scholarly journals Modeling salmon lice effects on sea trout population dynamics using an individual-based approach

Author(s):  
RD Hedger ◽  
OH Diserud ◽  
B Finstad ◽  
AJ Jensen ◽  
DK Hendrichsen ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Cazemier

In the past, the anadromous salmonids, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and sea-trout (Salmo trutta), have formed natural populations in the river Rhine. From the beginning of the nineteenth century onwards, the greater part of the drainage area of the river has been gradually altered from a more or less rural and agricultural area, into a highly industrialised one with subsequent industrialisation, river-engineering and heavy pollution. These developments are considered to be the major cause for the disappearance of the populations of anadromous salmonid fish in the 1950s. The water quality has recovered significantly during the past 25 years. From about 1975 onwards, this process gave rise to a recovery of the anadromous trout population. Results of recent studies of the sea-trout migration pattern are presented. They reveal that nowadays these salmonids can complete their up- and downstream migrations from the North Sea to places, situated at hundreds of kilometres upward the river and vica versa. The numbers of recorded Atlantic salmon and catch locations in inland waters are presented. They show a significant increase since 1989. These phenomena can be understood as promising signs of the recovery of the Rhine aquatic ecosystem.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Tissot ◽  
Victor Bret ◽  
Hervé Capra ◽  
Philippe Baran ◽  
Véronique Gouraud

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 1071-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Bui ◽  
Elina Halttunen ◽  
Agnes M Mohn ◽  
Tone Vågseth ◽  
Frode Oppedal

Abstract With different ecological characteristics amongst salmonid species, their response to parasitic infestation is likely to vary according to their spatial and temporal overlap with the parasite. This study investigated the host–parasite interactions amongst three species of salmonids and the ectoparasitic salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. To determine any variation in infestation parameters amongst salmonids, single population groups of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha), and previously-infested and naïve sea trout (Salmo trutta) were exposed to a controlled infestation challenge. We found that chinook salmon and both sea trout groups were more susceptible to acquiring lice than Atlantic salmon. Behavioural responses during infestation were more pronounced in Atlantic and chinook salmon. Parasite development was similar in lice attached to Atlantic salmon and sea trout, but hindered on chinook salmon. At 16 days post-infestation, chinook salmon had reduced lice loads to the same level as Atlantic salmon, whilst sea trout retained their lice. These results demonstrate differences in interactions with L. salmonis amongst these species, and highlight the vulnerability of sea trout to infestation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
EB Thorstad ◽  
CD Todd ◽  
I Uglem ◽  
PA Bjørn ◽  
PG Gargan ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pål Arne Bjørn ◽  
Bengt Finstad

The developmental rate, distribution on the host, and pathogenicity (skin damage) of salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) were tested on artificially infected sea trout (Salmo trutta) post smolts. Male lice developed faster than females, taking approximately 29 and 38 days, respectively, to reach the adult stage at 10°C. During this time, infection intensity decreased. Less than 40% of the lice reached the adult stage, and their distribution changed from overdispersed towards a more random pattern. The chalimus larvae of the lice exhibited a preference for the gills and fins, especially the dorsal fin, and caused only minor skin damage. When the preadult and adult stages appeared, skin damage became severe, especially on the preferred head and dorsal areas, causing mortality of the most heavily infected fish.


2000 ◽  
Vol 133 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Charles ◽  
R. Bravo De La Parra ◽  
J.-P. Mallet ◽  
H. Persat ◽  
P. Auger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document