scholarly journals (Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and peripheral artery disease combining antiaggregation and anticoagulation therapy. Expert consensus statement of the Czech Society of Cardiology, the Czech Society of Internal Medicine and the Czech Society of Angiology to the outcomes of COMPASS trial)

Cor et Vasa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. e334-e340
Author(s):  
Petr Widimský ◽  
Debora Karetová ◽  
Richard Češka ◽  
Miloš Táborský ◽  
Hana Rosolová ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena M. Yubero-Serrano ◽  
Juan F. Alcalá-Diaz ◽  
Francisco M. Gutierrez-Mariscal ◽  
Antonio P. Arenas-de Larriva ◽  
Patricia J. Peña-Orihuela ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is recognized as a significant predictor of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). In fact, coexisting PAD and CHD is strongly associated with a greater coronary event recurrence compared with either one of them alone. High-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is found to be inversely associated with an increased risk of incident CHD. However, this association is not established in patients with PAD in the context of secondary prevention. In this sense, our main aim was to evaluate the association between CEC and PAD in patients with CHD and whether the concurrent presence of PAD and T2DM influences this association. Methods CHD patients (n = 1002) from the CORDIOPREV study were classified according to the presence or absence of PAD (ankle-brachial index, ABI ≤ 0.9 and ABI > 0.9 and < 1.4, respectively) and T2DM status. CEC was quantified by incubation of cholesterol-loaded THP-1 cells with the participants' apoB-depleted plasma was performed. Results The presence of PAD determined low CEC in non-T2DM and newly-diagnosed T2DM patients. Coexisting PAD and newly-diagnosed T2DM provided and additive effect providing an impaired CEC compared to non-T2DM patients with PAD. In established T2DM patients, the presence of PAD did not determine differences in CEC, compared to those without PAD, which may be restored by glucose-lowering treatment. Conclusions Our findings suggest an inverse relationship between CEC and PAD in CHD patients. These results support the importance of identifying underlying mechanisms of PAD, in the context of secondary prevention, that provide potential therapeutic targets, that is the case of CEC, and establishing strategies to prevent or reduce the high risk of cardiovascular events of these patients. Trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00924937. Unique Identifier: NCT00924937


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena M. Yubero-Serrano ◽  
Juan F. Alcalá-Diaz ◽  
Francisco M. Gutierrez-Mariscal ◽  
Antonio P. Arenas-de Larriva ◽  
Patricia J. Peña-Orihuela ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Tmoyan ◽  
M. Ezhov ◽  
O. Afanasieva ◽  
E. Klesareva ◽  
M. Afanasieva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L D Colantonio ◽  
Y Dai ◽  
D Hubbard ◽  
R S Rosenson ◽  
T M Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are recommended to take a statin to reduce their risk for future cardiovascular events. Prior studies suggest that statins are being taken by most adults with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, there are few data on the use of statins among adults with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Purpose To compare the use of statins among US adults with a history of PAD versus those with a history of CHD. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study among US adults ≥19 years of age with commercial or government health insurance who had a history of CHD or PAD as of December 31, 2014 (n=1,006,451, mean age 63 years, 47% male). We used pharmacy claims between January 1 and December 31, 2014 to identify use of any statin and of a high-intensity statin (i.e., atorvastatin 40–80 mg, rosuvastatin 20–40 mg, simvastatin 80 mg). Patients with a history of CHD without PAD (CHD only), both CHD and PAD, and PAD without CHD (PAD only) were analysed. Prevalence ratios for use of any statin and a high-intensity statin among those taking a statin were calculated after multivariable adjustment for sociodemographics and cardiovascular risk factors. Results Overall, 69.1% of patients included in the current analysis had CHD only, 21.4% had both CHD and PAD, and 9.5% had PAD only. Overall, 66.0%, 68.2% and 47.5% of patients with CHD only, CHD and PAD, and PAD only were taking a statin. After multivariable adjustment and compared to patients with CHD only, the prevalence ratio for statin use was 1.02 (95% CI 1.01, 1.02) for those with both CHD and PAD and 0.82 (95% CI 0.82, 0.83) for those with PAD only. Among patients taking a statin, 29.4% of those with CHD only, 28.6% of those with both CHD and PAD, and 17.3% of those with PAD only were taking a high-intensity dosage. Compared to patients with CHD only, the multivariable adjusted prevalence ratio for taking a high-intensity dosage was 1.05 (95% CI 1.04, 1.06) for those with both CHD and PAD and 0.71 (95% CI 0.70, 0.73) for those with PAD only. Conclusion Adults with PAD receive less intensive statin therapy compared with their counterparts who have CHD. Interventions aimed to increase statin use among patients with PAD are warranted. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was supported through a research grant from Amgen, Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA).


2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 1215-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Hirose ◽  
Taishiro Chikamori ◽  
Satoshi Hida ◽  
Hirokazu Tanaka ◽  
Yuko Igarashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alisha P. Chaudhry ◽  
Ronald A. Hankey ◽  
Vinod C. Kaggal ◽  
Huzefa Bhopalwala ◽  
David A. Liedl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document