scholarly journals A Survey of Copy Number Variation in the Porcine Genome Detected From Whole-Genome Sequence

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittney N. Keel ◽  
Dan J. Nonneman ◽  
Amanda K. Lindholm-Perry ◽  
William T. Oliver ◽  
Gary A. Rohrer
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Trost ◽  
Susan Walker ◽  
Zhuozhi Wang ◽  
Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram ◽  
Jeffrey R. MacDonald ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ping Lee ◽  
Albert A. Tucci ◽  
Mitchell Conery ◽  
Yuk Yee Leung ◽  
Amanda B. Kuzma ◽  
...  

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a progressive neurologic disease and the most common form of dementia. While the causes of AD are not completely understood, genetics plays a key role in the etiology of AD, and thus finding genetic factors holds the potential to uncover novel AD mechanisms. For this study, we focus on copy number variation (CNV) detection and burden analysis. Leveraging whole-genome sequence (WGS) data released by Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), we developed a scalable bioinformatics pipeline to identify CNVs. This pipeline was applied to 1,737 AD cases and 2,063 cognitively normal controls. As a result, we observed 237,306 and 42,767 deletions and duplications, respectively, with an average of 2,255 deletions and 1,820 duplications per subject. The burden tests show that Non-Hispanic-White cases on average have 16 more duplications than controls do (p-value 2e-6), and Hispanic cases have larger deletions than controls do (p-value 6.8e-5).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diksha Sharma ◽  
Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat ◽  
Nicholas J. Matzke ◽  
Katherine Hannan ◽  
Ross D. Hannan ◽  
...  

AbstractRibosomal DNA genes (rDNA) encode the major ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) and in eukaryotic genomes are typically present as one or more arrays of tandem repeats. Species have characteristic rDNA copy numbers, ranging from tens to thousands of copies, with the number thought to be redundant for rRNA production. However, the tandem rDNA repeats are prone to recombination-mediated changes in copy number, resulting in substantial intra-species copy number variation. There is growing evidence that these copy number differences can have phenotypic consequences. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of what determines rDNA copy number, how it evolves, and what the consequences are, in part because of difficulties in quantifying copy number. Here, we developed a genomic sequence read approach that estimates rDNA copy number from the modal coverage of the rDNA and whole genome to help overcome limitations in quantifying copy number with existing mean coverage-based approaches. We validated our method using strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with previously-determined rDNA copy numbers, and then applied our pipeline to investigate rDNA copy number in a global sample of 788 yeast isolates. We found that wild yeast have a mean copy number of 92, consistent with what is reported for other fungi but much lower than in laboratory strains. We also show that different populations have different rDNA copy numbers. These differences can partially be explained by phylogeny, but other factors such as environment are also likely to contribute to population differences in copy number. Our results demonstrate the utility of the modal coverage method, and highlight the high level of rDNA copy number variation within and between populations.Author summaryThe ribosomal RNA gene repeats (rDNA) form large tandem repeat arrays in most eukaryote genomes. Their tandem arrangement makes the rDNA prone to copy number variation, and there is increasing evidence that this copy number variation has phenotypic consequences. However, difficulties in measuring rDNA copy number hamper investigation into rDNA copy number dynamics and their significance. Here we developed a novel bioinformatics method for measuring rDNA copy number from whole genome sequence data that is based on the modal sequence read coverage. We established parameters for optimal performance of the method and validated it using yeast strains of known rDNA copy numbers. We then applied the method to a dataset of almost 800 global yeast isolates and demonstrate that yeast populations have different rDNA copy numbers that partially correlate with phylogeny. Our work provides a simple and accurate method for determining rDNA copy number that leverages the growing number of whole genome datasets, and highlights the dynamic nature of rDNA copy number.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Whelan ◽  
Robert E. Handsaker ◽  
Giulio Genovese ◽  
Seva Kashin ◽  
Monkol Lek ◽  
...  

AbstractTwo intriguing forms of genome structural variation (SV) – dispersed duplications, and de novo rearrangements of complex, multi-allelic loci – have long escaped genomic analysis. We describe a new way to find and characterize such variation by utilizing identity-by-descent (IBD) relationships between siblings together with high-precision measurements of segmental copy number. Analyzing whole-genome sequence data from 706 families, we find hundreds of “IBD-discordant” (IBDD) CNVs: loci at which siblings’ CNV measurements and IBD states are mathematically inconsistent. We found that commonly-IBDD CNVs identify dispersed duplications; we mapped 95 of these common dispersed duplications to their true genomic locations through family-based linkage and population linkage disequilibrium (LD), and found several to be in strong LD with genome-wide association (GWAS) signals for common diseases or gene expression variation at their revealed genomic locations. Other CNVs that were IBDD in a single family appear to involve de novo mutations in complex and multi-allelic loci; we identified 26 de novo structural mutations that had not been previously detected in earlier analyses of the same families by diverse SV analysis methods. These included a de novo mutation of the amylase gene locus and multiple de novo mutations at chromosome 15q14. Combining these complex mutations with more-conventional CNVs, we estimate that segmental mutations larger than 1kb arise in about one per 22 human meioses. These methods are complementary to previous techniques in that they interrogate genomic regions that are home to segmental duplication, high CNV allele frequencies, and multi-allelic CNVs.Author SummaryCopy number variation is an important form of genetic variation in which individuals differ in the number of copies of segments of their genomes. Certain aspects of copy number variation have traditionally been difficult to study using short-read sequencing data. For example, standard analyses often cannot tell whether the duplicated copies of a segment are located near the original copy or are dispersed to other regions of the genome. Another aspect of copy number variation that has been difficult to study is the detection of mutations in the copy number of DNA segments passed down from parents to their children, particularly when the mutations affect genome segments which already display common copy number variation in the population. We develop an analytical approach to solving these problems when sequencing data is available for all members of families with at least two children. This method is based on determining the number of parental haplotypes the two siblings share at each location in their genome, and using that information to determine the possible inheritance patterns that might explain the copy numbers we observe in each family member. We show that dispersed duplications and mutations can be identified by looking for copy number variants that do not follow these expected inheritance patterns. We use this approach to determine the location of 95 common duplications which are dispersed to distant regions of the genome, and demonstrate that these duplications are linked to genetic variants that affect disease risk or gene expression levels. We also identify a set of copy number mutations not detected by previous analyses of sequencing data from a large cohort of families, and show that repetitive and complex regions of the genome undergo frequent mutations in copy number.


Hypertension ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1231-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi J. Charchar ◽  
Michael Kaiser ◽  
Andrew J. Bingham ◽  
Nina Fotinatos ◽  
Fahima Ahmady ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
KF Schilter ◽  
LM Reis ◽  
A Schneider ◽  
TM Bardakjian ◽  
O Abdul-Rahman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document