scholarly journals THE ACHIEVEMENT GOAL THEORY AS AN APPROACH TO STUDY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP MOTIVATION

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Christian Brandmo ◽  
Dijana Tiplic ◽  
Eyvind Elstad

This study investigates how the achievement goal theory and its measures can be utilized to understand the school principals’ achievement goals for leading. The achievement goal theory is an analytical tool little used when studying educational management. This explorative study aims at developing a measure of principals’ achievement goals for leading, by using a factor analysis of the scores of 270 Norwegian principals. The analysis shows a clear distinction between principals’ mastery and performance goals for leading. Mastery goals for leading were positively correlated with constructs such as principals’ efficacy beliefs for leading, autonomy and teacher-principal trust, while performance goals were weaker or not significantly correlated with these constructs. The study suggests that the context and organizational factors are influencing principals’ purposes of achievement behaviour. Given the increasing emphasis on the accountability of school leaders, the current study suggests the achievement goal theory as a fruitful approach when studying educational leadership. Key words: accountability, achievement goals, educational leadership, school leaders’ motivation.

2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren C. Treasure ◽  
Joan L. Duda ◽  
Howard K. Hall ◽  
Glyn C. Roberts ◽  
Carol Ames ◽  
...  

In a recent article, Harwood, Hardy, and Swain (2000) presented what they termed a critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of achievement goals in sport. The purpose of the present article is to challenge their interpretation of achievement goal theory and to question many of their subsequent recommendations. Specifically, the present response will focus on Harwood et al.’s (a) interpretation of Nicholls’ personal theories of achievement; (b) their contention that task involvement cannot exist in competitive sport; (c) the proposed tripartite conceptualization of goal involvement states; (d) their understanding of the relationship between the way an individual conceptualizes ability and the foundation of dispositional goal orientations; and (e) their criticisms of the way dispositional goal orientations have been measured in sport. Theoretical frameworks are always a work in progress. To this end, we concur with the spirit of Harwood et al.’s article which implies that our conceptual models should be continuously questioned, tested, and extended. However, we believe their interpretation and recommendations do little to enhance our conceptual understanding of achievement goal theory in sport.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Daumiller ◽  
Markus Dresel

Researchers’ motivations are important for high-quality research and the productivity of the scientific system, but have been little investigated. Using three studies, we tested the usefulness of Achievement Goal Theory for describing research motivations, investigated which goals researchers pursue, and examined their associations with job burnout/engagement and professional learning. Interviewing 20 researchers (Study 1), we found that most of their goals in the research context were classifiable as achievement goals. Apart from (well-established in the literature) mastery and performance goals, they also mentioned relational and work-avoidance goals. Mastery goals comprised task and learning standards, performance goals appearance and normative strivings. In Study 2, we used a standardized questionnaire to assess these goals in 824 researchers, along with burnout/engagement levels, professional learning time, and professional learning gains. Results confirmed the separability of all conceptualized goals, measurement invariance across academic status, and differential patterns of associations with burnout/engagement and professional learning. In Study 3, we evaluated these constructs in 471 researchers at two time points, six months apart. Results attested measurement invariance over time. Cross-lagged analyses documented similar associations as in Study 2. Learning approach and relational goals had positive effects on professional learning; appearance avoidance and work-avoidance goals were negative predictors. In contrast, burnout was negatively predicted by normative avoidance goals. However, high initial burnout levels were associated with reduced task approach and learning approach, and stronger work-avoidance goals six months later. Taken together, this highlights the usefulness of Achievement Goal Theory for understanding researchers’ motivations, and their relatedness with professional learning and well-being at work.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamden K Strunk ◽  
Wilson Lester ◽  
Forrest Lane ◽  
Payton Hoover ◽  
Jasmine Betties

Achievement goal theory is a popular theoretical framework that has been widely used to understand the goals students hold regarding their academic work. This theoretical model has been subject to an ongoing debate regarding the number and nature of constructs it includes. Notable in such debates has been the inclusion or exclusion of mastery-avoidance goals. The purpose of this study was to conduct meta-analytic confirmatory factor analyses (MA-CFA) on two popular achievement goal measures, the Achievement Goal Questionnaire-Revised (AGQ-R) and the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) achievement goals scales, to analyze the structure of these scales across published studies. The models were a better fit for the data without mastery-avoidance, and overall the data suggest researchers should consider excluding mastery-avoidance.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Αγγελική Τσιακάρα

Motivation theories are often used in educational research to explain students‟ choices, and performance in school activities. Alienated or disaffected students generally lack motivation to attend school and to engage in learning. Achievement Goal Theory is a motivational theory focusing on the criteria or standards of excellence that individuals use to evaluate their competence (Meece, Anderman, & Anderman, 2006). According to Nicholls (1989), children after the age of 10 to 11 years develop at least two different ways to evaluate their ability. However, there are questions about “what happens in younger ages and specifically at preschool age?” and “how these ways of thinking are being developed?”The present thesis examined the above questions in relation with the phenomenon of competition in preschool aged children (4-6 years old). This is because competition is a daily phenomenon in educational environments (Shields & Bredemeier, 2009) even in kindergartens (Sheridan & Williams, 2006).In Chapter II, a literature review summarizes relative studies devoted to competition, the main characteristics of the preschool age and the factors which affect competitive behavior. Furthermore, theories of motivation, children‟s perception of their ability, children‟s perceptions of learning environment and the correlation between them are summarized. The main results of the literature review showed that competition is a daily phenomenon in educational settings. From the age of 4 years old, children perceive competition and present competitive behavior trying to excel among peers. The factors which affect the expression of competitive behaviors are: a) age, b) gender, c) composition of the team. According to Achievement Goal Theory the motivation of children is affected by how they evaluate their ability. The learning environment, which can be distinguished in mastery environment and performance environment, affects the way children perceive their ability.Three distinct studies have been carried out and their results are presented and discussed in Chapters IV-VI, aiming at: i) examining the ways through which preschool children express competitive behavior in kindergarten classroom, ii) developing a direct observational system which aimed at assessing competitive behaviors in preschool children and iii) examining how competition, in a learning environment, affects children‟s perception of their performance.The data obtained are presented and thoroughly discussed in Chapter VII, while the general conclusions and the future perspectives are presented in Chapter VIII. The main findings of this thesis can be summarized below. It was showed that preschool children express competitive behaviors both verbally and physically in kindergarten classrooms. More specifically, these behaviors appear with higher frequency during organized activities. It was also found that competition may affect preschool children‟s performance but not their perception of performance. Finally, in order to encourage preschool children‟s motivation for learning, some helpful advices for kindergarten teachers are presented in the Chapter IX.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document