Tallgrass Prairie Center Native Seed Production Manual Greg Houseal. 2008. University of Northern Iowa: Tallgrass Prairie Center. Paper. $18.00. 122 pages.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-89
Author(s):  
L. Axford
Ecology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1642-1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan C. Cook-Patton ◽  
Anurag A. Agrawal

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clinton C. Shock ◽  
Erik B.G. Feibert ◽  
Nancy L. Shaw ◽  
Myrtle P. Shock ◽  
Lamont D. Saunders

Plant Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. B. Schmidt ◽  
D. I. Urzedo ◽  
F. C. M. Piña‐Rodrigues ◽  
D. L. M. Vieira ◽  
G. M. Rezende ◽  
...  

Diversity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Linda Broadhurst ◽  
David Bush ◽  
Jim Begley

Landscape degradation is a major threat to global biodiversity that is being further exacerbated by climate change. Halting or reversing biodiversity decline using seed-based restoration requires tons of seed, most of which is sourced from wild populations. However, in regions where restoration is most urgent, wild seed sources are often fragmented, declining and producing seed with low genetic diversity. Seed production areas (SPAs) can help to reduce the burden of collecting native seed from remnant vegetation, improve genetic diversity in managed seed crops and contribute to species conservation. Banksia marginata (Proteaceae) is a key restoration species in south-eastern Australia but is highly fragmented and declining across much of its range. We evaluated genetic diversity, population genetic structure and relatedness in two B. marginata SPAs and the wild populations from which the SPA germplasm was sourced. We found high levels of relatedness within most remnants and that the population genetic structure was best described by three groups of trees. We suggest that SPAs are likely to be important to meet future native seed demand but that best practice protocols are required to assist land managers design and manage these resources including genetic analyses to guide the selection of germplasm.


2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Broadhurst ◽  
Cathy Waters ◽  
David Coates

Land clearing across southern Australia since European settlement has fundamentally changed the amount and distribution of native vegetation; it has also substantially reduced genetic diversity in plant species throughout Australia, especially in agricultural regions. The most recent State of the Environment report indicates that Australian biodiversity continues to decline. Many approaches to restoration are used in Australia including re-establishing plant populations using tube stock or by direct seeding. Native seed for these projects is often assumed to be plentiful and available for the majority of species we wish to restore but these assumptions are rarely true. We also rely on a small number of species for the majority of restoration projects despite the vast number of species required to fully restore complex plant communities. The majority of seed for restoration is still primarily collected from native vegetation despite longstanding concerns regarding the sustainability of this practice and the globally recognised impacts of vegetation fragmentation on seed production and genetic diversity. Climate change is also expected to challenge seed production as temperatures rise and water availability becomes more limited; changes to current planting practices may also be required. Until now native seed collection has relied on market forces to build a strong and efficient industry sector, but in reality the Australian native seed market is primarily driven by Federal, State and Territory funding. In addition, unlike other seed-based agri-businesses native seed collection lacks national industry standards. A new approach is required to support development of the native seed collection and use sector into an innovative industry.


AMBIO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Urzedo ◽  
Simone Pedrini ◽  
Daniel L. M. Vieira ◽  
Alexandre B. Sampaio ◽  
Bruna D. F. Souza ◽  
...  

AbstractThe UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration is poised to trigger the recovery of ecosystem services and transform structural injustices across the world in a way unparalleled in human history. The inclusion of diverse Indigenous and local communities to co-create robust native seed supply systems is the backbone to achieve the goals for the Decade. Here we show how community-based organizations have co-developed native seed supply strategies for landscape restoration from the bottom-up. We draw on the interconnections over two decades of seed networks in Brazil and the emerging Indigenous participation in native seed production in Australia. From an environmental justice perspective, we provide a participatory seed supply approach for local engagement, noting local geographical, social and cultural contexts. Meeting large-scale restoration goals requires the connection between local seed production and collaborative platforms to negotiate roles, rights and responsibilities between stakeholders. An enduring native seed supply must include a diversity of voices and autonomy of community groups that builds equitable participation in social, economic, and environmental benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document