scholarly journals Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Mobilization on Neck Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

Author(s):  
Edgaras Lapinskas ◽  
Janina Stirbytė

Background. Neck pain is a common problem, and it includes 30% of 25–29 year olds. The percentage of people over 45 years of age has risen to 50% (Knight and Draper, 2012). Long-term muscle imbalance disrupts body biomechanics. Due to long-lasting pain, the quality of work may decrease, rest can get worse, and mood may change. Purpose. To determine the effect of temporomandibular joint mobilization for neck pain and function in patients who suffer chronic non-specifc neck pain. Methods. The study involved six people with non-specifc chronic neck pain, who were divided into two groups: exercises, and the second group – exercises and mobilization of temporomandibular joint. At the beginning and end of the study, we performed the following tests: deep neck flexor endurance test, visual analogue scale (VAS), goniometry, the amplitude of the temporomandibular joint. Results. In the group of exercises, the pain score after treatment decreased (before – 67 ± 28, after – 14 ± 16.5) the strength and endurance of the deep neck flexor muscle improved (before – 13.7 ± 2.5 s, after – 28.7 ± 6.4 s). The amplitude of all neck movements was improved (p < 0.05), comparing them before and after physiotherapy. The amplitude of the temporomandibular joint improved the movement characteristics: depression, lateral excursions to left and right, protrusion (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Comparing the results after applying different methods of physiotherapy, intensity of pain and neck function parameters did not show significant differences.Keywords: temporomandibular joint, nonspecifc neck pain, mobilization.

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1075-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Karlsson ◽  
B. Gerdle ◽  
B. Ghafouri ◽  
E. Bäckryd ◽  
P. Olausson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
Susan L. Edmond ◽  
Mark W. Werneke ◽  
Michelle Young ◽  
David Grigsby ◽  
Brian McClenahan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1271-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hsiu Cheng ◽  
Hao-Tsung Su ◽  
Ling-Wei Yen ◽  
Wen-Yu Liu ◽  
Hsin-Yi Kathy Cheng

Spine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (15) ◽  
pp. E908-E914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patirck Waeyaert ◽  
Daniel Jansen ◽  
Marco Bastiaansen ◽  
Aldo Scafoglieri ◽  
Ronald Buyl ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Hallman ◽  
Svend Erik Mathiassen ◽  
Eugene Lyskov

Background. We determined the extent to which heart rate variability (HRV) responses to daily physical activity differ between subjects with and without chronic neck pain.Method. Twenty-nine subjects (13 women) with chronic neck pain and 27 age- and gender-matched healthy controls participated. Physical activity (accelerometry), HRV (heart rate monitor), and spatial location (Global Positioning System (GPS)) were recorded for 74 hours. GPS data were combined with a diary to identify periods of work and of leisure at home and elsewhere. Time- and frequency-domain HRV indices were calculated and stratified by period and activity type (lying/sitting, standing, or walking). ANCOVAs with multiple adjustments were used to disclose possible group differences in HRV.Results. The pain group showed a reduced HRV response to physical activity compared with controls (p=.001), according to the sympathetic-baroreceptor HRV index (LF/HF, ratio between low- and high-frequency power), even after adjustment for leisure time physical activity, work stress, sleep quality, mental health, and aerobic capacity (p=.02). The parasympathetic response to physical activity did not differ between groups.Conclusions. Relying on long-term monitoring of physical behavior and heart rate variability, we found an aberrant sympathetic-baroreceptor response to daily physical activity among subjects with chronic neck pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document