scholarly journals Employer Learning and the Dynamics of Returns to Universities: Evidence from Chinese Elite Education during University Expansion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Démurger ◽  
Eric Hanushek ◽  
Lei Zhang
Antiquity ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (243) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn Palmer

A thematic or a period discipline?Industrial archaeology has generally been defined as a thematic discipline, concerned with only one aspect of man’s past activity. Although the term ‘archaeology of industry’ was used in the 19th century, it was Michael Rix who used the phrase ‘industrial archaeology’ in print for the first time (Rix 1955). He later defined industrial archaeology as ‘recording, preserving in selected cases and interpreting the sites and structures of early industrial activity, particularly the monuments of the Industrial Revolution’ (Rix 1967: 5). The emphasis on the term ‘industrial monument’ followed a need to define an industrial class of Ancient Monument so that some examples would be scheduled. Industrial archaeology, then, grew from the need to record and preserve standing structures threatened with demolition rather than an inherent desire to understand more about the historical period of the monuments. It was perhaps felt that understanding of the industrial revolution period was more readily arrived at by other means, particularly written historical evidence. During the ‘rescue’ years of the 1960s and 1970s, archaeology was one of the two areas of fastest university expansion and very popular in extra-mural teaching. But none of the archaeology departments took up industrial archaeology, although many of the extra-mural departments did; it is largely as a part-time, amateur interest that industrial archaeology has flourished ever since. The author’s post as an industrial archaeologist in the Leicester archaeology department is one of the first occasions on which the specialism has been given a place in full-time undergraduate archaeology courses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Nataliia LYPOVSKA ◽  
Pavlo ATAMANCHUK

The purpose of the study is to substantiate the need to support the system of professional training of public servants as a necessary condition for the modernization of public service. The methodological basis of the work is a socio-cultural approach in combination with the methods of sociological diagnostics – questionnaires and observation. Substantiated conditions for the implementation of the professional project of civil servants in Ukraine. It is emphasized that maintaining an integrated system of vocational training has significant advantages, such as: ensuring the appropriate level and quality of educational programs, the formation of vocational education and research environment, taking into account the educational needs of public servants. Application of research results: Emphasis is placed on the need to amend the Concept of reforming the system of professional training of civil servants, heads of local state administrations, their first deputies and deputies, local government officials and deputies of local councils to preserve the priority of the National Academy of Public Administration and its regional institutes. Іn the integrated system of professional training of public servants. It is proved that the integral implementation of the professional project of public servants is possible only if the system of elite education is preserved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document