scholarly journals Variability in trophic level and habitat use in response to environmental forcing: isotopic niche dynamics of breeding seabirds in the southeastern Bering Sea

2018 ◽  
Vol 593 ◽  
pp. 247-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
AP Will ◽  
AS Kitaysky
Ibis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Mills ◽  
Rona A.R. McGill ◽  
Yves Cherel ◽  
Stephen C. Votier ◽  
Richard A. Phillips

2009 ◽  
Vol 81 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 214-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Suryan ◽  
Vincent S. Saba ◽  
Bryan P. Wallace ◽  
Scott A. Hatch ◽  
Morten Frederiksen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 11713-11726
Author(s):  
Mark S. Ridgway ◽  
Gabriel Piette‐Lauzière ◽  
Allan H. Bell ◽  
Julie Turgeon

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1959-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F. Lowry ◽  
V.N. Burkanov ◽  
K.J. Frost ◽  
M.A. Simpkins ◽  
R. Davis ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1959-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
L F Lowry ◽  
V N Burkanov ◽  
K J Frost ◽  
M A Simpkins ◽  
R Davis ◽  
...  

Twelve spotted seals (Phoca largha) equipped with satellite-linked tags were tracked in the Bering Sea for 46-272 days during August-June 1991-1994. Alaskan seals were mostly near shore during August-October and 100-200 km offshore in January-June, and were broadly distributed in the region north of the 200-m isobath. Russian seals were located primarily near shore and within 100 km of the 200-m isobath during all months. During August-October, all seals were usually more than 200 km south of the sea-ice edge. In January-June, seals were mostly 0-200 km north of the sea-ice edge, often in areas with extensive ice coverage (7/10-9/10). We tested for habitat selection by determining how frequently a randomly moving seal would have been located in each habitat and comparing that with observed habitat use. Russian seals selected for nearshore and shallow-water areas in September-October and for near shore, within 25 km of the 200-m isobath, and the ice front during November-April. Alaskan seals selected for near shore areas in September-December; for offshore, shallow water, and the ice front in January-February; and for shallow water and pack ice in March-April. Biological processes associated with the highly productive "Green Belt" may have influenced the habitat use of Russian seals, but this did not appear to have been the case with Alaskan seals.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Kearney ◽  
Albert Hermann ◽  
Wei Cheng ◽  
Ivonne Ortiz ◽  
Kerim Aydin

Abstract. The Bering Sea is a highly productive ecosystem, supporting a variety of fish, seabird, and marine mammal populations as well as large commercial fisheries. Due to its unique shelf geometry and the presence of seasonal sea ice, the processes controlling productivity in the Bering Sea ecosystem span the pelagic water column, the benthic sea floor, and the sympagic sea ice environments. The BESTNPZ model has been developed to simulate the lower trophic level processes throughout this region. Here, we present a version of this lower trophic level model coupled to a three-dimensional regional ocean model for the Bering Sea. We quantify the model's ability to reproduce key physical features of biological importance as well as its skill in capturing the seasonal and interannual variations in primary and secondary productivity. We find that the ocean model demonstrates considerable skill in replicating observed horizontal and vertical patterns of water movement, mixing, and stratification, as well as the temperature and salinity signatures of various water masses throughout the Bering Sea. It is also able to capture the mean seasonal cycle of primary production observed on the data-rich eastern middle shelf. However, its ability to replicate domain-wide patterns in nutrient cycling, primary production, and zooplankton community composition, particularly with respect to the interannual variations that are important in a fisheries management context, remains limited.


Mammal Review ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIM E. W. SHELDEN ◽  
SUE E. MOORE ◽  
JANICE M. WAITE ◽  
PAUL R. WADE ◽  
DAVID J. RUGH

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M. Riekenberg ◽  
Jaime Camalich ◽  
Elisabeth Svensson ◽  
Lonneke L. IJsseldijk ◽  
Sophie M.J.M. Brasseur ◽  
...  

AbstractBaleen from mysticete whales is a well-preserved proteinaceous material that can be used to identify migrations and feeding habits for species whose migration pathways are unknown. Analysis of δ13C and δ15N from bulk baleen has been used to infer migration patterns for individuals. However, this approach has fallen short of identifying migrations between regions as it is difficult to determine variations in isotopic shifts without temporal sampling of prey items. Here we apply analysis of δ15N values of amino acids to five baleen plates belonging to three species, revealing novel insights on trophic position, metabolic state, and migration between regions. Humpback and minke whales had higher reconstructed trophic levels than fin whales (3.4-3.5 versus 2.7-2.9, respectively) as expected due to different feeding specialization. Isotopic niche areas between baleen minima and maxima were well separated, indicating regional resource use for individuals during migration that aligned with isotopic gradients in Atlantic Ocean particulate organic matter. δ15N values from phenylalanine confirmed regional separation between the niche areas for two fin whales as migrations occurred and elevated glycine and threonine δ15N values revealed physiological changes due to fasting. Simultaneous resolution of trophic level and physiological changes allow for identification of regional migrations in mysticetes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document