scholarly journals Structural Insight Into Chitin Degradation and Thermostability of a Novel Endochitinase From the Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Jun Wang ◽  
Wen-Xin Jiang ◽  
Yi-Shuo Zhang ◽  
Hai-Yan Cao ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 293 (10) ◽  
pp. 3849-3859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela C. Monge ◽  
Tina R. Tuveng ◽  
Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad ◽  
Vincent G. H. Eijsink ◽  
Jeffrey G. Gardner

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 473-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weina Liu ◽  
Tao Tu ◽  
Yuan Gu ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
Fei Zheng ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Justyna E. Korczynska ◽  
Steffen Danielsen ◽  
Ulrika Schagerlöf ◽  
Johan P. Turkenburg ◽  
Gideon J. Davies ◽  
...  

Lysins are important biomolecules which cleave the bacterial cell-wall polymer peptidoglycan. They are finding increasing commercial and medical application. In order to gain an insight into the mechanism by which these enzymes operate, the X-ray structure of a CAZy family GH25 `lysozyme' fromAspergillus fumigatuswas determined. This is the first fungal structure from the family and reveals a modified α/β-barrel-like fold in which an eight-stranded β-barrel is flanked by three α-helices. The active site lies toward the bottom of a negatively charged pocket and its layout has much in common with other solved members of the GH25 and related GH families. A conserved active-site DXE motif may be implicated in catalysis, lending further weight to the argument that this glycoside hydrolase family operatesviaa `substrate-assisted' catalytic mechanism.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Liu ◽  
Weixing Zhu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Yong Zhou ◽  
Yanwei Duan ◽  
...  

The glycoside hydrolase family 18 chitinases degrade or alter chitin. Multiple catalytic domains in a glycoside hydrolase family 18 chitinase function synergistically during chitin degradation. Here, an insect group III chitinase from the agricultural pestOstrinia furnacalis(OfChtIII) is revealed to be an arthropod-conserved chitinase that contains two nonsynergistic GH18 domains according to its catalytic properties. Both GH18 domains are active towards single-chained chitin substrates, but are inactive towards insoluble chitin substrates. The crystal structures of each unbound GH18 domain, as well as of GH18 domains complexed with hexa-N-acetyl-chitohexaose or penta-N-acetyl-chitopentaose, suggest that the two GH18 domains possess endo-specific activities. Physiological data indicated that the developmental stage-dependent gene-expression pattern ofOfChtIII was the same as that of the chitin synthaseOfChsA but significantly different from that of the chitinaseOfChtI, which is indispensable for cuticular chitin degradation. Additionally, immunological staining indicated thatOfChtIII was co-localized withOfChsA. Thus,OfChtIII is most likely to be involved in the chitin-synthesis pathway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 107704
Author(s):  
Vladimír Puchart ◽  
Katarína Šuchová ◽  
Peter Biely

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4048
Author(s):  
Javier A. Linares-Pastén ◽  
Lilja Björk Jonsdottir ◽  
Gudmundur O. Hreggvidsson ◽  
Olafur H. Fridjonsson ◽  
Hildegard Watzlawick ◽  
...  

The structures of glycoside hydrolase family 17 (GH17) catalytic modules from modular proteins in the ndvB loci in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Glt1), P. putida (Glt3) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (previously B. japonicum) (Glt20) were modeled to shed light on reported differences between these homologous transglycosylases concerning substrate size, preferred cleavage site (from reducing end (Glt20: DP2 product) or non-reducing end (Glt1, Glt3: DP4 products)), branching (Glt20) and linkage formed (1,3-linkage in Glt1, Glt3 and 1,6-linkage in Glt20). Hybrid models were built and stability of the resulting TIM-barrel structures was supported by molecular dynamics simulations. Catalytic amino acids were identified by superimposition of GH17 structures, and function was verified by mutagenesis using Glt20 as template (i.e., E120 and E209). Ligand docking revealed six putative subsites (−4, −3, −2, −1, +1 and +2), and the conserved interacting residues suggest substrate binding in the same orientation in all three transglycosylases, despite release of the donor oligosaccharide product from either the reducing (Glt20) or non-reducing end (Glt1, Gl3). Subsites +1 and +2 are most conserved and the difference in release is likely due to changes in loop structures, leading to loss of hydrogen bonds in Glt20. Substrate docking in Glt20 indicate that presence of covalently bound donor in glycone subsites −4 to −1 creates space to accommodate acceptor oligosaccharide in alternative subsites in the catalytic cleft, promoting a branching point and formation of a 1,6-linkage. The minimum donor size of DP5, can be explained assuming preferred binding of DP4 substrates in subsite −4 to −1, preventing catalysis.


2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (42) ◽  
pp. 31254-31267
Author(s):  
Claire Moulis ◽  
Gilles Joucla ◽  
David Harrison ◽  
Emeline Fabre ◽  
Gabrielle Potocki-Veronese ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document