scholarly journals Diagnostic Yield of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panel for Pediatric-Onset Movement Disorders: A 3-Year Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Graziola ◽  
Giacomo Garone ◽  
Fabrizia Stregapede ◽  
Luca Bosco ◽  
Federico Vigevano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Movement Disorders ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Pediatric Onset

scholarly journals Diagnostic yield of targeted next generation sequencing in 2002 Dutch cardiomyopathy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Z. Alimohamed ◽  
LennartF. Johansson ◽  
Anna Posafalvi ◽  
Ludolf G. Boven ◽  
Krista K. van Dijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Generation Sequencing

High diagnostic yield of syndromic intellectual disability by targeted next-generation sequencing

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Martínez ◽  
Alfonso Caro-Llopis ◽  
Mónica Roselló ◽  
Silvestre Oltra ◽  
Sonia Mayo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
High Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Targeted next generation sequencing with an extended gene panel does not impact variant detection in mitochondrial diseases

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgane Plutino ◽  
Annabelle Chaussenot ◽  
Cécile Rouzier ◽  
Samira Ait-El-Mkadem ◽  
Konstantina Fragaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Mitochondrial Diseases ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Variant Detection ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large Cohort of Genetically Undiagnosed Patients with Neuromuscular Disorders in Spain

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 539
Author(s):  
Lidia Gonzalez-Quereda ◽  
Maria Jose Rodriguez ◽  
Jordi Diaz-Manera ◽  
Jorge Alonso-Perez ◽  
Eduard Gallardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorders ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorder ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Muscular Dystrophies ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Myasthenic Syndromes

The term neuromuscular disorder (NMD) includes many genetic and acquired diseases and differential diagnosis can be challenging. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is especially useful in this setting given the large number of possible candidate genes, the clinical, pathological, and genetic heterogeneity, the absence of an established genotype-phenotype correlation, and the exceptionally large size of some causative genes such as TTN, NEB and RYR1. We evaluated the diagnostic value of a custom targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel to study the mutational spectrum of a subset of NMD patients in Spain. In an NMD cohort of 207 patients with congenital myopathies, distal myopathies, congenital and adult-onset muscular dystrophies, and congenital myasthenic syndromes, we detected causative mutations in 102 patients (49.3%), involving 42 NMD-related genes. The most common causative genes, TTN and RYR1, accounted for almost 30% of cases. Thirty-two of the 207 patients (15.4%) carried variants of uncertain significance or had an unidentified second mutation to explain the genetic cause of the disease. In the remaining 73 patients (35.3%), no candidate variant was identified. In combination with patients’ clinical and myopathological data, the custom gene panel designed in our lab proved to be a powerful tool to diagnose patients with myopathies, muscular dystrophies and congenital myasthenic syndromes. Targeted NGS approaches enable a rapid and cost-effective analysis of NMD- related genes, offering reliable results in a short time and relegating invasive techniques to a second tier.

scholarly journals Targeted next generation sequencing identifies a genetic spectrum of DNA variants in patients with hemiplegic migraine

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 251581631988163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neven Maksemous ◽  
Robert A Smith ◽  
Heidi G Sutherland ◽  
Bridget H Maher ◽  
Omar Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Hemiplegic Migraine ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Variants Of Unknown Significance ◽  
High Mutation Frequency ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Atp1a2 Gene ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Objective: Hemiplegic migraine in both familial (FHM) and sporadic (SHM) forms is a rare subtype of migraine with aura that can be traced to mutations in the CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A genes. It is characterised by severe attacks of typical migraine accompanied by hemiparesis, as well as episodes of complex aura that vary significantly between individuals. Methods: Using a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel, we have sequenced the genomic DNA of 172 suspected hemiplegic migraine cases, in whom no mutation had previously been found by Sanger sequencing (SS) of a limited number of exons with high mutation frequency in FHM genes. Results: Genetic screening identified 29 variants, 10 of which were novel, in 35 cases in the three FHM genes ( CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A). Interestingly, in this suspected HM cohort, the ATP1A2 gene harboured the highest number of variants with 24/35 cases (68.6%), while CACNA1A ranked the second gene, with 5 variants identified in 7/35 cases (20%). All detected variants were confirmed by SS and were absent in 100 non-migraine healthy control individuals. Assessment of variants with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines classified 8 variants as pathogenic, 3 as likely pathogenic and 18 as variants of unknown significance. Targeted NGS gene panel increased the diagnostic yield by fourfold over iterative SS in our diagnostics facility. Conclusion: We have identified 29 potentially causative variants in an Australian and New Zealand cohort of suspected HM cases and found that the ATP1A2 gene was the most commonly mutated gene. Our results suggest that screening using NGS multigene panels to investigate ATP1A2 alongside CACNA1A and SCN1A is a clinically useful and efficient method.

scholarly journals Assessment of the incorporation of CNV surveillance into gene panel next-generation sequencing testing for inherited retinal diseases

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M Ellingford ◽  
Bradley Horn ◽  
Christopher Campbell ◽  
Gavin Arno ◽  
Stephanie Barton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Read Depth ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Genomic Variation ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Diagnostic Laboratory ◽  
Inherited Retinal Dystrophies ◽  
Generation Sequencing

