scholarly journals Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing?

10.3386/w6199 ◽  
1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Fullerton ◽  
Gilbert Metcalf
Keyword(s):  
Double Dividend ◽  
Environmental Taxes

Do Environmental Taxes Yield a Double Dividend?

1995 ◽  
pp. 52-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lans Bovenberg ◽  
Ruud A. de Mooij
Keyword(s):  
Double Dividend ◽  
Environmental Taxes

A Note on Weak Double Dividends

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert E. Metcalf ◽  
Mustafa H. Babiker ◽  
John Reilly
Keyword(s):  
Tax Reform ◽  
Double Dividend ◽  
Environmental Taxes ◽  
Environmental Tax ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Green Tax Reform ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Lump Sum

Abstract A weak double-dividend is the proposition that the welfare improvement from a green tax reform, where the revenue from an environmental tax is used to reduce other tax rates, must be greater than the welfare improvement from a reform where the environmental taxes are returned in a lump sum fashion. We show in this note that a weak double-dividend need not hold in a world with multiple distortions. In an economy with multiple distortions one must choose carefully which tax rates to reduce, or one can do worse than a lump sum redistribution of the environmental tax revenues.

Achieving Environmental and Fiscal Goals in Lithuania using Environmental Taxes

Ekonomika ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remigijus Čiegis ◽  
Vidmantas Jankauskas ◽  
Dalia Štreimikienė
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Environmental Taxation ◽  
Environmental Taxes ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Tax System ◽  
Strategic Actions ◽  
Damage Costs ◽  
Accession Countries ◽  
Taxation System ◽  
New System

The main aim of this article is to analyse and compare the former and revised system of environmental taxes in Lithuania. Conceptual, analytical and methodological issues associated with the use of these instruments in the Lithuanian context are thoroughly discussed. Comparative and system analysis allows revealing deficiencies of the previous system of taxes and positive features of the new system. Comparison of pollution taxes available in Lithuania with the damage costs related to these pollutants emissions as well as comparison of environmental taxes with those of EU and accession countries allows to evaluate the efficiency of existing tax system in Lithuania and provide recommendations for strategic actions with respect of increasing effectiveness of existing environmental taxation system.

MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES AND INSURANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 121-130
Author(s):  
Anatolii Petrovich Mykolaiets
Keyword(s):  
Political System ◽  
Production Management ◽  
National Level ◽  
The State ◽  
Social Representation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Environmental Taxes ◽  
The Political ◽  
Local Authorities ◽  
Natural Form

It is noted that from the standpoint of sociology, “management — a function of organized systems of various nature — (technical, biological, social), which ensures the preservation of their structure, maintaining a certain state or transfer to another state, in accordance with the objective laws of the existence of this system, which implemented by a program or deliberately set aside”. Management is carried out through the influence of one subsystem-controlling, on the other-controlled, on the processes taking place in it with the help of information signals or administrative actions. It is proved that self-government allows all members of society or a separate association to fully express their will and interests, overcome alienation, effectively combat bureaucracy, and promote public self-realization of the individual. At the same time, wide direct participation in the management of insufficiently competent participants who are not responsible for their decisions, contradicts the social division of labor, reduces the effectiveness of management, complicates the rationalization of production. This can lead to the dominance of short-term interests over promising interests. Therefore, it is always important for society to find the optimal measure of a combination of self-management and professional management. It is determined that social representation acts, on the one hand, as the most important intermediary between the state and the population, the protection of social interests in a politically heterogeneous environment. On the other hand, it ensures the operation of a mechanism for correcting the political system, which makes it possible to correct previously adopted decisions in a legitimate way, without resorting to violence. It is proved that the system of social representation influences the most important political relations, promotes social integration, that is, the inclusion of various social groups and public associations in the political system. It is proposed to use the term “self-government” in relation to several levels of people’s association: the whole community — public self-government or self-government of the people, to individual regions or communities — local, to production management — production self-government. Traditionally, self-government is seen as an alternative to public administration. Ideology and practice of selfgovernment originate from the primitive, communal-tribal democracy. It is established that, in practice, centralization has become a “natural form of government”. In its pure form, centralization does not recognize the autonomy of places and even local life. It is characteristic of authoritarian regimes, but it is also widely used by democratic regimes, where they believe that political freedoms should be fixed only at the national level. It is determined that since the state has achieved certain sizes, it is impossible to abandon the admission of the existence of local authorities. Thus, deconcentration appears as one of the forms of centralization and as a cure for the excesses of the latter. Deconcentration assumes the presence of local bodies, which depend on the government functionally and in the order of subordination of their officials. The dependency of officials means that the leadership of local authorities is appointed by the central government and may be displaced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document