scholarly journals Corrigendum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry E. Humes ◽  
Gary R. Kidd ◽  
Jennifer J. Lentz
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Factors ◽  
Speech Understanding

scholarly journals The Contribution of Cognitive Factors to Individual Differences in Understanding Noise-Vocoded Speech in Young and Older Adults

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Rosemann ◽  
Carsten Gießing ◽  
Jale Özyurt ◽  
Rebecca Carroll ◽  
Sebastian Puschmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Factors ◽  
Vocoded Speech

Understanding the Speech-Understanding Problems of Older Adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry E. Humes
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Cognitive Factors ◽  
Speech Understanding ◽  
Reported Data

Purpose The purpose of this article was to review recent research from our laboratory on the speech-understanding problems of older adults. Method The method involved a narrative review of previously reported data from our laboratory. Conclusion To date, the results from most of our studies have indicated that peripheral and cognitive factors are the primary contributors to the speech-understanding problems of older adults, with the relative mix of these 2 factors changing for unaided (primarily peripheral) and aided (primarily cognitive) listening conditions.

The Contributions of Audibility and Cognitive Factors to the Benefit Provided by Amplified Speech to Older Adults

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (07) ◽  
pp. 590-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry E. Humes
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Factors ◽  
Speech Understanding ◽  
Indiana University ◽  
Sensation Level ◽  
Speech Stimuli ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The Third ◽  
Basic Approaches

In this review of recent studies from our laboratory at Indiana University, it is argued that audibility is the primary contributor to the speech-understanding difficulties of older adults in unaided listening, but that other factors, especially cognitive factors, emerge when the role of audibility has been minimized. The advantages and disadvantages of three basic approaches used in our laboratory to minimize the role of audibility are examined. The first of these made use of clinical fits of personal amplification devices, but generally failed to make the aided speech stimuli sufficiently audible for the listeners. As a result, hearing loss remained the predominant predictor of performance. The second approach made use of raised and spectrally shaped stimuli with identical shaping applied for all listeners. The third approach used spectrally shaped speech that ensured audibility (at least 10 dB sensation level) of the stimuli up to at least 4000 Hz for each individual listener. With few exceptions, the importance of cognitive factors was revealed once the speech stimuli were made sufficiently audible. En esta revisión de estudios recientes de nuestro laboratorio en la Universidad de Indiana, se argumenta que la audibilidad es el factor primario que contribuye en las dificultades para el entendimiento del lenguaje en adultos mayores, bajo condiciones no amplificadas de escucha, pero que existen otros factores, especialmente cognitivos, que emergen cuando el papel de la audibilidad ha sido minimizado. Se examinan las ventajas y desventajas de los tres enfoques básicos utilizados en nuestro laboratorio para minimizar el papel de la audibilidad. El primero de estos hace uso de los ajustes clínicos en dispositivos personales de amplificación, pero que fallaron en convertir los estímulos amplificados de lenguaje en algo suficientemente audible para el sujeto. Como resultado, la hipoacusia continuó siendo el factor de predicción predominante en el desempeño. El segundo enfoque hizo uso de estímulos aumentados y moldeados espectralmente, con un moldeado idéntico para todos los sujetos. El tercer enfoque utilizó lenguaje moldeado espectralmente que aseguraba la audibilidad del estímulo (al menos a 10 dB de nivel de sensación) hasta al menos 4000 Hz para cada sujeto individual. Con pocas excepciones, la importancia de los factores cognitivos se reveló una vez que los estímulos de lenguaje habían sido hechos suficientemente audibles.

Individual differences in executive functions and retrieval efficacy in older adults.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1105-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fergus I. M. Craik ◽  
Eldar Eftekhari ◽  
Ellen Bialystok ◽  
Nicole D. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Executive Functions

scholarly journals Older Adults’ Adherence to Technology-Based Intervention: The Role of Messaging and Individual Differences

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 555-555
Author(s):  
Walter Boot ◽  
Nelson Roque ◽  
Erin Harrell ◽  
Neil Charness
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Health Behaviors ◽  
Individual Difference ◽  
Cognitive Training ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Message Framing ◽  
Training Intervention ◽  
Home Technology

Abstract Adherence to health behaviors is often poor, including adherence to at-home technology-based interventions. This study (N=120) explored adherence to a cognitive training intervention delivered via computer tablet, assessed adherence over a 4.5 month period, explored how individual difference factors shaped adherence, and tested the efficacy of message framing manipulations (positive vs. negative framing) in boosting adherence. Individual difference factors predicted adherence, including variations in self-efficacy and belief in the efficacy of cognitive training. Overall message framing had little impact. However, during the final portion of the study in which participants were asked to play as much or as little as they wanted instead of following a schedule, participants who received positively framed messages engaged with the intervention more. Implications for predicting and boosting adherence to home delivered technology-based interventions will be discussed.

scholarly journals Health Among Sexual Minority Older Adults: Individual Differences and Implications for Improving Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 860-860
Author(s):  
Britney Wardecker ◽  
Cara Exten
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Sexual Minority ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Psychological Health ◽  
Negative Mood ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Age Related

Abstract The number of sexual minority (SM) older adults is increasing rapidly, yet this population continues to be underrepresented in research (Fredriksen-Goldsen & Kim, 2017) and experiences significant disparities in health and health care access (Fredriksen-Goldsen, 2016; Wallace et al., 2011). In the current symposium, we analyze data from U.S. national probability samples of middle-aged and older adults (MIDUS, HRS, NESARC-III) to consider how age-related concerns and challenges may be experienced differently by SM individuals compared to their heterosexual counterparts. This symposium includes novel methods and statistical tools, such as daily diary assessments, multilevel modeling, and time-varying effects models. Individual presentations evaluate how: (1) SM women, compared to heterosexual women, may respond differently to menopause through norms and values surrounding womanhood; (2) midlife and older SM individuals use alcohol and cigarettes more frequently across a typical week than their heterosexual counterparts, though their substance use may not be tied to common triggers (e.g., negative mood, stress); (3) despite bisexual older adults reporting more health problems compared to lesbian and gay counterparts, they are less prepared for health concerns and crises (e.g., reporting a lower number of valid wills); and (4) the prevalence of depression and anxiety varies across age, such that older SM adults—especially women—are particularly vulnerable to psychological health problems. These presentations collectively examine complex issues facing older SM adults while emphasizing individual differences (i.e., women’s concerns, bisexual people’s issues). We discuss challenges in researching this growing at-risk population, and we highlight areas of future research and intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document