scholarly journals Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Altered Voluntary Cooperative Norms Compliance Under Equal Decision-Making Power

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbiao Li ◽  
Xiaoli Liu ◽  
Xile Yin ◽  
Shuaiqi Li ◽  
Guangrong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation

scholarly journals Is value-based choice repetition susceptible to medial frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)? A preregistered study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Senftleben ◽  
Johanna Kruse ◽  
Franziska M. Korb ◽  
Stefan Goetz ◽  
Stefan Scherbaum
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Medial Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Interindividual Variability ◽  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Subjective Value ◽  
Is Value

AbstractIn value-based decision making, people have to weigh different options based on their subjective value. This process, however, also is influenced by choice biases, such as choice repetition: in a series of choices, people are more likely to repeat their decision than to switch to a different choice. Previously, it was shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can affect such choice biases. We applied tDCS over the medial prefrontal cortex to investigate whether tDCS can alter choice repetition in value-based decision making. In a preregistered study, we applied anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS stimulation to 52 participants. While we found robust choice repetition effects, we did not find support for an effect of tDCS stimulation. We discuss these findings within the larger scope of the tDCS literature and highlight the potential roles of interindividual variability and current density strength.

Multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation over prefrontal cortex diminishes risk decision making: A preliminary study

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 485
Author(s):  
O. Martin de la Torre ◽  
D. Gallardo-Pujol ◽  
E. Marron ◽  
R. Viejo-Sobera ◽  
A. Cuevas-Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Risk Decision

scholarly journals Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Biases Action Choice in a Perceptual Decision Task

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2174-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir-Homayoun Javadi ◽  
Angeliki Beyko ◽  
Vincent Walsh ◽  
Ryota Kanai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Response Bias ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

One of the multiple interacting systems involved in the selection and execution of voluntary actions is the primary motor cortex (PMC). We aimed to investigate whether the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of this area can modulate hand choice. A perceptual decision-making task was administered. Participants were asked to classify rectangles with different height-to-width ratios into horizontal and vertical rectangles using their right and left index fingers while their PMC was stimulated either bilaterally or unilaterally. Two experiments were conducted with different stimulation conditions: the first experiment (n = 12) had only one stimulation condition (bilateral stimulation), and the second experiment (n = 45) had three stimulation conditions (bilateral, anodal unilateral, and cathodal unilateral stimulations). The second experiment was designed to confirm the results of the first experiment and to further investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal stimulations alone in the observed effects. Each participant took part in two sessions. The laterality of stimulation was reversed over the two sessions. Our results showed that anodal stimulation of the PMC biases participants' responses toward using the contralateral hand whereas cathodal stimulation biases responses toward the ipsilateral hand. Brain stimulation also modulated the RT of the left hand in all stimulation conditions: Responses were faster when the response bias was in favor of the left hand and slower when the response bias was against it. We propose two possible explanations for these findings: the perceptual bias account (bottom–up effects of stimulation on perception) and the motor-choice bias account (top–down modulation of the decision-making system by facilitation of response in one hand over the other). We conclude that motor responses and the choice of hand can be modulated using tDCS.

scholarly journals Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Influence the Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff in Perceptual Decision-making: Evidence from Three Independent Studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1283-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles de Hollander ◽  
Ludovica Labruna ◽  
Roberta Sellaro ◽  
Anne Trutti ◽  
Lorenza S. Colzato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Response Threshold ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Speed Accuracy ◽  
Accuracy Tradeoff

In perceptual decision-making tasks, people balance the speed and accuracy with which they make their decisions by modulating a response threshold. Neuroimaging studies suggest that this speed–accuracy tradeoff is implemented in a corticobasal ganglia network that includes an important contribution from the pre-SMA. To test this hypothesis, we used anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate neural activity in pre-SMA while participants performed a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants viewed a pattern of moving dots and judged the direction of the global motion. In separate trials, they were cued to either respond quickly or accurately. We used the diffusion decision model to estimate the response threshold parameter, comparing conditions in which participants received sham or anodal tDCS. In three independent experiments, we failed to observe an influence of tDCS on the response threshold. Additional, exploratory analyses showed no influence of tDCS on the duration of nondecision processes or on the efficiency of information processing. Taken together, these findings provide a cautionary note, either concerning the causal role of pre-SMA in decision-making or on the utility of tDCS for modifying response caution in decision-making tasks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document