scholarly journals The Role of Psychological and Physiological Factors in Decision Making under Risk and in a Dilemma

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Fooken ◽  
Markus Schaffner
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk ◽  
Physiological Factors

The role of incidental emotions in decision making under risk

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Kugler ◽  
Lisa D. Ordonez ◽  
Terry Connolly
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk

scholarly journals The role of forgone opportunities in decision making under risk

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Barreda-Tarrazona ◽  
Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutierrez ◽  
Daniel Navarro-Martinez ◽  
Gerardo Sabater-Grande
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk

Developmental changes in decision making under risk: The role of executive functions and reasoning abilities in 8- to 19-year-old decision makers

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 759-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Schiebener ◽  
María García-Arias ◽  
Domingo García-Villamisar ◽  
Javier Cabanyes-Truffino ◽  
Matthias Brand
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Executive Functions ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Developmental Changes ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk ◽  
Reasoning Abilities

scholarly journals The role of expecting feedback during decision-making under risk

NeuroImage ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 116079
Author(s):  
Francesco Rigoli ◽  
Cristina Martinelli ◽  
Sukhwinder S Shergill
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk

The strength of emotions in moral judgment and decision-making under risk

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Tyszka ◽  
Tomasz Zaleskiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Judgment And Decision Making ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Moral Norms ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk ◽  
Moral Issues ◽  
Risk Parameters

The strength of emotions in moral judgment and decision-making under risk The focus of this paper is the role of emotions in judgments and choices associated with moral issues. Study 1 shows that depending on the strength of emotions when making a moral decision, people become sensitive to the severity and the probability of harm that their decisions can bring to others. A possible interpretation is that depending on the strength of emotions, people in their moral judgments choose to be either utilitarian or deontologist. In Study 2, following the priority heuristic model, we found that in situations in which the violation of moral norms does not evoke strong negative emotions, people are sensitive to quantitative risk parameters (probabilities and outcomes), and the decision-making process requires a relatively longer time. In moral situations in which a violation of the moral norm evokes strong emotions, decision-making is based on arguments other than quantitative risk parameters, and the process takes a shorter time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document