scholarly journals Cigarette Taxes, Smoking, and Health in the Long-Run

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Moyan Li ◽  
Katherine Meckel ◽  
Daniel Rees ◽  
Daniel Sacks
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Moyan Li ◽  
Katherine Meckel ◽  
Daniel I. Rees ◽  
Daniel W. Sacks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Moyan Li ◽  
Katherine Meckel ◽  
Daniel I. Rees ◽  
Daniel W. Sacks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Moyan Li ◽  
Katherine Meckel ◽  
Daniel I. Rees ◽  
Daniel W. Sacks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Daniel Rees
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Daniel I. Rees
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Baum ◽  
Sandra Aguilar-Gomez ◽  
James Lightwood ◽  
Emilie Bruzelius ◽  
Stanton A Glantz ◽  
...  

IntroductionWhile a large body of literature suggests that tobacco control legislation—including fiscal measures such as excise taxes—effectively reduces tobacco smoking, the long-run (10+ years) relationship between cigarettes excise taxes and life expectancy has not been directly evaluated. Here, we test the hypothesis that increases in state cigarette excise taxes are positively associated with long-run increases in population-level life expectancy.MethodsWe studied age-standardised life expectancy among all US counties from 1996 to 2012 by sex, in relation to state cigarette excise tax rates by year, controlling for other demographic, socioeconomic and county-specific features. We used an error-correction model to assess the long-run relationship between taxes and life expectancy. We additionally examine whether the relationship between cigarette taxes and life expectancy was mediated by changes to county smoking prevalence and varied by the sex, income and rural/urban composition of a county.ResultsFor every one-dollar increase in cigarette tax per pack (in 2016 dollars), county life expectancy increased by 1 year (95% CI 0.60 to 1.40 years) over the long run, with the first 6-month increase in life expectancy taking 10 years to materialise. The association was mediated by changes in smoking prevalence and the magnitude of the association steadily increased as county income decreased.ConclusionsResults suggest that increasing cigarette excise tax rates translates to consequential population-level improvements in life expectancy, with larger effects in low-income counties.


Author(s):  
Kenneth F Warren

In this article I explore the history of cigar regulation, going back to colonial times, yet focusing on the current regulatory climate. I review the different regulations imposed on tobacco products throughout American history, concluding that government regulators were never particularly serious about regulating tobacco products until the release of the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health.  However, I point out that this Report was so obsessed with the health hazards of cigarettes that it actually had the unintended consequence of promoting In the long run the increased consumption of cigars. Today, health organizations show intense frustration with the FDA’s current refusal to regulate cigars, even though the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the FDA regulatory jurisdiction over cigars. But applying a totality of circumstances test, looking at the politics, economics, and even the lack of enough credible health studies on cigars, I conclude, somewhat surprisingly, that there are very good reasons why the FDA should probably not at this time jump into the regulatory arena and impose the same sort of tough regulations on cigars as imposed on cigarettes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Friedson ◽  
Daniel I. Rees
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document