scholarly journals Chick Growth Response Resulting from Methionine Additions to Various Protein Supplements with Pea Protein

1946 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Bolin ◽  
Charlie F. Petersen ◽  
C.E. Lampman ◽  
Olof E. Stamberg
1952 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Bolin ◽  
Earle W. Klosterman ◽  
Kermit Schlamb ◽  
Reece L. Bryant

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1233-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Campbell ◽  
D. A. Teitge ◽  
H. L. Classen

The response of broiler chicks fed rye with dietary pentosanase supplementation was examined with respect to rye variety, area of production, and maturity at harvest. There were significant differences among varieties in the absence of enzyme addition and significant differences (variety × enzyme, P < 0.01) in the magnitude of the chick growth response to dietary pentosanase (exp. 1). Kodiak and Cougar rye gave greater enzyme-induced growth response than did Gazelle rye, with Musketeer rye and an unknown sample displaying intermediate values. Experiment 2 gave similar results; both Kodiak and Cougar rye in chick diets gave a larger response to dietary pentosanase than did Musketeer rye (P > 0.05). Determination of soluble carbohydrates, as well as extract viscosity, indicated that Kodiak rye had higher extract viscosity, higher extractable pentosan content, and a lower arabinose-to-xylose ratio; however, these results were not consistent with Cougar rye. Differing production location of a single variety (Musketeer, exp. 3) or maturity at harvest (exp. 4) indicated no significant effect on the nutritive value of rye attributable to location or maturity with or without enzyme supplementation, nor was there an effect on the magnitude of enzyme response. In rye harvested at different stages of maturity there was, however, a nonsignificant linear depression in chick growth with rye harvested at higher moisture levels. Key words: Rye, pentosans, broiler chicks, pentosanase


1990 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 761 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Neutze

Wool growth response to formaldehyde-treated (HCHO) casein was used as an index of protein escaping degradation in the rumen. Merino wethers, 3 years old and weighing 41-49 kg, were given a basal diet of oat husks and urea, supplemented with HCHO-treated casein or 1 of 10 protein supplements. All sheep were given DL-methionine 2.4 g. Wool growth indices (%) were casein 10, linseed oilmeal 82, sunflower oilmeal 84, groundnut oilmeal 68, fish meal 113, lupins 83, peas 29, cottonseed meal 83, soyabean meal 73, HCHO-sunflower oilmeal 83 and HCHO-casein 100%. It was concluded that the technique was not sensitive enough to estimate loss of protein from the rumen with accuracy.


1961 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kam C. Leong ◽  
Leo S. Jensen ◽  
James McGinnis

1963 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Wisman ◽  
C.E. Howes
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 200 ◽  
Author(s):  
BS Sathe ◽  
RB Cumming ◽  
GL McClymont

On the basis of chick growth and efficiency of feed conversion, wide variation in the nutritional value of Australian meat meals has been observed, with all samples inferior in value to imported fish meal. No necessary relationship was observed between the crude protein and fat contents of the meals and the chick growth-promoting ability or efficiency of feed conversion. Small variations in growth response were significantly associated with the amount of ash contributed by meat meals to diets. However, ash was not the major cause of the differences between high and low quality meals. The addition of ash or ether extract from low quality meat meal to high quality meal did not indicate the presence of growth-depressing or toxic factors in these fractions. The results are interpreted as indicating that neither total protein content, ash content, or lipid content, nor ash or lipid toxic factors was the main cause of variation in the nutritional value of the meat meals studied.


1979 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Ørskov ◽  
D. A. Grubb

ABSTRACTTwo experiments were conducted on the fattening of 8- to 10-month-old lambs weighing about 40 to 55 kg live weight, using diets based on whole barley sprayed with a solution of urea and minerals or supplemented with a pelleted fish-protein concentrate.In one experiment the lambs had been adapted to indoor conditions but had been subjected to low levels of nutrition. In the other experiment the lambs were not previously adapted to indoor conditions. The lambs in the first experiment suffered no growth check while the lambs taken inside did not gain in weight for 2 to 3 weeks. In both experiments the lambs showed a short term or compensatory growth response to protein after which there were no differences between lambs receiving fish-protein supplements or urea-fortified grain.The results are discussed in relation to response to protein and urea and the method of incorporating urea and minerals as solubles in whole grain is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document