DARK FIRE-CURED TOBACCO RESPONSE TO POTASSIUM RATE AND APPLICATION METHOD

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 12-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell D. Richmond ◽  
Robert C. Pearce ◽  
William A. Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Application Method

EFFECT OF SULFENTRAZONE RATE AND APPLICATION METHOD ON WEED CONTROL AND STUNTING IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO

2003 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 12-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Fisher ◽  
W. D. Smith ◽  
J. W. Wilcut
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Application Method

COLMONOY No. 83 PTA

Alloy Digest ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Tungsten Carbide ◽  
Tensile Properties ◽  
Powder Metal ◽  
Application Method ◽  
Plasma Transferred Arc ◽  
Transferred Arc ◽  
Nickel Base

Abstract COLMONOY No. 83 PTA is a nickel-base hard surfacing alloy containing tungsten carbide. The application method is plasma transferred arc and the application is designed to protect extrusion screws. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, microstructure, hardness, tensile properties, and compressive strength. It also includes information on wear resistance as well as machining and powder metal forms. Filing Code: Ni-493. Producer or source: Wall Colmonoy Corporation.

Influence of Application Method on the Activity of Butylate and EPTC in Reduced-Tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Weed Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas D. Buhler
Keyword(s):  
Zea Mays ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
The Other ◽  
Growth Chamber ◽  
Reduced Tillage ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
Liquid Fertilizer ◽  
Application Method ◽  
Control Growth ◽  
Application Methods

Weed control in reduced-tillage corn (Zea maysL. ‘Pioneer 3732′) with butylate [S-ethyl bis(2-methylpropyl) carbamothioate] and EPTC (S-ethyl dipropyl carbarnothioate) was not reduced when these herbicides were applied jointly with dry or liquid fertilizer. In most cases, application with fertilizer resulted in weed control similar to that observed when the herbicide was applied in water at 285 L/ha. Butylate applied as a granular formulation also gave weed control similar to the spray at 285 L/ha. Application in 95 L/ha of water consistently resulted in reduced weed control. Corn injury was not greatly influenced by application method, and differences in corn yield appeared to be due to differences in weed control. Growth chamber bioassays indicated that both butylate and EPTC dissipated more rapidly when applied in 95 L/ha of water than the other application methods, which may explain differences in weed control observed in the field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document