scholarly journals Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Surov ◽  
Hans Jonas Meyer ◽  
Andreas Wienke
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Head And Neck Region ◽  
Apparent Diffusion

scholarly journals Early detection treatment response for head and neck carcinomas using intravoxel incoherent motion-magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 20190507
Author(s):  
Qingxu Song ◽  
Fang Li ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Jianbo Wang ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion ◽  
Perfusion Fraction ◽  
Apparent Diffusion ◽  
Pre Treatment

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion-MRI (IVIM-MRI) for predicting the treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify original articles on diagnostic performance of IVIM in predicting treatment response in HNSCC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. The IVIM parameters studied were diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were obtained by using a random-effects model. Of 65 studies screened, 8 studies with 347 patients were finally included. Results: The pooled sensitivities and specificities were 76% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69–82%] and 81% (95% CI 70–89%) for pre-treatment D, and 70% (95% CI 58–80%) and 82% (95% CI 66–92%) for △D, respectively. In addition, the sensitivities and specificities ranged from 41.7 to 94% and 67 to 100% for pre-treatment f, and from 55.7 to 76.5% and 72.2 to 93.3% for pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient, respectively. Conclusions: The diffusion-related coefficients pre-treatment D and △D demonstrated good accuracy in predicting early treatment response in HNSCC patients. However, because of the variability in reference test and other limitations of included literature, further investigation is needed before implementing any IVIM strategy into clinical practice.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Strategies for Untreated Capillary Malformations of the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonca Cinkara ◽  
Ginger Beau Langbroek ◽  
Chantal M. A. M. van der Horst ◽  
Albert Wolkerstorfer ◽  
Sophie E. R. Horbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Head And Neck Region ◽  
Meta Analyses

scholarly journals Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating between benign and malignant hepatic focal lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Abugamra ◽  
Aya Yassin ◽  
Asmaa Saber Mostafa Abdel-Rehim ◽  
Dina Sayed Sheha
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Focal Lesion ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Apparent Diffusion ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of diffusion weight MRI (DWI) in the characterization of hepatic focal lesions by using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty patients (18 women, 12 men; mean age 48.5 years) with hepatic focal lesions were included in this study. Patients underwent DW MR imaging with the SPLICE sequence. ADC of each focal lesion carcinoma was calculated from DW MR Images obtained with low and high b values. ADCs were compared among pathological types of focal lesions. Results Among the 30 patients included in the study, 46 focal lesions were detected. Twenty-four lesions were metastatic lesions from primary cancer, 7 lesions were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 9 lesions were hemangiomas, and 6 lesions were simple cysts. There was highly significant difference between the mean ADC of the malignant lesions (metastasis and HCC) and the mean ADC of benign lesions (hemangiomas and cysts). The ADC of malignant lesion was much less than that of benign lesion. The mean ADC of malignant lesions (n = 31) was 0.73 ± 0.19 × 10−3 mm2/s, and the mean ADC of benign lesions (n = 15) was 1.94 ± 0.68 × 10−3 mm2/s (p value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the cysts and hemangiomas. There was no statistically significant difference between the metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion ADCs values were able to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. ADC should be considered in the work up of patients with hepatic focal lesions.

scholarly journals Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Surov ◽  
Hans-Jonas Meyer ◽  
Maciej Pech ◽  
Maciej Powerski ◽  
Jasan Omari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adc Value ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Apparent Diffusion ◽  
Adc Values

Abstract Background Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. Methods MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. Results ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10−3 mm2/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). Conclusion No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document