Genetic analysis of red lionfish Pterois volitans from Florida, USA leads to alternative North Atlantic introduction scenarios

Author(s):  
ME Hunter ◽  
CE Beaver ◽  
NA Johnson ◽  
EK Bors ◽  
AA Mignucci-Giannoni ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana González ◽  
Marcela Grijalba-Bendeck ◽  
Arturo Acero ◽  
Ricardo Betancur-R.

Author(s):  
Ewan Trégarot ◽  
Marine Fumaroli ◽  
Alexandre Arqué ◽  
Claire Hellio ◽  
Jean-Philippe Maréchal

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula E. Whitfield ◽  
Jonathan A. Hare ◽  
Andrew W. David ◽  
Stacey L. Harter ◽  
Roldan C. Muñoz ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff W. Higdon

The comments by A. Romero and S. Kannada (2006. Can. J. Zool. 84: 1059–1065) provide a brief summary of North Atlantic whaling history as a critique of T. Rastogi et al. (2004. Can. J. Zool. 82: 1647–1654) . However, they fall far short of providing an accurate review of whaling history in this region. The authors present a number of factual errors, misuse several key sources, and make significant omissions, ultimately defeating the purpose of providing information to biologists, managers, and historians. In this comment I highlight the mistakes in their representation of the history of North Atlantic whaling for bowhead whales ( Balaena mysticetus L., 1758). There are unacceptable errors for most nations covered, and for American whaling in particular. The authors assert that over 30 000 bowhead whales were landed by Yankee whalers in the North Atlantic when the vast majority were in fact taken on the Pacific grounds. Although a summary of whaling history is an admirable goal and of potential value, it is unfortunate that the authors missed such an opportunity by failing to adequately research this topic, failing to include important citations, and by including sources that do not provide the information indicated. Providing a whaling summary with such errors and omissions only adds further confusion to an already confusing theme.


Author(s):  
Katherine A. Galloway ◽  
Delaney J. Frazier ◽  
Marianne E. Porter

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 1059-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldemaro Romero ◽  
Shelly Kannada

Rastogi et al. presented their genetic analysis of 16th-century whale bones found on a Basque whaling ship excavated from Red Bay, Labrador Peninsula, Canada. Based on the results from a very small sample, these authors concluded that whaling populations were already depleted before the onset of whaling. This is in direct contradiction to historical data. They also implied that the Basques were the only Europeans whaling in the North Atlantic before the onset of Yankee whaling and that there was a belief that Basque whalers historically killed equal numbers of right and bowhead whales. Here we present data based on historical and archaeological records generated by several authors using different methodologies, which clearly show that (i) Basques were not the only whalers that impacted cetacean populations in the North Atlantic; (ii) the number of whales killed by different peoples for approximately two centuries indicates that both right and bowhead whale population levels were much higher than typically assumed; and (iii) for many years there have been records published indicating that the Basques and others killed more bowhead whales than right whales, at least in the western North Atlantic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document