond to the actions of their competitors in R&D, and if so, what implications does this have for policies aimed at incentivizing drug development?


2019 ◽  
pp. 216847901882108
Author(s):  
Simon Coates ◽  
Oliver Pohl ◽  
Jean-Pierre Gotteland ◽  
Jörg Täubel ◽  
Ulrike Lorch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document