BackgroundDiagnostic use of gene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques is commonplace for individuals with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs), a highly genetically heterogeneous group of disorders. However, these techniques have often failed to capture the complete spectrum of genomic variation causing IRD, including CNVs. This study assessed the applicability of introducing CNV surveillance into first-tier diagnostic gene panel NGS services for IRD.MethodsThree read-depth algorithms were applied to gene panel NGS data sets for 550 referred individuals, and informatics strategies used for quality assurance and CNV filtering. CNV events were confirmed and reported to referring clinicians through an accredited diagnostic laboratory.ResultsWe confirmed the presence of 33 deletions and 11 duplications, determining these findings to contribute to the confirmed or provisional molecular diagnosis of IRD for 25 individuals. We show that at least 7% of individuals referred for diagnostic testing for IRD have a CNV within genes relevant to their clinical diagnosis, and determined a positive predictive value of 79% for the employed CNV filtering techniques.ConclusionIncorporation of CNV analysis increases diagnostic yield of gene panel NGS diagnostic tests for IRD, increases clarity in diagnostic reporting and expands the spectrum of known disease-causing mutations.

scholarly journals Designing Myeloid Gene Panels

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Zhao ◽  
David S. Bosler ◽  
James R. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Molecular Pathology ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Variants Of Unknown Significance ◽  
The Core ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Context.— Next-generation sequencing studies are increasingly used in the evaluation of suspected chronic myeloid neoplasms (CMNs), but there is wide variability among laboratories in the genes analyzed for this purpose. Recently, the Association for Molecular Pathology CMN working group recommended a core 34-gene set as a minimum target list for evaluation of CMNs. This list was recommended based on literature review, and its diagnostic yield in clinical practice is unknown. Objective.— To determine the diagnostic yield of the core 34 genes and assess the potential impact of including selected additional genes. Design.— We retrospectively reviewed 185 patients with known or suspected CMNs tested using a 62-gene next-generation sequencing panel that included all 34 core genes. Results.— The Association for Molecular Pathology's core 34 genes had a diagnostic yield of 158 of 185 (85.4%) to detect at least 1 variant with strong/potential clinical significance and 107 of 185 (57.8%) to detect at least 2 such variants. The 62-gene panel had a diagnostic yield of 160 of 185 (86.5%) and 112 of 185 (60.5%), respectively. Variants of unknown significance were identified in 49 of 185 (26.5%) using the core 34 genes versus 76 of 185 (41.1%) using the 62-gene panel. Conclusions.— This study demonstrates that the Association for Molecular Pathology–recommended core 34-gene set has a high diagnostic yield in CMNs. Inclusion of selected additional genes slightly increases the rate of abnormal results, while also increasing the detection of variants of unknown significance. We recommend inclusion of CUX1, DDX41, ETNK1, RIT1, and SUZ12 in addition to the Association for Molecular Pathology's 34-gene core set for routine evaluation of CMNs.

scholarly journals Synchronous Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
Carlos A Pagan ◽  
Catherine A Shu ◽  
John P Crapanzano ◽  
Galina G Lagos ◽  
Mark B Stoopler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Synchronous Tumors ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Abstract Objectives To determine concordance/discordance between morphology and molecular testing (MT) among synchronous pulmonary carcinomas using targeted next generation sequencing (NGS), with and without comprehensive molecular review (CMR), vs analyses of multiple singe genes (non-NGS). Methods Results of morphologic and MT assessment were classified as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate. For discordant cases, comprehensive histologic assessment (CHA) was performed. Results Forty-seven cases with 108 synchronous tumors were identified and underwent MT (NGS, n = 23 and non-NGS, n = 24). Histology and MT were concordant, discordant, and indeterminate in 53% (25/47), 21% (10/47), and 26% (12/47) of cases, respectively. CHA of the 10 discordant cases revised results of three cases. Conclusions There is discordance between histology and MT in a subset of cases and MT provides an objective surrogate for staging synchronous tumors. A limited gene panel is sufficient for objectively assessing a relationship if the driver mutations are distinct. Relatedness of mutations require CMR with a larger NGS panel (eg, 50 genes).

scholarly journals Genetic landscape of pediatric movement disorders and management implications

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Cordeiro ◽  
Garrett Bullivant ◽  
Komudi Siriwardena ◽  
Andrea Evans ◽  
Jeff Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Movement Disorder ◽  
Exome Sequencing ◽  
Whole Exome Sequencing ◽  
Movement Disorders ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Whole Exome ◽  
Generation Sequencing

ObjectiveTo identify underlying genetic causes in patients with pediatric movement disorders by genetic investigations.MethodsAll patients with a movement disorder seen in a single Pediatric Genetic Movement Disorder Clinic were included in this retrospective cohort study. We reviewed electronic patient charts for clinical, neuroimaging, biochemical, and molecular genetic features. DNA samples were used for targeted direct sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing, or whole exome sequencing.ResultsThere were 51 patients in the Pediatric Genetic Movement Disorder Clinic. Twenty-five patients had dystonia, 27 patients had ataxia, 7 patients had chorea-athetosis, 8 patients had tremor, and 7 patients had hyperkinetic movements. A genetic diagnosis was confirmed in 26 patients, including in 20 patients with ataxia and 6 patients with dystonia. Targeted next-generation sequencing panels confirmed a genetic diagnosis in 9 patients, and whole exome sequencing identified a genetic diagnosis in 14 patients.ConclusionsWe report a genetic diagnosis in 26 (51%) patients with pediatric movement disorders seen in a single Pediatric Genetic Movement Disorder Clinic. A genetic diagnosis provided either disease-specific treatment or effected management in 10 patients with a genetic diagnosis, highlighting the importance of early and specific diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document