scholarly journals The Combination of Rituximab and Bendamustine as First-Line Treatment Is Highly Effective in the Eradicating Minimal Residual Disease in Follicular Lymphoma: An Italian Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Galimberti ◽  
Elena Ciabatti ◽  
Giacomo Ercolano ◽  
Susanna Grassi ◽  
Francesca Guerrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
First Line Treatment

Alemtuzumab Compared With Chlorambucil As First-Line Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (35) ◽  
pp. 5616-5623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
Aleksander B. Skotnicki ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Branimir Jaksic ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Alternative Treatment ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients and Methods Patients received alemtuzumab (30 mg three times per week, for up to 12 weeks) or chlorambucil (40 mg/m2 every 28 days, for up to 12 months). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), time to alternative therapy, safety, and overall survival. Results We randomly assigned 297 patients, 149 to alemtuzumab and 148 to chlorambucil. Alemtuzumab had superior PFS, with a 42% reduction in risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; P = .0001), and a median time to alternative treatment of 23.3 versus 14.7 months for chlorambucil (HR = 0.54; P = .0001). The ORR was 83% with alemtuzumab (24% CR) versus 55% with chlorambucil (2% CR); differences in ORR and CR were highly statistically significant (P < .0001). Elimination of minimal residual disease occurred in 11 of 36 complete responders to alemtuzumab versus none to chlorambucil. Adverse events profiles were similar, except for more infusion-related and cytomegalovirus (CMV) events with alemtuzumab and more nausea and vomiting with chlorambucil. CMV events had no apparent impact on efficacy. Conclusion As first-line treatment for patients with CLL, alemtuzumab demonstrated significantly improved PFS, time to alternative treatment, ORR and CR, and minimal residual disease–negative remissions compared with chlorambucil, with predictable and manageable toxicity.

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status in FCR-Treated CLL Patients at the End of Treatment Influences Progression Free Survival (PFS), Results of the Ctrial-IE (ICORG) 07-01/ CLL Ireland Study, with Mutational Analysis Providing Additional Insight

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3237-3237
Author(s):  
Niamh Appleby ◽  
Fiona M Quinn ◽  
David O'Brien ◽  
Smyth Liam ◽  
Johanna Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) therapy results in a complete remission (CR) rate of 72% and a median progression free survival (PFS) of 80 months in non-del (17P) CLL1. Achieving an MRD negative (MRD-ve) CR after completing therapy is an early surrogate marker for overall survival (OS) and PFS2. Specific genetic CLL subtypes determined by fluorescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis, immunoglobulin mutation IgVH, NOTCH1 and SF3B1 status determine response to chemotherapy3,4. We completed a multi-centre prospective study between 2008 and 2012, with a median follow up of 62.6 months using MRD status to determine length of therapy. Patients who achieved an MRD-veCR after 4 courses of FCR received no further therapy and the remaining patients completed 6 cycles of FCR. MRD status was tracked 6 monthly in patients who became MRD-veuntil MRD was detected. The genetic subtype was also analysed but did not influence treatment. Fifty-two patients {35M;17F, median age 61years (range 37-73)} were enrolled. Forty-six patients completed the MRD assessment after 4 cycles. Eleven patients discontinued assigned FCR therapy for the following reasons: prolonged cytopenia (4); non-compliance (1); autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (2); renal impairment (1); pleural effusion (1); not recorded (2). Eighteen (34.6%) patients achieved an MRD-veCR after 4 cycles and a further11 after 6cycles resulting in 29/52 (55.8%) MRD-veCRs in total. The median PFS was 72.3 months (95% Confidence Interval 61.3-84.1 months) and the median OS has not been reached. Patients who attained an MRD-veversusMRD+vestatus had a prolonged PFS (81.1 vs 46.2 months, p<0.0002). No difference in PFS was observed between patients reaching an MRD-veCR after 4 versus 6 cycles (median PFS81.1 vs 84.1 months,p=0.29). FISH results were available for 48 patients; del(13q) in 16/48 (33%), del(11q) in 15/48 (31%) no abnormality in 12/48 (25%), trisomy 12 in 4 (8%) and other abnormality in 1 patient. The IgVH status was unfavourable in 34/52 (65%), SF3B1 mutations were detected in 5/51 (9.8%) and NOTCH1 mutations in 10/52(19.2%) patients respectively, comparable to published studies of first-line treatment in CLL3,4. The median PFS for patients with good risk IgVH was not reached. Del(11q) did not impact on PFS (median PFS 66.5 vs 78.9 months, p=0.7301). SF3B1 and NOTCH1 mutated patients had a shortened PFS (median PFS 38.4 vs 71.1 months, p=0.038 and median PFS 62.4 vs 82.2 months p=0.0302, respectively). In conclusion abbreviated FCR therapy is effective for patients achieving MRD-veremission after 4 cycles. SF3B1 and NOTCH1 mutated patients had a short PFS and may benefit from alternative first-line treatment. This finding emphasizes the role mutational profiling will play in optimising and personalising therapy in CLL in the future. Reference: Tam C, O'Brien S, WierdaW, et al. “Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia” Blood 2008 Aug 15;112(4):975-80 Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Fischer K, et al. "Minimal Residual Disease Quantification is an Independent Predictor of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Multivariate Analysis From the Randomized GCLLSG CLL8 Trial" J Clin Onc 2012 Mar 20; 30(9):980-8. StilgenbauerS,SchnaiterA,PaschkaP, et al. "Gene mutations and treatment outcome in chronic lymphocyticleukemia: results from the CLL8 trial" Blood 2014 May 22;123(21):3247-54 Chiaretti S, Marinelli M, Del Giudice I, et al."NOTCH1, SF3B1, BIRC3 and TP53 mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia undergoing first-line treatment: correlation with biological parameters and response to treatment"LeukLymphoma 2014 Dec; 55(12):2785-92 Figure 1 Patient outcomes by MRD status in ICORG 07-01 Trial Figure 1. Patient outcomes by MRD status in ICORG 07-01 Trial Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Crotty: BMS, Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Roche: Honoraria. O'Dwyer:Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bendamustine plus Rituximab Versus R‐CHOP as First‐Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3A: Evidence from a Multicenter, Retrospective Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Mondello ◽  
Normann Steiner ◽  
Wolfgang Willenbacher ◽  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Colchicine as an Alternative First-Line Treatment of Sclerosing Mesenteritis: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Cortés ◽  
Hassan M. Ghoz ◽  
Obaie Mzaik ◽  
Muhamad Alhaj Moustafa ◽  
Yan Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Sclerosing Mesenteritis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

scholarly journals SYSTEMIC FRONT LINE THERAPY OF FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: WHEN, TO WHOM AND HOW

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e2016062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pavanello ◽  
Sara Steffanoni ◽  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Emanuele Zucca
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role for the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document