scholarly journals Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Xinmailong Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Lu ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Jiabo Wang ◽  
Honghong Liu ◽  
Haotian Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 15 randomised controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2019-137342
Author(s):  
Junyi Zhang ◽  
Shengda Hu ◽  
Yufeng Jiang ◽  
Yafeng Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Iron Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
6Mwt Distance ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Trials studying iron administration in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and iron deficiency (ID) have sprung up these years but the results remain inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of iron therapy in patients with CHF and ID. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, OVID and Web of Science up to 31 July 2019 to search for randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing iron therapy with placebo in CHF with ID, regardless of presence of anaemia. Published studies reporting data of any of the following outcomes were included: all-cause death, cardiovascular hospitalisation, adverse events, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, peak oxygen consumption, 6 min walking test (6MWT) distance and quality of life (QoL) parameters. 15 RCTs with a total of 1627 patients (911 in iron therapy and 716 in control) were included. Iron therapy was demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalisation (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.99, p=0.049), but was ineffective in reducing all-cause death (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.06, p=0.078) or cardiovascular death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.63, p=0.540). Iron therapy resulted in a reduction in NYHA class (mean difference (MD) −0.73, 95% CI −0.99 to −0.47, p<0.001), an increase in LVEF (MD +4.35, 95% CI 0.69 to 8.00, p=0.020), 6MWT distance (MD +35.44, 95% CI 11.55 to 59.33, p=0.004) and an improvement in QoL: EQ-5D score (MD +4.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.31, p=0.014); Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MD −19.47, 95% CI −23.36 to −15.59, p<0.001) and Patients Global Assessment (PGA) scale (MD 0.71, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.10, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in adverse events or serious adverse events between iron treatment group and control group. Iron therapy reduces cardiovascular hospitalisation in patients with CHF with ID, and additionally improves cardiac function, exercise capacity and QoL in patients with CHF with ID and anaemia, without an increase of adverse events.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Shengmai Injection for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yanping Wang ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Xiaofan Chen ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Weifeng Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Shengmai Injection ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Shengmai injection (SMI) is made from purified ginseng, Radix Ophiopogonis, and Schisandra chinensis. It has cardiotonic effects and is clinically used for the adjuvant treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, its efficacy and safety are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the existing efficacy and safety evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied SMI for the treatment of CHF. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched up to September 10, 2019. RCTs that compared basic Western medicine treatment with SMI + basic Western medicine were included. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the RCTs. The meta-analysis used the random effects model; the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined using the inverse variance method, and the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to combine the relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Q tests, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by analyzing three preset subgroup hypotheses. Results. A total of 20 RCTs were included (n = 1562), with a moderate-to-high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with Western medicine alone, SMI adjuvant therapy significantly improved cardiac function indicators, including left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 6.8%, 95% CI 4.68 to 8.91), stroke volume (MD 9.81 ml, 95% CI 5.67 to 13.96), cardiac output (MD 0.96 L/min, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25), and cardiac index (MD 0.53 L/min, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.70); heterogeneity was generally high among these outcomes. Compared with the controls, patients receiving SMI adjuvant therapy also had a higher response to treatment (RR 2.89, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.99; I2 = 0%), a greater decrease in brain natriuretic peptide levels (MD −284.66 ng/l, 95% CI −353.73 to −215.59, I2 = 0%), and a greater increase in six‐minute walk test performance (MD 70.67 m, 95% CI 22.92 to 118.42; I2 = 84%). Nine studies reported mild adverse events, such as gastrointestinal reactions, and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Currently, available evidence indicates that SMI, as an adjuvant for basic Western medicine treatment, can improve the cardiac function of patients with CHF with good safety outcomes. Because of the high risk of bias among the included RCTs and the large heterogeneity of partial outcomes, the findings of this study must be verified by high-quality studies with large sample sizes.

scholarly journals Clinical efficacy and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng injection for the treatment of chronic heart failure

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (52) ◽  
pp. e18556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan Wang ◽  
Dongfeng Yao ◽  
Pan Zhang ◽  
Xiaowei Xie ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Shenqi Fuzheng Injection

scholarly journals Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pill Combined with Conventional Western Medicine in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Lisheng Chen ◽  
Ruilin Wang ◽  
Honghong Liu ◽  
Shizhang Wei ◽  
Manyi Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library

Objective. The systematic review was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical efficacy of Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine in treating CHF were widely searched in electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, Read-show database, VIP database, and WanFang up to December 26, 2020. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed according to the Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 5.0. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. Results. Twenty-one RCTs (N = 2162) that met the criteria were included in the review for the assessment of methodological quality. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the conventional Western medicine (control group), Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine (experience group) significantly improved clinical efficiency, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide level (BNP), 6 min-walk distance (6-MWD), and adverse reactions. Conclusion. Qishen Yiqi dropping pill combined with conventional Western medicine are better than conventional Western medicine alone to improve the indicators of patients with CHF, which provides a certain basis for the treatment of CHF.

scholarly journals Clinical efficacy and safety of nuanxin capsule for chronic heart failure

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (27) ◽  
pp. e11339
Author(s):  
Ziqing Li ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Tie Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document